2011-Ohio-4552, 953 N.E.2d 333
No. 2011-1146.Supreme Court of Ohio.
September 12, 2011.
Cuyahoga App. No. 94662, 2011-Ohio-2388.
Motion and Procedural Rulings.
This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.
Review of appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction reveals that it fails to comply with S.Ct.Prac. R. 3.1(C), which requires that a memorandum “shall not exceed fifteen numbered pages, exclusive of the table of contents and the certificate of service.” Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that pages 16-34 of the memorandum in support of jurisdiction are stricken.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…