STATE v. MUNDT, 105 Ohio St.3d 1457 (2005)

2005-Ohio-900, 823 N.E.2d 875

STATE v. MUNDT.

2005-0192.Supreme Court of Ohio.
March 4, 2005.

Noble C.P. No. 2042002.

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Noble County. On February 23, 2005, this court received a letter from the Noble County Clerk of Courts indicating that the size and nature of the physical exhibits introduced at trial may make the transport of those exhibits to this court difficult and further indicating that a photograph of each exhibit is contained in the record. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the parties are to show cause, within twenty days of the date of this entry, why this court should not dispense with the transport of the physical exhibits to this court.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD. v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC., 53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)

53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…

2 years ago

McCAMMON v. COOPER, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904)

McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…

5 years ago

BANK OF AM., N.A. v. SMITH, 2018-Ohio-3638

[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…

7 years ago

STATE v. MARCUM, 2018-Ohio-1009 (2018)

[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…

8 years ago

In re A.F., 2018-Ohio-310 (Oh. App. 1/26/2018)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…

8 years ago

Ohio Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-007

March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…

8 years ago