2011-Ohio-4751, 953 N.E.2d 840
No. 2011-1070.Supreme Court of Ohio.
September 21, 2011.
Warren App. No. CA2010-11-112, 2011-2704.
Motion And Procedural Ruling
The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the following issue set forth in the court of appeals’ entry dated June 6, 2011:
“Must a trial court order the sealing of records in the manner provided in R.C. 2953.32, which requires a one-year waiting period for misdemeanors and a three-year waiting period for felonies, or may the trial court employ R.C. 2953.52(A)(1) and determine that a defendant who has successfully completed the intervention in lieu of conviction program is eligible to have their record sealed immediately upon successful completion of the program?”
The conflict case is State v. Fortado (1996), 108 Ohio App.3d 706, 671 N.E.2d 622.