2006-Ohio-5625
2006-1557.Supreme Court of Ohio.
November 1, 2006.
MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS
In Mandamus. On motion for leave to intervene, answer, and motion for judgment on the pleadings of Ohio Valley Mall Co., and answer and motion to dismiss of respondent. Motion for leave to intervene granted. Motion for judgment on the pleadings granted. Motion to dismiss treated as a motion for judgment on the pleadings and granted. Cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
PFEIFER, J., dissents and would deny the motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings and grant an alternative writ.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…