63 N.E.2d 912
No. 30484Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided October 31, 1945.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Conviction of uttering “obscene or licentious language” — Section 13032, General Code — Words in indictment not obscene of themselves — Innuendo not set forth — Judicial notice of slang words — Word “language” spelled “langauge” in statute — Statute not rendered uncertain and unconstitutional thereby, when — Deprivation of liberty — Apprisement of accusation — Due process — Delegation of legislation — Sections 1, 10 and 16, Article 1, and Section 26, Article II, Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Hardin county.
Mr. Rex W. Hanna, prosecuting attorney, for appellee.
Mr. Roy Warren Roof and Mr. Fred W. Markley, for appellant.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, BELL, WILLIAMS, TURNER, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.
Page 93