643 N.E.2d 1113

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. SOLOMON, APPELLANT.

No. 94-2055Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted November 29, 1994 —
Decided December 23, 1994.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 13160.

According to the parties, appellant, John C. Solomon, was convicted of four counts of abduction, with firearm specifications. He successfully appealed, but was retried and again convicted on all counts. Solomon appealed with the aid of court-appointed counsel. The court of appeals affirmed his convictions.

Subsequently, Solomon filed two pro se motions in the court of appeals. One was captioned “Motion for Delayed Consideration of Ineffective Appellate Counsel,” but actually sought a thirty-day enlargement of time in which to file a motion for delayed reconsideration. The other asked the court of appeals to provide Solomon with copies of all papers filed in his appeal, such as briefs, motions, and journal entries, since the appointment of counsel; he claimed to need these papers to pursue his appeal to this court and to prosecute a motion for delayed reconsideration in the court of appeals. The court of appeals denied both of Solomon’s motions. Solomon appeals the denial.

Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Carley J. Ingram, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

John C. Solomon, pro se.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in the opinion of the court of appeals, that court’s judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

Page 351

Tagged: