2007-Ohio-1986

Stewart v. Lake Cty. Historical Soc, Inc.

No. 2006-2029.Supreme Court of Ohio.
May 2, 2007.

Lake App. No. 2004-L-164, 2006-Ohio-4822.

Motion and Procedural Rulings
Proposition of Law No. I is no longer held for the decision in 2006-0189, Uddin v. Embassy Suites Hotel, Franklin App. No. 04AP-754, 165 Ohio App.3d 699, 2005-Ohio-6613.

Proposition of Law No. I is no longer to be briefed in accordance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Propositions of Law Nos. I and III are now held for the decision in 2007-0288 and 2007-0410, Ahmad v. AK Steel Corp., Butler App. No. CA2006-04-089, 2006-Ohio-7031, and briefing schedule is stayed.

MOYER, C.J., and O’CONNOR, J., would dismiss Proposition of Law No. III as having been improvidently accepted.

PFEIFER, J., would dismiss Propositions of Law Nos. I and III as having been improvidently accepted.

Tagged: