2004-Ohio-7020Supreme Court of Ohio. Case Announcements and Administrative Actions, December 27, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW 2004-1683. Ohio Elections Commission v. Ohio Chamber ofCommerce. Franklin App. Nos. 03AP-1121 and 03AP-1137, 2004-Ohio-5253. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this case, the […]
Articles Tagged: 2004-Ohio-7020
OHIO ELECTIONS COMM. v. OHIO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1435 (2004)
2004-Ohio-7020, 819 N.E.2d 1120 Ohio Elections Commission v. Ohio Chamber of Commerce. No. 2004-1683.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 27, 2004. Franklin App. Nos. 03AP-1121 and 03AP-1137, 2004-Ohio-5253. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this case, the court declines jurisdiction to hear the case, dissolves the stay of […]
MOTION PROCEDURAL RULINGS, Unpublished Decision (12-27-2004)
2004-Ohio-7020Supreme Court of Ohio. Case Announcements and Administrative Actions, December 27, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In re Extension of filing Deadline. It appearing to the court that a weather emergency precluded mail delivery to the Supreme Court Clerk’s Office on Thursday, December […]
IN RE EXTENSION OF FILING DEADLINE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1435 (2004)
2004-Ohio-7020, 819 N.E.2d 1119 In re Extension of filing Deadline. Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 27, 2004. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS It appearing to the court that a weather emergency precluded mail delivery to the Supreme Court Clerk’s Office on Thursday, December 23, 2004, IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that documents […]
MOSS v. MOYER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1435 (2004)
2004-Ohio-7020, 819 N.E.2d 1119 Moss v. Moyer. No. 2004-2106.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 27, 2004. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On Petition to Contest Election. This cause originated in this court on the filing of an election contest petition under R.C. 3515.09. Upon consideration of the motion for admission pro hac vice of Peter Peckarsky, […]