2004-Ohio-7079, 819 N.E.2d 1121 State v. Nelson. No. 2004-2009.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 28, 2004. Cuyahoga App. No. 84108, 2004-Ohio-5608. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.
Articles Tagged: 2004-Ohio-7079
RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS, Unpublished Decision (12-28-2004)
2004-Ohio-7079Supreme Court of Ohio. December 28, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS 2000-2119. State v. Yarbrough. Jefferson C.P. No. 99-CR-116. Reported at 104 Ohio St.3d 1, 2004-Ohio-6087, 817 N.E.2d 845. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents. 2003-2169. Dayton Bar Assn. […]
STATE v. WASHATKA, 104 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2004)
2004-Ohio-7079, 819 N.E.2d 1121 State v. Washatka. No. 2004-1971.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 28, 2004. Cuyahoga App. No. 83679, 2004-Ohio-5384. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. YARBROUGH, 104 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2004)
2004-Ohio-7079, 819 N.E.2d 1121 State v. Yarbrough. No. 2000-2119.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 28, 2004. Jefferson C.P. No. 99-CR-116. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 104 Ohio St.3d 1, 2004-Ohio-6087, 817 N.E.2d 845. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents.
IN RE $22,161 UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2004)
2004-Ohio-7079, 819 N.E.2d 1121 In re $22,161 United States Currency. No. 2004-1404.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 28, 2004. Hamilton App. No. C-030767. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 104 Ohio St.3d 1409, 2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 711. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
MOTION PROCEDURAL RULINGS, Unpublished Decision (12-28-2004)
2004-Ohio-7079Supreme Court of Ohio. December 28, 2004. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS 2004-1765. State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v.Youngstown. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion […]
DAYTON BAR ASSN. v. PARKER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2004)
2004-Ohio-7079, 819 N.E.2d 1121 Dayton Bar Assn. v. Parker. No. 2003-2169.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 28, 2004. Reported at 104 Ohio St.3d 117, 2004-Ohio-6236, 818 N.E.2d 684. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for stay of judgment or motion to reconsider and motion for leave to file answer. Motions denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents and […]
VINDICATOR PRINTING CO. v. YOUNGSTOWN, 104 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2004)
2004-Ohio-7079, 819 N.E.2d 1120 State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v. Youngstown. No. 2004-1765.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 28, 2004. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion to consolidate with Supreme Court Case […]
MOSS v. MOYER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2004)
2004-Ohio-7079, 819 N.E.2d 1121 Moss v. Moyer. No. 2004-2106.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 28, 2004. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On Petition to Contest Election. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition to contest an election under R.C. 3515.08 et seq. The court has previously acknowledged the applicability of a […]
COFFMAN v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP., 104 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2004)
2004-Ohio-7079, 819 N.E.2d 1121 Coffman v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp. No. 2004-2087.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 28, 2004. In Quo Warranto. On motion for stay of court of common pleas’ proceedings. Motion denied. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS