2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 575 STATE EX REL. SELLARDS v. INDUS. COMM. No. 2005-0019.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 25, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-987, 2004-Ohio-6604. MEDIATION REFERRALS
Articles Tagged: 2005-Ohio-235
STATE EX REL. BANDLOW v. LeBARRON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1457 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 575 STATE EX REL. BANDLOW v. LeBARRON. No. 2004-1832.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. Page 1458
STATE v. JOHNSON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. JOHNSON. No. 2004-1673.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83117, 2004-Ohio-4229. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept on Proposition of Law VI.
STATE v. TRI-STATE GROUP, INC., 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. TRI-STATE GROUP, INC. No. 2004-1650.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Belmont App. No. 03 BE 61, 2004-Ohio-4441. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and LANZINGER, J., dissent.
STATE EX REL. JORDAN v. MARSH, 104 Ohio St.3d 1457 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 575 STATE EX REL. JORDAN v. MARSH. No. 2004-1751.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Motion to strike and motions to amend dismissed as moot. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL […]
STATE v. HUMPHREY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 STATE v. HUMPHREY. No. 2004-2027.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Crawford App. No. 3-04-15. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. LAND, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. LAND. No. 2004-1718.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040294. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1462
STATE v. ROELLE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. ROELLE. No. 2004-1722.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83687, 2004-Ohio-4352. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent and would accept on Proposition of Law IV and remand for the application of State v. Jordan, 104 Ohio St.3d 21, 2004-Ohio-6085, […]
STATE v. GLASS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. GLASS. No. 2004-1597.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Auglaize App. No. 2-04-01, 2004-Ohio-4402. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., dissents.
ECKEL v. SWANTON TWP. BD. OF TRUSTEES, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 ECKEL v. SWANTON TWP. BD. OF TRUSTEES. No. 2004-1703.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-03-1289, 2004-Ohio-4855. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents. LANZINGER, J., not participating.
STATE v. ROBINSON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. ROBINSON. No. 2004-1758.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83508, 2004-Ohio-4483. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
KRAUS v. PUT-IN-BAY TWP. BD. OF ZONING APPEALS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 KRAUS v. PUT-IN-BAY TWP. BD. OF ZONING APPEALS. No. 2004-1744.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Ottawa App. No. OT-04-011, 2004-Ohio-4678. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent.
STATE v. PETRALIA, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. PETRALIA. No. 2004-1890.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Lake App. No. 2001-L-101, 2003-Ohio-1745. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. MEYERS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. MEYERS. No. 2004-1353.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Summit App. No. 21874, 2004-Ohio-6596. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. McKINNEY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 STATE v. McKINNEY. No. 2004-2060.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Defiance App. No. 4-04-12, 2004-Ohio-5518. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
CHURCH MUT. INS. CO. v. CANO, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 CHURCH MUT. INS. CO. v. CANO. No. 2004-1658.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Preble App. No. CA2003-10-019. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. WALKER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. WALKER. No. 2004-1581.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030252, 2004-Ohio-4364. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE EX REL. FISHER v. CLEVELAND, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 STATE EX REL. FISHER v. CLEVELAND. No. 2004-1726.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83945, 2004-Ohio-4345. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
HALE v. VOLUNTEERS OF AM., 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 HALE v. VOLUNTEERS OF AM. No. 2004-1701.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-020839, 2004-Ohio-4508. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
STATE EX REL. DAYTON NEWSPAPER, INC. v. PETRO, 104 Ohio St.3d 1457 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 575 STATE EX REL. DAYTON NEWSPAPER, INC. v. PETRO. No. 2004-1351.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion for leave to intervene, motion for judgment on the pleadings, and answer of Household International, Inc., Household Finance Corp. and Beneficial of Ohio, Inc., and respondent’s […]
STATE v. ROSE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. ROSE. No. 2004-1620.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Delaware App. No. 04-CA-C-04-027, 2004-Ohio-4433. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. WILHELM, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. WILHELM. No. 2004-1687.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Knox App. No. 03CA000037, 2004-Ohio-4606. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.
BADGER v. McGREGOR, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 BADGER v. McGREGOR. No. 2004-1548.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-167, 2004-Ohio-4036. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. RESNICK, PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. Cross-appeal not accepted. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.
BOSTON v. SEALMASTER INDUSTRIES, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 BOSTON v. SEALMASTER INDUSTRIES. No. 2004-1609.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Erie App. No. E-03-040, 2004-Ohio-4278. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., not participating.
HANS v. WESTCHESTER FIRE INS. CO., 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 HANS v. WESTCHESTER FIRE INS. CO. No. 2004-1686.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030603. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
KLEIN v. MOORE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 575 KLEIN v. MOORE. No. 2004-2014.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Thomas Klein. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE EX REL. CULGAN v. COLLIER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 575 STATE EX REL. CULGAN v. COLLIER. No. 2004-1856.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
JOHNSON v. MICROSOFT CORP., 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 JOHNSON v. MICROSOFT CORP. No. 2004-0304.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-020564, 2004-Ohio-761. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for admission pro hac vice of Norman Hawker and Albert A. Foer by Mark D. Tucker. Motion granted. PFEIFER, J., not participating.
LIMA FORD, INC. v. AUBIN, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 LIMA FORD, INC. v. AUBIN. No. 2004-1670.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Allen App. No. 1-04-03, 2004-Ohio-4399. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE J.L., 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 IN RE J.L. No. 2004-2065.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84368, 2004-Ohio-6024. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE ESTATE OF FRAELICH, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 IN RE ESTATE OF FRAELICH. No. 2004-1700.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2000-T-0016, 2004-Ohio-4538. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
HOAGLIN HOLDINGS, LTD. v. GOLIATH MORTGAGE, INC., 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 HOAGLIN HOLDINGS, LTD. v. GOLIATH MORTGAGE, INC. No. 2004-1693.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83657, 2004-Ohio-3473. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
LAUTENSCHLEGER v. MONARCH MGT., INC., 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 LAUTENSCHLEGER v. MONARCH MGT., INC. No. 2004-1725.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Tuscarawas App. No. 2003AP120090, 2004-Ohio-4670. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent.
IN RE RESIGNATION OF SLABAUGH, 104 Ohio St.3d 1454 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 572 IN RE RESIGNATION OF SLABAUGH. No. 2004-2021.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 24, 2005. DISCIPLINARY CASES On affidavit of resignation from the practice of law of William Franklin Slabaugh, Attorney Registration No. 0013009, and on report filed under seal by Disciplinary Counsel. Resignation accepted with disciplinary action pending.
BOARD OF EDUCATION v. BOARD OF REVISION, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 579 LAKOTA LOCAL SCHOOL DIST. BD. OF EDN. v. BUTLER CTY. BD. OF REVISION. No. 2005-0090.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 27, 2005. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1840. MEDIATION REFERRALS
NEDEA v. STATE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 NEDEA v. STATE. No. 2004-2062.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Romulus Nedea. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
SIDENSTRICKER v. MILLER PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 SIDENSTRICKER v. MILLER PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, INC. No. 2004-1739.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-827, 2004-Ohio-4653. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2004-1169, Jones v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Co., Summit App. No. 21724, 2004-Ohio-2821; and briefing schedule stayed. RESNICK and […]
STATE v. WADE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. WADE. No. 2004-1753.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-774, 2004-Ohio-3974. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion to consolidate, motion to stay, and motion for bail denied as moot. LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal.
EWING v. UNIV. OF AKRON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 EWING v. UNIV. OF AKRON. No. 2004-1672.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Summit App. No. 22005, 2004-Ohio-4442. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
BELL v. BERRYMAN, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 BELL v. BERRYMAN. No. 2004-1780.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-500, 2004-Ohio-4708. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. LINDSEY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. LINDSEY. No. 2004-1657.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Brown App. No. CA2003-07-010, 2004-Ohio-4407. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
CINCINNATI GAS ELEC. CO. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM., 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 CINCINNATI GAS ELECTRIC CO. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM. No. 2004-0563.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Public Utilities Commission, No. 01-2164-EL-ORD. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for admission pro hac vice of James H. Bolin by Paul A. Colbert. Motion granted.
STATE EX REL. DRAKE v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 575 STATE EX REL. DRAKE v. CUYAHOGA CTY. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. No. 2004-1938.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Relator’s motion for summary judgment denied as moot. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR […]
MORRIS v. ANDROS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 MORRIS v. ANDROS. No. 2004-1704.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Summit App. Nos. 21861 and 21867, 2004-Ohio-4446. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
WRINKLE v. COTTON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 WRINKLE v. COTTON. No. 2004-1649.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Lorain App. No. 03CA008401, 2004-Ohio-4335. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE EX REL. MARKUS v. INDUS. COMM., 104 Ohio St.3d 1457 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 574 STATE EX REL. MARKUS v. INDUS. COMM. No. 2004-1337.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 25, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-249, 2004-Ohio-3383. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the amended joint application for dismissal, IT […]
STATE v. CUMMINGS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 STATE v. CUMMINGS. No. 2004-1678.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83759, 2004-Ohio-4470. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. CRAUN, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. CRAUN. No. 2004-1669.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Shelby App. No. 17-03-22, 2004-Ohio-4403. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1461
WEIDLE v. LEIST, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 WEIDLE v. LEIST. No. 2004-1732.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20296, 2004-Ohio-4693. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE BROWN, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 IN RE BROWN. No. 2004-2093.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Darke App. No. 04-CA-1651. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
STEGALL v. CROSSMAN, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STEGALL v. CROSSMAN. No. 2004-1737.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20306, 2004-Ohio-4691. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE EX REL. PLAIN DEALER PUB. CO. v. CLEVELAND, 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 STATE EX REL. PLAIN DEALER PUBLISHING CO. v. CLEVELAND. No. 2004-0448.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion to strike the affidavits submitted […]
STATE EX REL. RABIN v. DAVIS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1456 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 574 STATE EX REL. RABIN v. DAVIS. No. 2004-1153.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 24, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20472. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the […]
KRAMER v. ESTATE OF ANZELLOTTI, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 KRAMER v. ESTATE OF ANZELLOTTI. No. 2004-1730.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 03 MA 217, 2004-Ohio-4906. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE EX REL. BROWN v. HANCOCK CTY. PROSECUTOR, 104 Ohio St.3d 1456 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 574 STATE EX REL. BROWN v. HANCOCK CTY. PROSECUTOR. No. 2004-2071.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 24, 2005. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court […]
SMITH v. LEIS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 SMITH v. LEIS. No. 2004-1104.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040273. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Sua sponte, the court orders the parties to brief the following issue: “Is […]
STATE v. JACKSON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. JACKSON. No. 2004-1759.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83420, 2004-Ohio-4467. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. TANNER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. TANNER. No. 2004-1716.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Muskingum App. No. CT2004-0007, 2004-Ohio-4771. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE EX REL. McBRIDE v. UNITED HOME CARE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 579 STATE EX REL. McBRIDE v. UNITED HOME CARE. No. 2005-0056.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 27, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-114, 2004-Ohio-6614. MEDIATION REFERRALS
CUYAHOGA FALLS v. SZAKAL, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 CUYAHOGA FALLS v. SZAKAL. No. 2004-1507.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Summit App. No. 22117. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. EARHART, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. EARHART. No. 2004-1768.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030526, 2004-Ohio-4791. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CHANDLER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. CHANDLER. No. 2004-1802.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-700. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
ST. EX REL. MOORE v. CUYAHOGA METRO. HOUS. AUTH., 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 575 STATE EX REL. MOORE v. CUYAHOGA METRO. HOUS. AUTH. No. 2004-1847.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. GRAHAM, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. GRAHAM. No. 2004-1601.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Allen App. No. 1-04-27, 2004-Ohio-4397. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE EX REL. SHERRY v. INDUS. COMM., 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 579 STATE EX REL. SHERRY v. INDUS. COMM. No. 2005-0100.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 27, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-78, 2004-Ohio-7050. MEDIATION REFERRALS
PREFERRED CAPITAL, INC. v. STURGILL, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 PREFERRED CAPITAL, INC. v. STURGILL. No. 2004-1680.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Summit App. No. 21787, 2004-Ohio-4453. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
LINES v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 LINES v. ASHTABULA AREA CITY SCHOOL DIST. BD. OF EDN. No. 2004-1685.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Ashtabula App. No. 2003-A-0062, 2004-Ohio-4535. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE GEER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1454 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 572 IN RE GEER. No. 2004-2073.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 24, 2005. DISCIPLINARY CASES On December 16, 2004, and pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A), the Secretary of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio submitted to this court a certified copy of a determination […]
MASNY v. RHODES, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 MASNY v. RHODES. No. 2004-1694.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 02 CA 241, 2004-Ohio-4817. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CROSBY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. CROSBY. No. 2004-1747.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-03-1158, 2004-Ohio-4674. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents. LANZINGER, J., not participating.
STATE v. ESPINAL, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 STATE v. ESPINAL. No. 2004-2042.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030925. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. BLEDSOE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. BLEDSOE. No. 2004-1746.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Stark App. No. 2003-CA-00403, 2004-Ohio-4764. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated for argument and decision with 2004-1325, State v. Chandler, Stark App. No. 2003-CA-00342, 2004-Ohio-3436. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. Page 1460
STATE v. ADAMS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. ADAMS. No. 2004-1653.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030559. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. LEONARD, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. LEONARD. No. 2004-1263.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030492, 2004-Ohio-3323. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal and crossappeal not accepted.
STATE v. CARLEY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. CARLEY. No. 2004-1932.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 81001, 2004-Ohio-1901 and 2004-Ohio-5479. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
PERRY v. UNIV. HOSP. OF CLEVELAND, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 PERRY v. UNIV. HOSP. OF CLEVELAND. No. 2004-1728.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83034, 2004-Ohio-4098. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. STALLINGS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. STALLINGS. No. 2004-1667.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Summit App. No. 21969, 2004-Ohio-4571. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. O’CONNOR, J., not participating.
KNISLEY v. BRAY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 KNISLEY v. BRAY. No. 2004-1733.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-887, 2004-Ohio-4553. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE EX REL. DICKINSON v. DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 575 STATE EX REL. DICKINSON v. DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL. No. 2004-1833.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
IN RE ENFORCEMENT OF DR 2-101(A)(3), 104 Ohio St.3d 1456 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 574 IN RE ENFORCEMENT OF DR 2-101(A)(3). Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 24, 2005. MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS In re Enforcement of DR 2-101(A)(3): ORDER Whereas this court is vested with the authority to regulate the practice of law in this state pursuant to Section 2(B), Article 4, Ohio Constitution, It is hereby […]
STATE v. SCOTT-HOOVER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. SCOTT-HOOVER. No. 2004-1695.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Crawford App. No. 3-04-11, 2004-Ohio-4804. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. TODD, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. TODD. No. 2004-1767.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Clermont App. No. CA2003-10-088. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE EX REL. CINCINNATI ENQUIRER v. RINGLAND, 104 Ohio St.3d 1457 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 575 STATE EX REL. CINCINNATI ENQUIRER v. RINGLAND. No. 2004-1826.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On answer of respondents and motion for leave to file motion to dismiss of amicus curiae The Glenn Weaver Institute of Law and Psychiatry. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause […]
STATE v. CROSS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. CROSS. No. 2004-1628. Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Highland App. No. 04CA1, 2004-Ohio-4360. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
NON-EMPLOYEES v. CHATEAU ESTATES, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 NON-EMPLOYEES OF CHATEAU ESTATES RESIDENT ASSN. v. CHATEAU ESTATES, LTD. No. 2004-1630.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Clark App. No. 2004 CA 19 and 2004 CA 20, 2004-Ohio-3781. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE McAULIFFE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1455 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 572 IN RE McAULIFFE. No. 2004-2143.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 24, 2005. DISCIPLINARY CASES On December 28, 2004, and pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(3), the Secretary of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio certified to the Supreme Court a certified copy of a […]
PARKER v. CLEVELAND PUBLIC LIBRARY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 PARKER v. CLEVELAND PUBLIC LIBRARY. No. 2004-1781.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83666, 2004-Ohio-4492. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent. Page 1463
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS, Unpublished Decision (1-24-2005)
2005-Ohio-235 MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS. Supreme Court of Ohio. January 24, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS In re Enforcement of DR 2-101(A)(3): ORDER Whereas this court is vested with the authority to regulate the practice of law in this state pursuant to Section 2(B), Article 4, Ohio […]
RAHAWANGI v. ALSAMMAN, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 RAHAWANGI v. ALSAMMAN. No. 2004-1624.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83643, 2004-Ohio-4083. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE v. SWINNING, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. SWINNING. No. 2004-1749.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Richland App. No. 03-CA-74, 2004-Ohio-5005. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. SANTIAGO, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. SANTIAGO. No. 2004-1966.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 02AP-1094, 2003-Ohio-2877. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
CLARK v. RISKO, 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 CLARK v. RISKO. No. 2004-0284.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Knox App. No. 03CA14, 2003-Ohio-7272. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for substitution of party Patricia L. Clark, deceased, by Carmen Comer. Motion granted.
LYNCH v. HAGUE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 575 LYNCH v. HAGUE. No. 2004-1942.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. CUNNINGHAM, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. CUNNINGHAM. No. 2004-1858.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Miami App. No. 2003 CA 17, 156 Ohio App.3d 714, 2004-Ohio-1935. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. MILLER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 STATE v. MILLER. No. 2004-1665.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Crawford App. No. 3-03-26, 2004-Ohio-1947. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE EX REL. CINCINNATI ENQUIRER v. ADCOCK, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 579 STATE EX REL. CINCINNATI ENQUIRER v. ADCOCK. No. 2005-0068.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 27, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040064, 2004-Ohio-7130. MEDIATION REFERRALS
NOSAL v. SZABO, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 577 NOSAL v. SZABO. No. 2004-1676.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 83974 and 93975, 2004-Ohio-4076. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
DOLIS v. TALLMADGE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 DOLIS v. TALLMADGE. No. 2004-1702.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Summit App. No. 21803, 2004-Ohio-4454. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal not accepted. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the cross-appeal.
STATE v. LOWE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. LOWE. No. 2004-1708.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 82997, 2004-Ohio-4622. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW