2005-Ohio-2447 ROBERTSON v. ROBERTS. No. 2005-0299.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2003-T-0125, 2004-Ohio-7231. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents.
Articles Tagged: 2005-Ohio-2447
IN RE ADOPTION OF MARIE, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 IN RE ADOPTION OF BRIANNA MARIE D. No. 2005-0609.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-04-1367, 2005-Ohio-797. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., dissents.
STATE v. JENKINS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1561 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. JENKINS. No. 2005-0380.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Summit App. No. 22008, 2005-Ohio-11. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; […]
STATE v. FERGUSON, 105 Ohio St.3d 1560 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. FERGUSON. No. 2005-0339.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040114, 2004-Ohio-7132. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; […]
NORWOOD v. HORNEY, 105 Ohio St.3d 1559 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 NORWOOD v. HORNEY. No. 2005-0227.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040683. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-0228, Norwood v. Gamble, Hamilton App. No. C-040783, for briefing, argument, and decision. RESNICK, J., dissents. On motion for admission pro hac vice of William H. Meller, […]
CUYAHOGA CTY. VETERANS SERV. COMM. v. STATE, 105 Ohio St.3d 1565 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 CUYAHOGA CTY. VETERANS SERV. COMM. v. STATE. No. 2004-2136.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-1251, 2004-Ohio-6124. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1470, 2005-Ohio-1186, 824 N.E.2d 540. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE EX REL. AM. CHURCH BUILDERS v. HOLBROOK, 105 Ohio St.3d 1557 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE EX REL. AM. CHURCH BUILDERS, L.L.C. v. HOLBROOK. No. 2005-0504.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Procedendo. On answer of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STEWART v. STEWART, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STEWART v. STEWART. No. 2005-0455.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Portage App. Nos. 2003-P-0094 and 2003-P-0122, 2005-Ohio-346. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. SPIRKO, 105 Ohio St.3d 1558 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. SPIRKO. No. 1989-0722.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Van Wert App. No. 15-84-22. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to set execution date. Motion granted. Execution to be carried out on September 20, 2005.
MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS, Unpublished Decision (5-25-2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS. Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS 2002-2241. State v. Monroe, 2005-Ohio-2282. Franklin C.P. No. 01CR04-2118. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. 2003-0804. Cleveland Mun. School […]
STATE v. HARDY, 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. HARDY. No. 2005-0325.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84701, 2005-Ohio-114. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., not participating. Page 1563
STATE v. MORALES, 105 Ohio St.3d 1559 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. MORALES. No. 2005-0296.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Lake App. No. 2003-L-025, 2004-Ohio-7239. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. Page 1560 III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]
DESKINS v. BD. OF LICKING CTY. COMMRS., 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 DESKINS v. BD. OF LICKING CTY. COMMRS. No. 2005-0387.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Licking App. No. 04CA52, 2005-Ohio-83. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent. Page 1564
STATE v. GOINS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1561 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. GOINS. No. 2005-0064.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2004-01-004. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
RFC CAPITAL CORP. v. EARTHLINK, INC., 105 Ohio St.3d 1561 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 RFC CAPITAL CORP. v. EARTHLINK, INC. No. 2005-0277.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-735, 2004-Ohio-7046. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. Discretionary cross-appeal not accepted. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent. LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the cross-appeal on Propositions of […]
STATE EX REL. HOWARD v. INDUS. COMM., 105 Ohio St.3d 1558 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE EX REL. HOWARD v. INDUS. COMM. No. 2003-1572.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. No. 97AP-860. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for nunc pro tunc correction of the court’s March 28, 2005 entry. Motion denied. Motion of Industrial Commission of Ohio to strike appellant’s motion denied as moot.
STATE v. BYRD, 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. BYRD. No. 2005-0373.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85421. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
CLEVELAND v. BADOCK, 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 CLEVELAND v. BADOCK. No. 2005-0303.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84163, 2004-Ohio-6625. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
WHITAKER v. M.T. AUTOMOTIVE, INC., 105 Ohio St.3d 1560 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 WHITAKER v. M.T. AUTOMOTIVE, INC. No. 2005-0331.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Summit App. No. 21836, 2004-Ohio-7166. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted, RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Thomas D. Domonoske by Ronald L. Burdge. Motion granted.
ARMENTROUT v. TOKIO MARINE FIRE INS. CO., 105 Ohio St.3d 1561 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 ARMENTROUT v. TOKIO MARINE FIRE INS. CO., LTD. No. 2005-0288.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Portage App. No. 2003-P-0134, 159 Ohio App.3d 404, 2004-Ohio-7246, 824 N.E.2d 117. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
CLEVELAND v. COOPER-HILL, 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 CLEVELAND v. COOPER-HILL. No. 2005-0301.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84164, 2004-Ohio-6920. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE EX REL. BOZSIK v. COLLIER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1557 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE EX REL. BOZSIK v. COLLIER. No. 2005-0440.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
PILKINGTON N. AM., INC. v. TRAVELERS CAS. SUR., 105 Ohio St.3d 1558 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 PILKINGTON N. AM., INC. v. TRAVELERS CAS. SUR. CO. No. 2005-0378.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Certified Question of State Law, No. 3:01CV7617. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for admission pro hac vice of Patricia B. Santelle, Peter F. Rosenthal, and Joseph M. Kuffler by David Schaefer. Motion granted.
IN RE ESTATE OF WILKERSON, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 IN RE ESTATE OF WILKERSON. No. 2005-0435.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Summit App. No. 22049, 2005-Ohio-159. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS, Unpublished Decision (5-25-2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS. Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS 2004-0478. State ex rel. S. Rosenthal Co., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. Franklin App. No. 03AP-113, 2004-Ohio-549. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 176, 2005-Ohio-1148, 824 N.E.2d 67. On […]
STATE v. INSKEEP, 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. INSKEEP. No. 2005-0351.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Champaign App. No. 2003 CA 22, 2004-Ohio-4927. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
ARCHITECTURAL INTERIOR PROD. v. MIARER TRANSP., 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 ARCHITECTURAL INTERIOR PROD., INC. v. MIARER TRANSP., INC. No. 2005-0389.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Muskingum App. No. 2004 CA 0027, 2005-Ohio-170. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. KENARD, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. KENARD. No. 2005-0449.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20858. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. ARIAS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. ARIAS. No. 2005-0323.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Lorain App. No. 04CA008428, 2004-Ohio-4443. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
CINCINNATI INS. v. PRESERVING AFFORDABLE HOUSING, 105 Ohio St.3d 1561 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 CINCINNATI INS. CO. v. PRESERVING AFFORDABLE HOUSING, INC. No. 2005-0281.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040006, 2004-Ohio-7128. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion to remand denied as moot. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
AYCOX v. COLUMBUS BD. OF EDN., 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 AYCOX v. COLUMBUS BD. OF EDN. No. 2005-0383.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-1285, 2005-Ohio-69. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CASTILLO, 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. CASTILLO. No. 2005-0315.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84143, 2005-Ohio-93. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
LEWIS v. J.E. WIGGINS CO., 105 Ohio St.3d 1558 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 LEWIS v. J.E. WIGGINS CO. No. 2005-0150.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. Nos. 04AP-469, 04AP-544, and 04AP-668, 2004-Ohio-6724. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause came on for further consideration of appellee’s motion for sanctions for frivolous action and motion for an order declaring appellants vexatious litigators, and appellants’ motion to dismiss […]
CROW v. NATIONWIDE MUT. INS. CO., 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 CROW v. NATIONWIDE MUT. INS. CO. No. 2005-0326.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Fairfield App. No. 04 CA 21, 159 Ohio App.3d 417, 2004-Ohio-7117, 824 N.E.2d 127. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
OHIO CONSUMERS’ COUNSEL v. PUB. UTIL. COMM., 105 Ohio St.3d 1565 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 OHIO CONSUMERS’ COUNSEL v. PUB. UTIL. COMM. No. 2004-1227.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 03-1459-GAA-TA, 94-987-GAA-IR, 96-1113-GAA-TA, and 98-222-GAG-CR. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1211, 2005-Ohio-1023, 823 N.E.2d 872. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. KITZLER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. KITZLER. No. 2005-0508.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Wyandot App. No. 16-04-13, 2005-Ohio-425. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
NORWOOD v. GAMBLE, 105 Ohio St.3d 1559 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 NORWOOD v. GAMBLE. No. 2005-0228.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040783. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-0227, Norwood v. Horney, Hamilton App. No. C-040683, for briefing, argument, and decision. RESNICK, J., dissents. On motions for admission pro hac vice of William H. Mellor, […]
SPEEDWAY SUPER v. GRANVILLE VILLAGE COUNCIL, 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 SPEEDWAY SUPER AM. L.L.C. v. GRANVILLE VILLAGE COUNCIL. No. 2005-0355.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Licking App. No. 04CA51, 2005-Ohio-82. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.
ARFO COLUMBUS v. FRANKLIN CTY. BD. OF REVISION, 105 Ohio St.3d 1558 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 ARFO COLUMBUS, L.L.C. v. FRANKLIN CTY. BD. OF REVISION. No. 2004-1795.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2003-M-1404, 2003-M-1405, 2003-M-1406, 2003-M-1407, 2003-M-1411, and 2003-M-1412. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On joint motion to vacate the decision and order of the Board of Tax Appeals and to remand the cause to […]
IN RE B.L., 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 IN RE B.L. No. 2005-0661.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-1108, 2005-Ohio-1151. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. V.
STATE v. DEAN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. DEAN. No. 2005-0641.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Delaware App. No. 03CA31, 2004-Ohio-1744. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. SCHMIESING, 105 Ohio St.3d 1561 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. SCHMIESING. No. 2005-0182.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Darke App. No. 1640, 2005-Ohio-56. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
BENTON COLUMBUS PART. v. FRANKLIN CTY. B.O.R., 105 Ohio St.3d 1558 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 BENTON COLUMBUS PARTNERS, L.P. v. FRANKLIN CTY. BD. OF REVISION. No. 2004-1796.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2002-J-2341, 2002-J-2342, and 2002-J-2343. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On joint motion to vacate the decision and order of the Board of Tax Appeals and to remand the cause to the Franklin […]
STATE v. PIMENTAL, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. PIMENTAL. No. 2005-0494.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84034, 2005-Ohio-384. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF MATYASZEK, 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF MATYASZEK. No. 2005-0324.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Summit App. No. 21897, 159 Ohio App.3d 424, 2004-Ohio-7167, 824 N.E.2d 132. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II. O’CONNOR, J., not participating.
IN RE BRAY, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 IN RE BRAY. No. 2005-0690.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-842, 2005-Ohio-1540. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents. LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
DISCIPLINARY CASES, Unpublished Decision (5-25-2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 DISCIPLINARY CASES. Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] DISCIPLINARY CASES 2005-0398. Disciplinary Counsel v. Watson. On motion to strike objections and brief in support. Motion denied. Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., dissent.
KRANCEVIC v. McPHERSON, 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 KRANCEVIC v. McPHERSON. No. 2005-0294.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84511, 2004-Ohio-6915. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
GLIDDEN CO. v. LUMBERMENS MUT. CAS. CO., 105 Ohio St.3d 1559 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 GLIDDEN CO. v. LUMBERMENS MUT. CAS. CO. No. 2005-0293.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 81782, 2004-Ohio-6922. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. RESNICK, O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. On motion for admission pro hac vice of H. Christopher Bartolomucci by Kevin M. Young; motion for admission pro hac vice […]
STATE EX REL. WILSON v. OHIO DPT., REHAB./COR., 105 Ohio St.3d 1557 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE EX REL. WILSON v. OHIO DEPT. OF REHAB. CORR. No. 2005-0464.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On answer of respondents. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
LEWIS v. J.E. WIGGINS CO., 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 LEWIS v. J.E. WIGGINS CO. No. 2005-0368.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. Nos. 04AP-469, 04AP-544, and 04AP-668, 2004-Ohio-6724. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
PERFORMANCE TOOL GRP. v. SILVERTON B.O.Z. APP., 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 PERFORMANCE TOOL GROUP, INC. v. SILVERTON BD. OF ZONING APPEALS. No. 2005-0333.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040232, 2004-Ohio-7125. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. ROWLES, 105 Ohio St.3d 1560 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. ROWLES. No. 2005-0371.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Summit App. No. 22007, 2005-Ohio-14. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; […]
S.H.Y., INC. v. GARMAN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 S.H.Y., INC. v. GARMAN. No. 2005-0340.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Union App. No. 14-04-04, 2004-Ohio-7040. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE EX REL. LEWIS v. BENJAMIN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1557 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE EX REL. LEWIS v. BENJAMIN. No. 2005-0470.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
GEHRING v. ARCHDIOCESE OF CINCINNATI, 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 GEHRING v. ARCHDIOCESE OF CINCINNATI. No. 2005-0330.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040259. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
LOBDELL v. LOBDELL, 105 Ohio St.3d 1561 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 LOBDELL v. LOBDELL. No. 2005-0386.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Licking App. No. 2004 CA 0036, 2005-Ohio-80. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2004-1492 and 2004-1647, Estate of Harrold v. Collier, Wayne App. No. 03CA0064, 2004-Ohio-4331; and briefing schedule stayed. RESNICK, J., would accept the appeal […]
IN RE R.K., 105 Ohio St.3d 1561 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 IN RE R.K. No. 2005-0286.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84948, 2004-Ohio-6918. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.
STATE EX REL. CLARK v. STUARD, 105 Ohio St.3d 1557 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE EX REL. CLARK v. STUARD. No. 2005-0496.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
LORINCE v. UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1559 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 LORINCE v. UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS. No. 2005-0103.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83711, 2004-Ohio-6287. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. RESNICK, J., dissents. Discretionary cross-appeal accepted. O’DONNELL, J., would accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. RESNICK, J., dissents.
STATE v. McKINNEY, 105 Ohio St.3d 1561 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. McKINNEY. No. 2004-2060.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Defiance App. No. 4-04-12, 2004-Ohio-5518. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CHAVERS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1558 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. CHAVERS. No. 2005-0600.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Wayne App. No. 04CA0022, 2005-Ohio-714. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent. Page 1559
CHARTER BROADCAST GROUP LTD. v. K-COUNTRY, INC., 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 CHARTER BROADCAST GROUP LTD. v. K-COUNTRY, INC. No. 2005-0359.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Ashland App. No. 04-COA-033, 2005-Ohio-168. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. RESH, 105 Ohio St.3d 1560 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. RESH. No. 2005-0336.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Portage App. No. 2002-P-0074, 2004-Ohio-7220. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-0329, State v. Gondor, Portage App. No. 2002-P-0073, 2004-Ohio-7219, for argument and decision. RESNICK, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. DAY, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. DAY. No. 2005-0437.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 79368, 2005-Ohio-281. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. STILLMAN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1558 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. STILLMAN. No. 2005-0597.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Delaware App. No. 04CAA07052, 2004-Ohio-6974. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. GRAY, 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. GRAY. No. 2005-0384.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84677, 2004-Ohio-7030. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
HAWK v. AM. ELEC. POWER CO., 105 Ohio St.3d 1565 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 HAWK v. AM. ELEC. POWER CO. No. 2005-0186.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Allen App. No. 1-04-65, 2004-Ohio-7042. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 1473, 2005-Ohio-1186, 824 N.E.2d 542. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE EX REL. FRIED v. JONES, 105 Ohio St.3d 1557 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE EX REL. FRIED v. JONES. No. 2005-0465.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On answer and motion for summary judgment of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF RINEHART, 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF RINEHART. No. 2005-0295.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20376. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. PATTERSON, 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. PATTERSON. No. 2005-0306.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Richland App. No. 04 CA 101. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. GONDOR, 105 Ohio St.3d 1560 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. GONDOR. No. 2005-0329.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Portage App. No. 2002-P-0073, 2004-Ohio-7219. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-0336, State v. Resh, Portage App. No. 2002-P-0074, 2004-Ohio-7220, for argument and decision. RESNICK, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE EX REL. HARRIS v. HORVATH, 105 Ohio St.3d 1565 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE EX REL. HARRIS v. HORVATH. No. 2004-1332.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Lorain App. No. 03CA008403. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 185, 2005-Ohio-1149, 824 N.E.2d 76. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE v. JENKINS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. JENKINS. No. 2005-0342.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040111, 2004-Ohio-7131. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
RPM, INC. v. OATEY CO., 105 Ohio St.3d 1559 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 RPM, INC. v. OATEY CO. No. 2005-0652.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Medina App. Nos. 3282-M and 3289-M, 2005-Ohio-1280. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted provided that appellant shows that its statutorily compliant bond posted in 2003-0423, RPM, Inc. v. Oatey Co., remains in […]
OTTAWA HILLS v. AFJEH, 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 OTTAWA HILLS v. AFJEH. No. 2005-0335.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-02-1364, 2004-Ohio-7154. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., not participating.
STATE EX REL. S. ROSENTHAL CO. v. INDUS. COMM., 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE EX REL. S. ROSENTHAL CO., INC. v. INDUS. COMM. No. 2004-0478.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-113, 2004-Ohio-549. Reported at 105 Ohio St.3d 176, 2005-Ohio-1148, 824. Page 1565 N.E.2d 67. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS, Unpublished Decision (5-25-2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS. Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS 2005-0440. State ex rel. Bozsik v. Collier. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell […]
BAUMGARTNER v. FAULKNER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1557 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 BAUMGARTNER v. FAULKNER. No. 2005-0510.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. BUNTING, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. BUNTING. No. 2005-0471.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00259, 2005-Ohio-497. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. GALLOWAY, 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. GALLOWAY. No. 2005-0297.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-05-1024. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. JONES, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. JONES. No. 2005-0444.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Marion App. No. 9-04-53. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
BENJAMIN v. CREDIT GEN. INS. CO., 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 BENJAMIN v. CREDIT GEN. INS. CO. No. 2005-0312.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-1117, 2004-Ohio-7193. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. PFEIFER, J., dissents. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Harold S. Horwich and Stephen M. Hryniewicz by Mark D. Tucker. Motion granted.
STATE v. WARE, 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. WARE. No. 2005-0309.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-43, 2004-Ohio-6984. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
OHIO ASSN., PUB. SCH. EMP. v. SCH. EMP. RET., 105 Ohio St.3d 1562 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 OHIO ASSN. OF PUB. SCHOOL EMP. v. SCHOOL EMP. RETIREMENT SYS. BD. No. 2005-0305.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-136, 2004-Ohio-7101. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal on Propositions of Law Nos. II and III. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. CUNNINGHAM, 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. CUNNINGHAM. No. 2005-0358.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Hancock App. No. 5-04-41. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CURD, 105 Ohio St.3d 1560 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. CURD. No. 2005-0316.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Lake App. No. 2003-L-030, 2004-Ohio-7222. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; […]
APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW, Unpublished Decision (5-25-2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW 2005-0103. Lorince v. Universal Underwriters. Cuyahoga App. No. 83711, 2004-Ohio-6287. Discretionary appeal accepted. Resnick, J., dissents. Discretionary cross-appeal accepted. O’Donnell, J., would accept the cross-appeal on Proposition […]
APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW, Unpublished Decision (5-25-2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW 2004-2060. State v. McKinney. Defiance App. No. 4-04-12, 2004-Ohio-5518. 2004-2097. State v. Franklin. Stark App. No. 2003CA00442, 2004-Ohio-5398. 2005-0064. State v. Goins. Butler App. No. […]
GAUNTT v. JEFFREYS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1557 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 GAUNTT v. JEFFREYS. No. 2005-0607.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Barry Gauntt. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. HARPER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. HARPER. No. 2005-0427.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Franklin App. Nos. 00AP-23, 00AP-24, 00AP-25, 00AP-26, and 00AP-27. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
COLEMAN v. E. CLEVELAND CITY SCH. DIST. B.O.E., 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 COLEMAN v. E. CLEVELAND CITY SCHOOL DIST. BD. OF EDN. No. 2005-0356.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 84328 and 84636, 2004-Ohio-7019. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. FRANKLIN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1561 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. FRANKLIN. No. 2004-2097.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Stark App. No. 2003CA00442, 2004-Ohio-5398. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MOTION PROCEDURAL RULINGS, Unpublished Decision (5-25-2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS 1989-0722. State v. Spirko. Van Wert App. No. 15-84-22. On motion to set execution date. Motion granted. Execution to be carried out on September 20, 2005. 2003-1572. […]
STATE v. SMITH, 105 Ohio St.3d 1564 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. SMITH. No. 2005-0388.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2004-02-039, 2005-Ohio-63. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
OLS v. OLS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1561 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 OLS v. OLS. No. 2005-0274.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85381. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. BEZAK, 105 Ohio St.3d 1560 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE v. BEZAK. No. 2005-0338.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84008, 2004-Ohio-6623. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law I; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1171, State v. Mathis, Cuyahoga App. No. 83311, 2004-Ohio-2982, and 2004-1267, State v. Fair, Cuyahoga App. No. 82278, 2004-Ohio-2971; and […]
TEMPLE v. DAYTON, 105 Ohio St.3d 1563 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 TEMPLE v. DAYTON. No. 2005-0372.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20211, 2005-Ohio-57. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WATSON, 105 Ohio St.3d 1565 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WATSON. No. 2005-0398.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. DISCIPLINARY CASES On motion to strike objections and brief in support. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
STATE EX REL. GREER v. FAULKNER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1557 (2005)
2005-Ohio-2447 STATE EX REL. GREER v. FAULKNER. No. 2005-0515.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 25, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.