2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Wangul. No. 2005-0873.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84698, 2005-Ohio-1175.
Articles Tagged: 2005-Ohio-4605
DEXXON DIGITAL STORAGE, INC. v. HAENSZEL, 106 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 Dexxon Digital Storage, Inc. v. Haenszel. No. 2005-1443.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Delaware App. No. 04CAE11074, 161 Ohio App.3d 747, 2005-Ohio-3187. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of judgment and proceedings before the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas. Motion denied.
STATE v. PRATHER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Prather. No. 2005-0969.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84913, 2005-Ohio-1743. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. UPSHAW, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Upshaw. No. 2005-1047.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Clark App. No. 05CA35. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to orief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Decision and […]
CICCHINI v. STREZA, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 Cicchini v. Streza. No. 2005-0870.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00220, 160 Ohio App.3d 189, 2005-Ohio-1492. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE v. KORBEL, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Korbel. No. 2005-0915.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 05AP-157. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. WALLACE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Wallace. No. 2005-0978.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84808, 160 Ohio App.3d 528, 2005-Ohio-1746. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
STATE v. KREISCHER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Kreischer. No. 2005-0412.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Perry App. No. 03 CA 20, 2004-Ohio-6854. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay and remand. Motion denied. O’CONNOR, J., dissents.
IN RE KUPCHIK, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 In re Kupchik. No. 2005-0456.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84493, 2005-Ohio-23. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1413, 2005-Ohio-3154, 830 N.E.2d 346. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE v. WILLIAMS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Williams. No. 2005-1155.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 82094, 2003-Ohio-4811 and 2005-Ohio-2313. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
SPAFFORD v. CUYAHOGA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 Spafford v. Cuyahoga Community College. No. 2005-0977.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84786, 2005-Ohio-1672. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE B.L., 106 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 In re B.L. No. 2005-0921.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-1108, 2005-Ohio-1151. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1417, 2005-Ohio-3154, 830 N.E.2d 348. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
STATE v. LUCAS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Lucas. No. 2005-1226.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Marion App. No. 9-04-40, 2005-Ohio-1092. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
INDIANA INS. CO. v. FED. INS. CO., 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 Indiana Ins. Co. v. Fed. Ins. Co. No. 2005-0955.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Tuscarawas App. No. 2004AP070056. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. TULLIS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Tullis. No. 2005-1092.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-333, 2005-Ohio-2205. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. 1.
JACKSON v. GREGER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1247 Jackson v. Greger. No. 2005-0905.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20693, 160 Ohio App.3d 258, 2005-Ohio-1588. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. FRANZ, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Franz. No. 2005-0957.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Knox App. No. 04CA000013, 2005-Ohio-1755. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
RAUB v. GARWOOD, 106 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1247 Raub v. Garwood. No. 2005-0832.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Summit App. No. 22210, 2005-Ohio-1279. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents. Page 1504
STATE v. RAMIREZ, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Ramirez. No. 2005-1132.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Medina App. No. 04CA0024-M, 2004-Ohio-6541. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE EX REL. MOSELY v. DEPT. JOB FAM. SERV., 106 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 State ex rel. Mosely v. Cuyahoga Cty. Dept. of Job Family Serv. No. 2005-0740.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. In Mandamus. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1407, 2005-Ohio-3154, 830 N.E.2d 342. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
COOKE v. UNITED DAIRY FARMERS, INC., 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 Cooke v. United Dairy Farmers, Inc. No. 2005-0911.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-817, 2005-Ohio-1539. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. RORIE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1247 State v. Rorie. No. 2005-0917.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Stark App. No. 2002CA00187, 2005-Ohio-1726. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771 State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule stayed. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR […]
STATE v. ROGERS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Rogers. No. 2005-1091.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-705, 2005-Ohio-2202. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
NEW WORLD COMMUNICATIONS OF OHIO, v. WILKINS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 New World Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Wilkins. No. 2005-0658.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2003-A-1732 and 2003-A-1733. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1458, 2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1166. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents. Page 1511
STATE v. MERRIWEATHER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Merriweather. No. 2005-0904.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030948. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. WORRELL, 106 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1247 State v. Worrell. No. 2005-0906.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-410, 2005-Ohio-1521. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and […]
STATE v. BURNS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1247 State v. Burns. No. 2005-0903.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Summit App. No. 22198, 2005-Ohio-1459. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and […]
STATE v. WHILE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. While. No. 2005-1122.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2001-T-0051, 2003-Ohio-4594. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., not participating.
STATE v. HILL, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Hill. No. 2005-0965.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 84846 and 84887, 160 Ohio App.3d 324, 2005-Ohio-1501. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. HARMON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Harmon. No. 2005-0944.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Pickaway App. No. 04CA22, 2005-Ohio-1974. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. HYSLOP, 106 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1247 State v. Hyslop. No. 2005-0910.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-03-1298, 2005-Ohio-1556. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule stayed. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR […]
STATE v. ALLEN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1247 State v. Allen. No. 2005-0876.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Lake App. No. 2004-L-038, 2005-Ohio-1415. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule stayed. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR […]
STATE v. HOUSE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 State v. House. No. 2005-1349.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 78239. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. O’DONNELL, J., not participating.
STATE v. DiCARLO, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. DiCarlo. No. 2005-1208.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 02 CA 228, 2004-Ohio-5118. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE EX REL. CHRISTIAN v. SWEENEY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 State ex rel. Christian v. Sweeney. No. 2005-0795.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. In Mandamus and Prohibition. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1458, 2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1166. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE EX REL. BROWN v. RHODES, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1244 State ex rel. Brown v. Rhodes. No. 2005-1252.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
HAGA v. ALBEX ALUMINUM, INC., 106 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 Haga v. Albex Aluminum, Inc. No. 2005-0705.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Stark App. No. 2003CA00312, 2005-Ohio-1509. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1463, 2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1170. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
MED. PROTECTIVE CO. v. WATSON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 Med. Protective Co. v. Watson. No. 2005-0888.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-915, 2005-Ohio-1452. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.
STATE v. BENSON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Benson. No. 2005-1259.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Marion App. No. 9-04-45, 2005-Ohio-2245. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent. Page 1502
STATE EX REL. BOHANNON v. HEKLER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1244 State ex rel. Bohannon v. Hekler. No. 2005-1166.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would grant and alternative writ.
STATE EX REL. JAMES v. NICHOLS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 835 N.E.2d 379 State ex rel. James v. Nichols. No. 2005-1458.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In Prohibition. On motion for immediate stay pending decision. Motion denied. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE v. WILLIAMS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Williams. No. 2005-1158.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 82364, 2003-Ohio-6342 and 2005-Ohio-2439. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. MASSIE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Massie. No. 2005-0947.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Ottawa App. No. OT-04-007, 2005-Ohio-1678. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
THEOBALD v. UNIV. OF CINCINNATI, 106 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1247 Theobald v. Univ. of Cincinnati. No. 2005-0896.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 02AP-560, 160 Ohio App.3d 342, 2005-Ohio-1510. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. On motion for admission pro hac vice of DOUGLAS C. Holland by James P. Sullivan. Motion granted.
STATE v. DYE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Dye. No. 2005-0942.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040506. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. JOHNSON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Johnson. No. 2005-0882.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Erie App. No. E-05-019. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. MURRAY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Murray. No. 2005-0898.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Ashtabula App. No. 2003-A-0012, 2005-Ohio-1568. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. SMITH, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Smith. No. 2005-0976.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-726, 2005-Ohio-1765. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. KIMBROUGH, 106 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 State v. Kimbrough. No. 2005-0724.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Licking App. Nos. 03CA76 and 03CA78, 2004-Ohio-5429. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1408, 2005-Ohio-3154, 830 N.E.2d 343. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
IN RE JOHNSTON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 In re Johnston. No. 2005-0919.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 05AP-10. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
HARRIS v. MIAMI CTY. SHERIFF’S DEPT., 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 Harris v. Miami Cty. Sheriff’s Dept. No. 2005-0932.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Miami App. No. 2004 CA 29, 160 Ohio App.3d 435, 2005-Ohio-1713. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. FARLEY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Farley. No. 2005-1267.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2004-04-085, 2005-Ohio-2367. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-1164, State v. Farley, Butler App. No. CA2004-04-085, 2005-Ohio-2367; cause held for […]
SMITH v. MIGHTY DISTRIB. OF S.W., PA, INC., 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 Smith v. Mighty Distrib. of S.W. PA, Inc. No. 2005-0964.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0056, 2005-Ohio-1689. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE v. SMITH, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 State v. Smith. No. 2005-1341.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Madison App. No. CA2003-01-002, 2004-Ohio-1862. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
FAIRCHILDS v. MIAMI VALLEY HOSP., 106 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1247 Fairchilds v. Miami Valley Hosp. No. 2005-0929.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Montgomery App. Nos. 20493 and 20542, 160 Ohio App.3d 363, 2005-Ohio-1712. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. Page 1505
SMITH v. FRY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 Smith v. Fry. No. 2005-0869.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Summit App. No. 22217, 2005-Ohio-1470. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents. LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II.
STATE v. COMBS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Combs. No. 2005-1301.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2000-03-047, 2005-Ohio-1923. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, […]
STATE v. CONLEY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Conley. No. 2005-0952.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Medina App. No. 05CA0028-M. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
LONGSDORF v. FLY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 Longsdorf v. Fly. No. 2005-0924.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Madison App. No. CA2004-09-032. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1508
GOTTFRIED v. DEPT. OF REHAB. CORR, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 Gottfried v. Dept. of Rehab. Corr. No. 2005-0991.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Crawford App. No. 3-04-33, 2005-Ohio-1783. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. WARE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 State v. Ware. No. 2005-1313.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Summit App. No. 22232, 2005-Ohio-1822. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. TODD, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Todd. No. 2005-1268.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2004-06-123, 2005-Ohio-2270. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-1117, State v. Todd, Butler App. No. CA2004-06-123, 2005-Ohio-2270; cause held for […]
STATE v. PEET, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Peet. No. 2005-0933.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Medina App. No. 05CA0027-M. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. RICHTER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Richter. No. 2005-1052.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Lake App. No. 2002-L-080, 2003-Ohio-6734. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1510
JOHNSON v. WICKLIFFE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 Johnson v. Wickliffe. No. 2005-0958.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Lake App. No. 2003-L-159, 2005-Ohio-1687. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. McLEAN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. McLean. No. 2005-0900.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Trumbull App. Nos. 2003-T-0117 and 2003-T-0118, 2005-Ohio-1562. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CHRISTIE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 State v. Christie. No. 2005-0528.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Defiance App. No. 4-04-31. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1415, 2005-Ohio-3154, 830 N.E.2d 347. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE v. RAMSEY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Ramsey. No. 2005-0975.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-710, 2005-Ohio-1849. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. FAYNE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 State v. Fayne. No. 2005-1334.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83267, 2004-Ohio-4625. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. TREGO, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Trego. No. 2005-1232.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Ross App. No. 04CA2763, 2004-Ohio-5396 and 2004-Ohio-7287. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF SCHNEIDER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 In re Guardianship of Schneider. No. 2005-1432.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Medina App. No. 05CA0050-M. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS, Unpublished Decision (9-7-2005)
2005-Ohio-4605 Merit Decisions With Opinions. Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS 2004-0343. Vandalia-Butler City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. MontgomeryCty. Bd. of Revision, 2005-Ohio-4385. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2002-V-1596. Decision affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, […]
McGOWAN v. CROSSROADS LAND CO., 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 McGowan v. Crossroads Land Co. No. 2005-0565.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Summit App. No. 22222, 2005-Ohio-598. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1416, 2005-Ohio-3154, 830 N.E.2d 348. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE v. LORRAINE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Lorraine. No. 2005-1216.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2003-T-0159, 2005-Ohio-2529. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On amended motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. RESNICK, J., dissents.
SMITH v. CONLEY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 Smith v. Conley. No. 2005-0247.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00068, 2005-Ohio-1433. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to strike appellant’s merit brief. Motion denied.
STATE v. LUCENTE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Lucente. No. 2005-0885.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 03 MA 216, 2005-Ohio-1657. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. JACKSON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Jackson. No. 2005-1036.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Allen App. No. 1-04-52, 2005-Ohio-1083. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. SMITTLE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 State v. Smittle. No. 2005-1395.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Ross App. No. 05CA2827, 2005-Ohio-3577. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
STATE v. SHERRILLS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 State v. Sherrills. No. 2005-0634.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85873. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1416, 2005-Ohi0-3154, 830 N.E.2d 348. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE v. HOLT, 106 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2005)
833 N.E.2d 1247, 2005-Ohio-4605 State v. Holt. No. 2005-0909.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Erie App. No. E-04-004, 2005-Ohio-1554. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I; cause held for the decision in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and […]
BRADY v. McCAFFREY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 Brady v. McCaffrey. No. 2005-0948.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84866, 2005-Ohio-1197. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. ROGERS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Rogers. No. 2005-0943.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040493. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. McDONALD, 106 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 State v. McDonald. No. 2005-1396.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Ross App. No. 04CA2806, 2005-Ohio-3503. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
STATE v. RICHARD, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Richard. No. 2005-0881.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84798, 2005-Ohio-1185. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. WOODS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Woods. No. 2005-1024.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Medina App. No. 05CA0036-M. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
DOE v. ARCHDIOCESE OF CINCINNATI, 106 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati. No. 2005-0262.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Hamilton App. Nos. C-030900, C-030949, C-030950 and C-040072, 2004-Ohio-7003. Discretionary appeal accepted. Motion to consolidate denied. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2005-0702 and 2005-0734, Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, Shelby App. No. 17-04-10, 2005-Ohio-960. APPEALS […]
CLEMENTS v. OHIO HOSP. INS. CO., 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 Clements v. Ohio Hosp. Ins. Co. No. 2005-0859.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00265, 2005-Ohio-1956. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. LILES, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Liles. No. 2005-0940.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Allen App. No. 1-05-10. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking […]
STATE v. BUTLER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 State v. Butler. No. 2005-1369.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2003-02-032, 2003-Ohio-7213. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.
STATE v. SCARBERRY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1247 State v. Scarberry. No. 2005-0868.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Logan App. No. 8-04-32, 2005-Ohio-1425. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule stayed. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR […]
STATE v. EMRICK, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605 State v. Emrick. No. 2005-0939.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Muskingum App. No. CT2005-0010. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. LEACH, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Leach. No. 2005-1260.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84794, 2005-Ohio-1870. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. VARNEY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Varney. No. 2005-0925.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Ashland App. No. 04-COA-028, 2005-Ohio-1752. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.
A.G. FINANCIAL, INC. v. LaSALLA, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 A.G. Financial, Inc. v. LaSalla. No. 2005-0907.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84880, 2005-Ohio-1504. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE McLEAN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 In re McLean. No. 2005-1198.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2005-T-0018, 2005-Ohio-2576. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
ROBERTS v. REPUBLIC STORAGE SYS. CO., 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 Roberts v. Republic Storage Sys. Co. No. 2005-1015.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00230, 2005-Ohio-1953. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents. LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. v. DAYTON FREIGHT LINES, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 Sherwin Williams Co. v. Dayton Freight Lines. No. 2005-1247.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20651, 161 Ohio App.3d 444, 2005-Ohio-2773. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in […]
STATE EX REL. OH. PATROLMEN’S v. CASTLE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1500 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1244 State ex rel. Ohio Patrolmen’s Benevolent Assn. v. Castle. No. 2005-0817.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
INDIANA INS. CO. v. FARMERS INS. CO. OF COLUMBUS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 Indiana Ins. Co. v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Columbus, Inc. No. 2005-0956.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Tuscarawas App. No. 2004AP070055. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
SIMON v. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INS. CO., 106 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2005)
2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 Simon v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co. No. 2005-0806.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84553, 2005-Ohio-1007. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2004-0574, Henderson v. Lawyers Title Ins. Co., Cuyahoga App. No. 82654, 2004-Ohio-744. […]