2005-Ohio-4605 – Page 2

STATE v. GOINS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 State v. Goins. No. 2005-0809.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 02CA68, 2005-Ohio-1439. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and […]

STATE v. FORSTON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Forston. No. 2005-1032.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85096, 2005-Ohio-2463. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. HILL, 106 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1247 State v. Hill. No. 2005-0890.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84683, 2005-Ohio-1311. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and […]

STATE v. UPSHAW, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Upshaw. No. 2005-1048.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Clark App. No. 05CA35. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents. LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

COMMUNITY HOUS. NETWORK v. STOYER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 Community Hous. Network v. Stoyer. No. 2005-1354.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 05AP-711. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment with waiver of supersedeas bond. Motion denied. RESNICK, J., dissents. Page 1503

STATE EX REL. McGEE v. CRT APS, EIGHTH AP. DIST., 106 Ohio St.3d 1500 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1244 State ex rel. McGee v. Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate Dist. No. 2005-1078.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion for summary judgment and answer of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., […]

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS, Unpublished Decision (9-7-2005)

2005-Ohio-4605 Merit Decisions Without Opinions. Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS 2005-0817. State ex rel. Ohio Patrolmen’s Benevolent Assn. v. Castle. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg […]

STATE v. SMITH, 106 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 State v. Smith. No. 2005-1336.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040348, 2004-Ohio-1325. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

SUPERIOR PIPING CONTRS., INC. v. REILLY IND., 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 Superior Piping Contrs., Inc. v. Reilly Ind., Inc. No. 2005-0962.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84871, 2005-Ohio-1318. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. GRIFFITH, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Griffith. No. 2005-0953.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84760, 2005-Ohio-1500. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., not participating.

STATE v. KREISCHER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1501 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1245 State v. Kreischer. No. 2005-0216.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Perry App. No. 03 CA 20, 2004-Ohio-6854. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay and remand. Motion denied. O’CONNOR, J., dissents.

STATE EX REL. MARTIN v. HUNT, 106 Ohio St.3d 1500 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1244 State ex rel. Martin v. Hunt. No. 2005-1126.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On answer of respondents. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. Page 1501 MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

STATE v. WALKER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Walker. No. 2005-0979.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 86174. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. NAWASH, 106 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 State v. Nawash. No. 2005-1389.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85032, 2005-Ohio-3012. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. PFEIFER, O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. EVANS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Evans. No. 2005-0989.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2003-T-0132, 2005-Ohio-1787. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.

STATE v. HORTON-ALOMAR, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Horton-Alomar. No. 2005-0884.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-744, 2005-1537. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent.

WILDI v. WILDI, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 Wildi v. Wildi. No. 2005-0483.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-576, 159 Ohio App.3d 568, 2005-Ohio-257. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1414, 2005-Ohio-3154, 830 N.E.2d 346. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

STATE v. MARTINEZ, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 State v. Martinez. No. 2005-0864.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Henry App. No. 7-05-01. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE EX REL. MAN. HOME PARK v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, 106 Ohio St.3d 1500 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1244 State ex rel. Lakeside Manufactured Home Park v. Bd. of Trustees of Coventry Twp. No. 2005-0891.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. O’DONNELL, J., […]

BARTHOLOMEW BUILDERS, INC. v. SPIRITOS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 Bartholomew Builders, Inc. v. Spiritos. No. 2005-1017.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2003-T-0027, 2005-Ohio-1900. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. SKAGGS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Skaggs. No. 2005-1160.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Wood App. No. WD-04-002, 2004-Ohio-6653. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2005-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. […]

STRUNA v. CONVENIENT FOOD MART, 106 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 Struna v. Convenient Food Mart. No. 2005-1054.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84886, 160 Ohio App.3d 655, 2005-Ohio-1861. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

WEBSTER v. TIMKEN CO., 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 Webster v. Timken Co. No. 2005-0967.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00260, 2005-Ohio-1759. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

CINCINNATI v. QUEEN CITY LODGE NO. 69, 106 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1249 Cincinnati v. Queen City Lodge No. 69, Fraternal Order of Police. No. 2005-0871.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040454, 2005-Ohio-1560. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

MILLER v. ARCHDIOCESE OF CINCINNATI, 106 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1246 Miller v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati. No. 2005-0263.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Hamilton App. Nos. C-040050, C-040170, C-040171, C-040233 and C-040347. Discretionary appeal accepted. Motion to consolidate denied. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2005-0702 and 2005-0734, Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, Shelby App. No. 17-04-10, 2005-Ohio-960. APPEALS […]

STATE v. STILLMAN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1251 State v. Stillman. No. 2005-0863.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Delaware App. No. 04CAA07052, 2004-Ohio-6974. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1464, 2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1170. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

STATE v. YANG, 106 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Yang. No. 2005-0986.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Summit App. No. 22639. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. MURRAY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2005)

2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250 State v. Murray. No. 2005-0963.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2005. Lake App. No. 2003-L-045, 2005-Ohio-1693. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1509