2005-Ohio-5146 Archives

EISINGER v. NADEAU, 106 Ohio St.3d 1535 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 Eisinger v. Nadeau. 2005-1035.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Wayne App. No. 05CA0025. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept on Proposition of Law No. III.

STATE v. SHERRILLS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1537 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 385 State v. Sherrills. 2004-1523.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84961. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1483, 2005-Ohio-3978, 832 N.E.2d 736. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

STATE v. DAWSON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1535 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 State v. Dawson. 2005-1045.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Pickaway App. No. 04CA16, 2005-Ohio-2276. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

GARRETT v. CLEVELAND, 106 Ohio St.3d 1535 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 384 Garrett v. Cleveland 2005-1072.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84872, 2005-Ohio-1853. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept on Proposition of Law No. I.

HULL v. COLUMBIA GAS OF OHIO, 106 Ohio St.3d 1532 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 Hull v. Columbia Gas of Ohio. 2005-1033.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-04-1149, 160 Ohio App.3d 695, 2005-Ohio-2089. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. BALDEV, 106 Ohio St.3d 1535 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 384 State v. Baldev. 2005-1073.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2004-05-106, 2005-Ohio-2369. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. BRADFORD, 106 Ohio St.3d 1532 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 382 State v. Bradford. 2005-1056.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Lake App. No. 2003-L-168, 2005-Ohio-2070. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2005-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]

JONES v. KETTERING, 106 Ohio St.3d 1534 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 Jones v. Kettering. 2005-1006.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20644, 2005-Ohio-1932. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents.

SANDUSKY DOCK CORP. v. JONES, Unpublished Decision (10-5-2005)

2005-Ohio-5146 Sandusky Dock Corp. v. Jones. No. 2004-0261.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Franklin App. No. 03AP-98, 2003-Ohio-7027. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

STATE v. BRINKLEY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1529 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 379 State v. Brinkley. 2002-2032.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Lucas C.P. No. CR00-2826. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6). Application denied. LANZINGER, J., not participating.

GREEN v. GODWIN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1533 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 382 Bowling Green v. Godwin. 2005-1363.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Wood App. No. WD-04-094, 2005-Ohio-3204. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2005-1560, Bowling Green v. Godwin, Wood App. No. WD-04-094, 2005-Ohio-3204. RESNICK, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. DAVIS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1534 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 State v. Davis. 2005-1030.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 04 MA 211, 2005-Ohio-2118. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1535

STATE v. BELTOWSKI, 106 Ohio St.3d 1532 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 382 State v. Beltowski. 2005-1051.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Lake App. No. 2003-L-126 and 2003-L-150, 2005-Ohio-2075. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking […]

STATE v. KEMP, 106 Ohio St.3d 1534 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 State v. Kemp. 2005-1016.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 04 MA 54, 2005-Ohio-2115. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

STATE v. THOMPSON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1536 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 384 State v. Thompson. 2005-1204.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 86366. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. CORAN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1533 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 382 State v. Coran. 2005-1323.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Clark App. No. 2003-CA-80, 2004-Ohio-6874. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. 1; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]

OHIO DEPT. OF TAXATION v. KUNKLE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1535 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Kunkle. 2005-1039.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Fulton App. No. F-04-025, 2005-Ohio-2092. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. ZINN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1536 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 384 State v. Zinn. 2005-1100.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Stark App. No. 2005CA00105. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

PASCO v. STATE AUTO. MUT. INS. CO., 106 Ohio St.3d 1536 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 384 Pasco v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. 2005-1186.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-696, 2005-Ohio-2387. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

ROSE v. OHIO DEPT. OF JOB FAMILY SERV., 106 Ohio St.3d 1534 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 Rose v. Ohio Dept. of Job Family Serv. 2005-1000.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Warren App. No. CA2004-06-069, 160 Ohio App.3d 581, 2005-Ohio-1804. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

GLIDDEN CO. v. LUMBERMENS MUT. CAS. CO., 106 Ohio St.3d 1529 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 379 Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. 2005-0293.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 81782, 2004-Ohio-6922. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for admission pro hac vice of Cort Malone by Drew A. Carson. Motion granted.

STATE v. HINES, 106 Ohio St.3d 1537 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 384 State v. Hines. 2005-1346.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83485, 2004-Ohio-5206 and 2005-Ohio-3129. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

DEETER v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORP., 106 Ohio St.3d 1534 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 Deeter v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. 2005-1010.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20686, 2005-Ohio-1931. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

FARMER v. ESTATE OF MILES, 106 Ohio St.3d 1533 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 Farmer v. Estate of Miles. 2005-0999.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2004-06-140. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1534

MORO v. ABDEL-RAHMAN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1534 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 Moro v. Abdel-Rahman. 2005-1028.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-723, 2005-Ohio-1022. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion to dismiss denied as moot.

HORTMAN v. MIAMISBURG, 106 Ohio St.3d 1533 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 382 Hortman v. Miamisburg. 2005-1351.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20664, 161 Ohio App.3d 559, 2005-Ohio-2862. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I and cause consolidated with 2005-1361, Hortman v. Miamisburg, Montgomery App. No. 20664, 161 Ohio App.3d 559, 2005-Ohio-2862. MOYER, C.J., […]

RAMEY v. QUALITY MOLD, INC., 106 Ohio St.3d 1535 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 384 Ramey v. Quality Mold, Inc. 2005-1068.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Huron App. No. H-04-025, 2005-Ohio-2211. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

WOLDER v. DiPASQUALE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1536 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 384 Wolder v. DiPasquale. 2005-1238.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20797, 2005-Ohio-2010. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1537

THORNTON v. SALAK, 106 Ohio St.3d 1531 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 381 Thornton v. Salak. 2005-0880.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Vairfield App. Nos. 03 CA 63 and 03 CA 64, 2005-Ohio-1612. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. O’CONNOR, J., would accept on Proposition of Law No. I only. Discretionary cross-appeal not accepted. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. RESNICK, J., […]

LUTZ v. McBRIDE, 106 Ohio St.3d 1537 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 385 Lutz v. McBride. 2005-1011.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. In Prohibition. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1477, 2005-Ohio-3978, 832 N.E.2d 732. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS

STATE v. KLEIN, 106 Ohio St.3d 1533 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 382 State v. Klein. 2005-0973.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040176, 2005-Ohio-1761. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and O’CONNOR, J., dissent.

BAKER v. LUCAS CTY. DEPT. OF JOB FAMILY SERV., 106 Ohio St.3d 1533 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 Baker v. Lucas Cty. Dept. of Job Family Serv. 2005-0985.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-04-1220, 2005-Ohio-1028. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. HAGWOOD, 106 Ohio St.3d 1535 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 384 State v. Hagwood. 2005-1065.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-879. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents.

STATE v. DAVIS, 106 Ohio St.3d 1536 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 384 State v. Davis. 2005-1227.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85152, 2005-Ohio-2630. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. LOGSDON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1534 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 State v. Logsdon. 2005-1012.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040405, 160 Ohio App.3d 517, 2005-Ohio-1875. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., AND LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.

CAMPBELL v. TES FRANCHISING, LLC., 106 Ohio St.3d 1532 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 382 Campbell v. TES Franchising, LLC. 2005-1106.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Butler App. No. CA2004-06-151, 2005-Ohio-2271. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2005-1357, Campbell v. TES Franchising, LLC, Butler App. No. CA2004-06-151, 2005-Ohio-2271; cause held for the decision in 2004-0001, Academy of Medicine of Cincinnati […]

STATE EX REL. BRYSON v. GAC MERCHANDISING, INC., 106 Ohio St.3d 1537 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 385 State ex rel. Bryson v. GAC Merchandising, Inc. 2004-1435.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-650, 2004-Ohio-3723. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 401 2005-Ohio-3556, 830 N.E.2d 1160. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. RESNICK and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. BRAY, 106 Ohio St.3d 1534 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 383 State v. Bray. 2005-1019.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 04 MA 27, 2005-Ohio-2117. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE EX REL. MARTIN v. WOODARD, 106 Ohio St.3d 1528 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5146, 835 N.E.2d 379 State ex rel. Martin v. Woodard. 2005-1442.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 5, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On answer of respondent and motion for summary judgment. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.