2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 805 JONES v. GOODYEAR TIRE RUBBER CO. No. 2004-1169.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 14, 2005. Summit App. No. 21724, 2004-Ohio-2821. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Summit County. Upon consideration of the motion of amicus curiae Ohio […]
Articles Tagged: 2005-Ohio-540
FF, INC. v. LIQUOR CONTROL COMM., 105 Ohio St.3d 1440 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 811 FF, INC. OF CINCINNATI v. OHIO LIQUOR CONTROL COMM. No. 2004-1913.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Franklin App. Nos. 03AP-914, 03AP-915 and 03AP-916, 2004-Ohio-5259. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.
STATE v. KITTS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1441 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 811 STATE v. KITTS. No. 2004-1927.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83634, 2004-Ohio-5208. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. STAMPER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1440 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 811 STATE v. STAMPER. No. 2004-1897.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 03-MA-144, 2004-Ohio-5366. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
CUYAHOGA FALLS v. ESLINGER, 105 Ohio St.3d 1439 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 811 CUYAHOGA FALLS v. ESLINGER. No. 2004-1884.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Summit App. No. 21951, 2004-Ohio-4953. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HAGGINS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1432 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 805 DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HAGGINS. No. 2004-2034.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 14, 2005. DISCIPLINARY CASES On February 9, 2005, respondent filed a motion for extension of time to reply to an order to show cause. S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(3)(B)(1) prohibits the filing of a request for extension of time to file a response […]
KOBERSTEIN v. RICHLAND LUMBER, INC., 105 Ohio St.3d 1440 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 811 KOBERSTEIN v. RICHLAND LUMBER, INC. No. 2004-1889.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Richland App. No. 03-CA-110, 2004-Ohio-5291. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. GRIFFIN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1438 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 810 STATE v. GRIFFIN. No. 2004-1835.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-020084, 2003-Ohio-3196. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
CARRICK v. BENNETT, 105 Ohio St.3d 1439 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 811 CARRICK v. BENNETT. No. 2004-1882.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Summit App. No. 21962, 2004-Ohio-4949. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. DIXON, 105 Ohio St.3d 1438 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 810 STATE v. DIXON. No. 2004-1579.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Richland App. No. 03 CA 75, 2004-Ohio-3940. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
REINHART v. BUR. OF WORKERS’ COMP., 105 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 810 REINHART v. BUR. OF WORKERS’ COMP. No. 2004-1862.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-157. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2004-1738, Parsons v. Bur. of Workers’ Comp., Franklin App. No. 03AP-772, 2004-Ohio-4552; and briefing schedule stayed. PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, […]
STATE v. ANDREJIC, 105 Ohio St.3d 1439 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 810 STATE v. ANDREJIC. No. 2004-1868.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84093, 2004-Ohio-6571. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW