2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 Winters v. Hart. 2005-1429.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Ottawa App. No. OT-04-052, 162 Ohio App.3d 15, 2005-Ohio-3367. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents.
Articles Tagged: 2005-Ohio-5859
STATE v. NAWASH, 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 State v. Nawash. 2005-1389.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85032, 2005-Ohio-3012. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
IN RE K.K., 107 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 In re K.K. 2005-1462.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Summit App. No. 22352, 2005-Ohio-3112. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2004-2031, In re C.R., Cuyahoga App. No. 82891, 2004-Ohio-4465; and briefing schedule stayed. PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., […]
STATE v. McDONALD, 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 State v. McDonald. 2005-1396.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Ross App. No. 04CA2806, 2005-Ohio-3503. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. FARRAH, 107 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 State v. Farrah. 2005-1764.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Franklin App. No. 01AP-968, 2002-Ohio-1918. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. HERRON, 107 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 State v. Herron. 2005-1763.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 19894, 2004-Ohio-773. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. Page 1405
KEMP v. KEMP, 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 Kemp v. Kemp. 2005-1233.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Coshocton App. No. 04CA011, 161 Ohio App.3d 671, 2005-Ohio-3120. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. BEARD, 107 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 State v. Beard. 2005-1750.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 84779 and 84780, 2005-Ohio-3417. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, J., dissents.
STATE v. BANKS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Banks. 2005-1520.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85079, 2005-Ohio-3433. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
POULTON v. AM. ECONOMY INS. CO., 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 Poulton v. Am. Economy Ins. Co. 2005-1365.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Stark App. Nos. 2004CA00226 and 2004CA00228, 2005-Ohio-3123. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent. MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2005-0078 and 2005-0457 Sheaffer […]
STATE v. WILHELM, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 State v. Wilhelm. 2005-1417.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Knox App. Nos. 04 CA 000016 and 04 CA 000017, 2005-Ohio-3250. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
ADAMS v. VAN WERT CTY. HOSP., 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 Adams v. Van Wert Cty. Hosp. 2005-1420.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. VanWert App. No. 15-05-01, 2005-Ohio-3078. Discretionary appeal not accepted. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent. Motion to consolidate denied as moot.
STATE v. LETT, 107 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Lett. 2005-1421.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 84707 and 84729, 161 Ohio App.3d 274, 2005-Ohio-2665. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]
STATE v. KREMER, 107 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 State v. Kremer. 2005-0865.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Defiance App. No. 4-05-01. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1408
TAYLOR v. WOLFE, 107 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1225 Taylor v. Wolfe. 2005-1846.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Larry Taylor. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. JENKINS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Jenkins. 2005-1366.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84644, 2005-Ohio-2824. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]
STATE EX REL. TIMKEN CO. v. PENCE., 107 Ohio St.3d 1402 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1224 State ex rel. Timken Co. v. Pence. 2004-1875.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to set briefing schedule. On the authority of State ex rel. Internatl. Paper v. Trucinski, 106 Ohio St.3d 203, 2005-Ohio-4557, 833 N.E.2d 728, writ denied. Cause dismissed. Motion to […]
STATE EX REL. MARTIN v. LEISY, 107 Ohio St.3d 1403 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1225 State ex rel. Martin v. Leisy. 2005-1694.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
WAHAB JANITORIAL SERV. v. P.M. GROUP MGT., 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 Wahab Janitorial Serv. v. P.M. Group Mgt. 2005-1398.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040660, 161 Ohio App.3d 632, 2005-Ohio-3037. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. MORRIS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Morris. 2005-1345.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Highland App. No. 04CA20, 2005-Ohio-2980. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule stayed.
CHAMPLIN v. KRAFTMAID CABINETRY, INC., 107 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 Champlin v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, Inc. 2005-1672.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0052, 2005-Ohio-3772. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of lower court proceedings pending appeal. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. TARVER, 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 State v. Tarver. 2005-1404.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Stark App. No. 2005-CA-00019, 2005-Ohio-3119. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1410
STATE v. LAWHORN, 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 State v. Lawhorn. 2005-1325.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Paulding App. No. 11-04-19, 2005-Ohio-2776. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
CANTON v. KOURY, 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 Canton v. Koury. 2005-1344.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00043, 2005-Ohio-3193. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., not participating.
AVANESYAN v. KING, 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 Avanesyan v. King. 2005-1403.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Summit App. No. 22325, 2005-Ohio-2966. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. BANKS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 State v. Banks. 2005-1410.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Hamilton App. Nos. C-040437 and C-040503, 2005-Ohio-3069. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. WOODS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Woods. 2005-1528.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84993, 2005-Ohio-3425. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CAMPBELL, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 State v. Campbell. 2005-1422.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Ashtabula App. No. 2003-A-0056, 2005-Ohio-3091. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. DELLINGER, 107 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2005)
State v. Dellinger. 2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 2005-1558.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Huron App. No. H-04-016, 2005-Ohio-663. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]
STATE v. LEE, 107 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Lee. 2005-0855.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Summit App. No. 22262, 2005-Ohio-996. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2005-0773, State v. Stahl, Summit App. No. 22261, 2005-Ohio-1137; and briefing schedule stayed.
STATE v. KITTLE, 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 State v. Kittle. 2005-1360.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Athens App. No. 04CA41, 2005-Ohio-3198. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. YOUNG, 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 State v. Young. 2005-1339.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Knox App. No. 05CA14. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. McMANNIS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 State v. McMannis. 2005-1787.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Stark App. No. 2002CA00258, 2003-Ohio-1901. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. THOMAS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 State v. Thomas. 2005-1337.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85155, 2005-Ohio-2631. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF COMMRS. v. STATE, 107 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. State. 2005-1438.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84305, 162 Ohio App.3d 6, 2005-Ohio-2821. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
HORNING v. OHIO DEPT. OF JOB FAMILY SERV., 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 Horning v. Ohio Dept. of Job Family Serv. 2005-1407.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Tuscarawas App. No. 2004 AP 110069, 2005-Ohio-3249. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
SIGNER v. SIGNER, 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 Signer v. Signer. 2005-1375.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 86512. Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion for stay denied as moot. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE MOON, 107 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 In re Moon. 2005-1884.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-050280. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.
RICHARDS v. KERLAKIAN, 107 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 Richards v. Kerlakian. 2005-1905.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040825, 2005-Ohio-4414. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
S.B. CARTS, INC. v. PUT-IN-BAY, 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 S.B. Carts, Inc. v. Put-In-Bay. 2005-1387.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Ottawa App. No. OT-04-039, 161 Ohio App.3d 691, 2005-Ohio-3065. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
DIEBLE v. AUTO OWNERS INS. CO., 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 Dieble v. Auto Owners Ins. Co. 2005-1377.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00339, 2005-Ohio-2991. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
HANSON v. EBERLIN, 107 Ohio St.3d 1403 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1225 Hanson v. Eberlin. 2005-1833.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of John M. Hanson. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. Page 1404 MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
IN RE ADOPTION OF GEIS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 In re Adoption of Geis. 2005-1864.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Harrison App. No. 05 HA 574, 2005-Ohio-4378. Discretionary appeal not accepted. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Gerald Wallace by Michael R. Voorhees. Motion granted.
STATE v. STAAB, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Staab. 2005-1466.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Lorain App. No. 04CA008612, 2005-Ohio-3323. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
HAMMOND v. CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUND, 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 Hammond v. Cleveland Clinic Found. 2005-1327.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84979, 2005-Ohio-2617. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. WEST, 107 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 State v. West. 2005-1508.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Washington App. No. 04CA37, 2005-Ohio-3485. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause consolidated with 2005-1790, State v. West, Washington App. No. 04CA37, 2005-Ohio-3485; causes held for the decisions in 2004-1771 State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, […]
STATE EX REL. BOZSIK v. KIMBLER., 107 Ohio St.3d 1403 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1224 State ex rel. Bozsik v. Kimbler. 2005-1609.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
CAPEHEART v. O’BRIEN, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 Capeheart v. O’Brien. 2005-1415.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040223, 2005-Ohio-3033. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. FRAZIER, 107 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Frazier. 2005-1431.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Hancock App. No. 5-04-57, 2005-Ohio-3515. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule stayed. […]
STATE v. PUMERANO, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Pumerano. 2005-1441.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85146, 2005-Ohio-2833. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.
STATE v. BADDLEY, 107 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Baddley. 2005-1521.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Summit App. No. 22790. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. QUILES, 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 State v. Quiles. 2005-0883.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84293, 2005-Ohio-388. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. BROADNAX, 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 State v. Broadnax. 2005-1394.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040375, 2005-Ohio-3035. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
NATL. UN. FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH v. CAVINS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1403 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1225 Natl. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Cavins. 2005-1650.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On Order from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division, Certified Question of State Law, No. 203CV878C. On preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(6). The […]
STATE EX REL. STEWART v. KAINRAD, 107 Ohio St.3d 1403 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1225 State ex rel. Stewart v. Kainrad. 2005-1624.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motions to dismiss of Joseph R. Kainrad, Alan Petrov, Catherine Davis and Darlene E. White. Motions to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, […]
STATE v. ATKINS-BOOZER, 107 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Atkins-Boozer. 2005-1353.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84151, 2005-Ohio-2666. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]
STATE v. SMITH, 107 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 State v. Smith. 2005-1758.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00316, 2005-Ohio-3292. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. YOUNG, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Young. 2005-1424.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Erie App. No. E-04-013, 2005-Ohio-3369. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. McGEE, 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 State v. McGee. 2005-1385.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Lorain App. No. 04CA008600, 2005-Ohio-2815. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. GAINES, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 State [PG v. Gaines. 2005-1409.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040123. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
LAKEVIEW LOCAL SCHOOL DIST. v. TRUMBULL CTY. BD., 107 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1225 State ex rel. Lakeview Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Trumbull Cty. Bd. of Commrs. 2005-1384.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Sua sponte, alternative writ granted.
ABON, LTD. v. TRANSCONTINENTAL INS. CO., 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 Abon, Ltd. v. Transcontinental Ins. Co. 2005-1352.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Richland App. No. 2004CA0029, 2005-Ohio-3052. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
NON-EMPLOYEES OF CHATEAU EST. v. CHATEAU ESTATES, 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 Non-Employees of Chateau Estates Resident Assn. v. Chateau Estates, Ltd. 2005-1382.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Clark App. Nos. 2005-CA-02, 2005-CA-33 and 2005-CA-5, 162 Ohio App.3d 453, 2005-Ohio-3739. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE EX REL. MARTIN v. HOCKING CORR. FACILITY, 107 Ohio St.3d 1403 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1224 State ex rel. Martin v. Hocking Corr. Facility. 2005-1600.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On relator’s motion for summary judgment and respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. SMITTLE, 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 State v. Smittle. 2005-1395.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Ross App. No. 05CA2827, 2005-Ohio-3577. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. BOSTICK, 107 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Bostick. 2005-1721.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 82933, 2004-Ohio-1902 and 2005-Ohio-4003. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. MICHAEL, 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 State v. Michael. 2005-1335.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Auglaize App. No. 2-05-07. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. TOMLIN, 107 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 State v. Tomlin. 2005-1848.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-050511. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
UNION OF OPERATING ENG. v. STATE EMP. RELATIONS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1403 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1225 State ex rel. Internatl. Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18 v. State Emp. Relations Bd. 2005-1793.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Prohibition. On motion for leave to intervene of Municipal Construction Operators’ Labor Council, answer of intervening respondent Municipal Construction Equipment Operators’ Labor Council, and […]
STATE v. ALEXANDER, 107 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 State v. Alexander. 2005-1845.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Summit App. No. 22295, 2005-Ohio-2393. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. SCOTT, 107 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1225 State v. Scott. 2005-1649.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 84381, 84382, 84383, 84384 and 84389, 2005-Ohio-3690. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to withdraw as counsel and motion for appointment of new counsel. Motions granted. IT IS ORDERED by the court that Pierre H. Bergeron […]
STATE v. FREEMAN, 107 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 State v. Freeman. 2005-1749.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85137, 2005-Ohio-3480. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. JONES, 107 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Jones. 2005-1559.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Butler App. No. CA200506136, 2005-Ohio-4192. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. The court determines that the issues raised on appeal are moot. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. RESNICK, J., not participating.
STATE v. JOHNSON, 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 State v. Johnson. 2005-1312.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Allen App. No. 1-05-29. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. HARRIS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 State v. Harris. 2005-1583.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040598. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. […]
STATE v. KENNEDY, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Kennedy. 2005-1460.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85086, 161 Ohio App.3d 127, 2005-Ohio-2461. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. LLANDERAL-RAYA, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Llanderal-Raya. 2005-1475.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Medina App. No. 04CA0079-M, 2005-Ohio-3306. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
HILLIS v. HUMPHREY, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 Hillis v. Humphrey. 2005-1456.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Perry App. No. 05CA6, 2005-Ohio-3459. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
HARWOOD v. PAPPAS ASSOC., INC., 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 Harwood v. Pappas Assoc., Inc. 2005-1402.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84761, 2005-Ohio-2442. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE EX REL. N. MAIN ST. COALITION v. WEBB, 107 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State ex rel. N. Main St. Coalition v. Webb. 2005-1616.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. In Mandamus. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 437, 2005-Ohio-5009, ___ N.E.2d ___. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE v. BUEHNER, 107 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Buehner. 2005-1347.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84985, 161 Ohio App.3d 546, 2005-Ohio-2828. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. COVINGTON, 107 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 State v. Covington. 2005-1840.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040429. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, J., dissents.
STATE v. PAYNE, 107 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Payne. 2005-1579.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Franklin App. Nos. 02AP-723 and 02AP-725, 2003-Ohio-4891. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
JOHNSON v. FERGUSON-RAMOS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 Johnson v. Ferguson-Ramos. 2005-1490.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-1180, 2005-Ohio-3280. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
PATIO ENCLOSURES, INC. v. FOUR SEASONS MKTG., 107 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 Patio Enclosures, Inc. v. Four Seasons Marketing Corp. 2005-1878.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Summit App. No. 22458, 2005-Ohio-4933. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. GIPSON, 107 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 State v. Gipson. 2005-1769.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Allen App. No. 1-04-84, 2005-Ohio-3886. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, J., dissents.
STATE v. PAYNTER, 107 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Paynter. 2005-1319.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Muskingum App. No. CT2004-0015, 2005-Ohio-2911. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. III and IV; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking […]
STATE v. GRIER, 107 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 State v. Grier. 2005-0692.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Summit App. No. 22136, 2005-Ohio-716. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE EX REL. RUMPH v. EBERLIN, 107 Ohio St.3d 1403 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1225 State ex rel. Rumph v. Eberlin. 2005-1783.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Edwin L. Rump. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. WALLACE, 107 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Wallace. 2005-0978.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84808, 160 Ohio App.3d 528, 2005-Ohio-1746. Reported at 106 Ohio St.3d 1509, 2005-Ohio-4605, 833 N.E.2d 1250. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE EX REL. MARTIN v. HUNT, 107 Ohio St.3d 1402 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1224 State ex rel. Martin v. Hunt. 2005-1597.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On relator’s motion for summary judgment and respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion Page 1403 to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. HALL, 107 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Hall. 2005-1449.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 84793 and 85364, 2005-Ohio-3421. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking […]
CALLOS PROFESSIONAL EMP., LLC v. GRECO, 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1228 Callos Professional Emp., LLC v. Greco. 2005-1330.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 04-MA-95, 161 Ohio App.3d 531, 2005-Ohio-2940. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
LAYNE v. JENISON, 107 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 Layne v. Jenison. 2005-1376.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00236, 2005-Ohio-2988. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE v. KISSEBERTH, 107 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 State v. Kisseberth. 2005-1393.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20500, 2005-Ohio-3059. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. 1; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. […]
STATE EX REL. DISPATCH PRINTING CO. v. JOHNSON, 107 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1225 State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. Johnson. 2004-0394.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. In Mandamus. On motion to release exhibit. Motion granted. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
ANDERSON v. NATIONWIDE MUT. FIRE INS. CO., 107 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1227 Anderson v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 2005-1399.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-04-1251, 2005-Ohio-3043. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. 1. MOYER, C.J., O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., would accept on all Propositions of Law. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
PAVLICH v. PAVLICH, 107 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1230 Pavlich v. Pavlich. 2005-1510.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Summit App. No. 22357, 2005-Ohio-3305. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. Page 1411
STATE v. WEST, 107 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1226 State v. West. 2005-1790.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Washington App. No. 04CA37, 2005-Ohio-3485. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-1508, State v. West, Washington App. No. 04CA37, 2005-Ohio-3485, causes held for the […]
STATE v. CHURCH, 107 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5859, 836 N.E.2d 1229 State v. Church. 2005-1368.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 9, 2005. Morgan App. Nos. CA03-007 and CA04-010, 161 Ohio App.3d 589, 2005-Ohio-2984. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.