AM. CHEM. SOC. v. LEADSCOPE, INC., 107 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5961, 836 N.E.2d 1231 Am. Chem. Soc. v. Leadscope, Inc. 2005-1239.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 10, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-305, 2005-Ohio-2557. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. J. THOMAS J. GRADY, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for O’CONNOR,

Read More

STATE EX REL. TOLEDO BLADE v. BUR. OF WORKERS’, 107 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5961, 836 N.E.2d 1231 State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers’ Comp. 2005-0867.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 10, 2005. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In Mandamus. This cause came on for further consideration of the disposition of the documents that were reviewed by the receiver and that are currently in possession of […]

Read More

STATE v. HICKS, 107 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2005)

2005-Ohio-5961, 836 N.E.2d 1230 State v. Hicks. 1988-1079.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 10, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-860173. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS By entry filed October 5, 2005, this court ordered that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution on Tuesday, the 29th day of November, 2005. In order to facilitate this court’s timely consideration of […]

Read More