2006-Ohio-1050, 843 N.E.2d 796 DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ATKIN. No. 1998-0713.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 9, 2006. DISCIPLINARY CASES On January 13, 1999, this court permanently disbarred respondent, Sanford I. Atkin. On February 16, 2006, respondent filed a motion to vacate and motion to proceed in forma pauperis. On consideration thereof, It is ordered by this […]
Articles Tagged: 2006-Ohio-1050
BELLMAN v. AM. INTERNATL. GROUP, 108 Ohio St.3d 1490 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1050, 843 N.E.2d 796 BELLMAN v. AM. INTERNATL. GROUP. No. 2005-2162.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 9, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-03-1301, 163 Ohio App.3d 540, 2005-Ohio-5250. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for an […]
HOSP. ASSN. v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUS., Unpublished Decision (3-9-2006)
2006-Ohio-1050 Ohio Hospital Association v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. No. 2000-1030.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 9, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS Cuyahoga App. No. 76067. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. […]
STATE v. ARTER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1050, 843 N.E.2d 796 STATE v. ARTER. No. 2005-2303.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 9, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008817. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal […]
OHIO HOSP. ASSN. v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUS., 108 Ohio St.3d 1490 (2006)
2006-Ohio-1050, 843 N.E.2d 795 OHIO HOSP. ASSN. v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. No. 2000-1030.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 9, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 76067. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. On April 13, 2001, this court stayed further proceedings […]