2006-Ohio-1329 – LexRoll (OH)

STATE v. SMITH, 108 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 State v. Smith. No. 2005-2267.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040348, 2005-Ohio-1325. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1510

CHAMPAIGN LANDMARK, INC. v. ROBINSON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Champaign Landmark, Inc. v. Robinson. No. 2005-2319.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Champaign App. Nos. 2004-CA-29 and 2004-CA-30, 2005-Ohio-5778. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

FOSTORIA v. OHIO PATROLMEN’S BENEVOLENT ASSN., 108 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 852 Fostoria v. Ohio Patrolmen’s Benevolent Assn. No. 2004-0892.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Seneca App. No. 13-03-26, 2004-Ohio-1945. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for show cause order and contempt hearing and motion to strike appellant’s motion for show cause order and contempt hearing. Motion for show cause order granted. […]

STATE v. NESSER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1512 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 857 State v. Nesser. No. 2006-0100.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Licking App. No. 02 CA 103, 2005-Ohio-4313. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1513

STATE v. CONVERSE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 State v. Converse. No. 2005-2289.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Auglaize App. No. 2-05-20, 2005-Ohio-5752. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

STATE v. MARKIN, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Markin. No. 2006-0228.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Union App. No. 14-05-36. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. DILLON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 State v. Dillon. No. 2005-2350.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Delaware App. No. 2005CAA02012, 2005-Ohio-5938. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

GROFFRE INVESTMENTS v. NIMISHILLEN TWP., 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 State ex rel. Groffre Investments v. Nimishillen Twp. Trustees. No. 2005-2346.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005 CA 00048, 2005-Ohio-5821. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.

YAVITCH PALMER CO., L.P.A. v. U.S. FOUR, INC., 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 Yavitch Palmer Co., L.P.A. v. U.S. Four, Inc. No. 2005-2351.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-294, 2005-Ohio-5800. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

HORSFALL v. WOODARD, 108 Ohio St.3d 1512 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 Horsfall v. Woodard. No. 2005-2434.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Tuscarawas App. No. 2005AP020009, 2005-Ohio-6214. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

HARRIS v. HARRIS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 Harris v. Harris. No. 2005-2330.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87063. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

JELINEK v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 Jelinek v. Abbott Laboratories. No. 2005-2328.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 03AP-614, 2005-Ohio-5696. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents. RESNICK, J., not participating.

STATE v. MONROE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 State v. Monroe. No. 2005-2086.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-658, 2005-Ohio-5242. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE EX REL. TATUM v. WINKLER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 852 State ex rel. Tatum v. Winkler. No. 2006-0136.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

PROVIDENT BANK v. ADRIATIC, INC., 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 Provident Bank v. Adriatic, Inc. No. 2005-2343.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Clermont App. No. CA2004-12-108, 2005-Ohio-5774. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

AM. LOGISTICS GROUP, INC. v. WEINPERT, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Am. Logistics Group, Inc. v. Weinpert. No. 2005-2315.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85041, 2005-Ohio-4809. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. COLSTON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Colston. No. 2006-0272.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Clermont App. No. CA2004-11-099, 2005-Ohio-7031. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2005-1347, State v. Buehner, Cuyahoga App. No. 84985, 161 […]

NATL. LIME STONE CO. v. BLANCHARD TWP., 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 Natl. Lime Stone Co. v. Blanchard Twp. No. 2005-2349.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Hardin App. No. 6-04-04, 2005-Ohio-5758. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. ALEXANDER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Alexander. No. 2006-0258.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85688, 2005-Ohio-5200. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

HUNTINGTON NATL. BANK v. D’EGIDIO, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Huntington Natl. Bank v. D’Egidio. No. 2005-2276.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008647, 2005-Ohio-5497. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. MYERS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 State v. Myers. No. 2005-2360.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Perry App. No. 01-CA-5, 2002-Ohio-253. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

IN RE J.J., 108 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 In re J.J. No. 2006-0064.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86276, 2005-Ohio-6096. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.

STATE EX REL. INSUL CO. v. HANNA, 108 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 852 State ex rel. lnsul Co., Inc. v. Hanna. No. 2006-0155.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. In Mandamus and Prohibition. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion of respondent to dismiss and motion of asbestos claimants represented by Kelley Ferraro, LLP for leave to intervene as respondents. Motion for leave to intervene […]

MID-AM. FIRE CAS. CO. v. HEASLEY, 108 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Mid-Am. Fire Cas. Co. v. Heasley. No. 2005-2399.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Lake App. No. 2004-L-115, 2005-Ohio-6072. Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2006-0249, Mid-Am. Fire Cas. Co. v. Heasley, Lake App. No. 2004-L-115, 2005-Ohio-6072. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

BAGNOLA v. BAGNOLA, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Bagnola v. Bagnola. No. 2005-2290.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005CA00059, 2005-Ohio-5708. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

STATE v. SHELLS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 State v. Shells. No. 2005-2321.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 20802, 2005-Ohio-5787. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. V and reverse the Page 1511 judgment of the court of appeals on the authority of State v. […]

STATE EX REL. SOUTH v. PERKINS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 852 State ex rel. South v. Perkins. No. 2006-0264.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNFLL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

STATE v. HAND, 108 Ohio St.3d 1513 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 857 State v. Hand No. 2003-1325.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Delaware C.P. No. 02CRI-08-366. Reported at 107 Ohio St.3d 378, 2006-Ohio-18, 840 N.E.2d 151. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. Arlene Singer, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for O’CONNOR, J.

STEMPLE v. DUNINA, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Stemple v. Dunina. No. 2005-2282.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Miami App. No. 04CA40, 2005-Ohio-5590. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. HANCOCK, 108 Ohio St.3d 1513 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329 STATE v. HANCOCK. No. 2003-2099.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Warren C.P. No. 00CR19073. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 57, 2006-Ohio-160, 840 N.E.2d 1032. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

STATE v. BRADFORD, 108 Ohio St.3d 1512 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 State v. Bradford. No. 2005-2377.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Summit App. No. 22441, 2005-Ohio-5804. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. POOLE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Poole. No. 2006-0243.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85277. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

STATE v. KINCER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 State v. Kincer. No. 2005-2255.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Clermont App. No. CA2004-06-048, 2005-Ohio-5626. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

ARNOLD CARUSO, LTD. v. NYKTAS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Arnold Caruso, Ltd. v. Nyktas. No. 2005-2273.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-05-1011, 2005-Ohio-5566. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., not participating.

BROWN v. OHIO DEPT. OF JOB FAMILY SERVS., 108 Ohio St.3d 1512 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 Brown v. Ohio Dept. of Job Family Servs. No. 08-7973892005-2372.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Defiance App. No. 4-05-07, 164 Ohio App.3d 311, 2005-Ohio-5887. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. ADAMS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 State v. Adams. No. 2006-0332.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0053, 2005-Ohio-4332. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

STATE v. THOMPSON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 State v. Thompson. No. 2006-0346.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Jefferson App. No. 05 JE 16, 2005-Ohio-6792. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

DIERDORF v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTH., 108 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 852 State ex rel. Dierdorf v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. No. 2006-0055.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRAFTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

STATE EX REL. HARDS v. KLAMMER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State ex rel. Hards v. Klammer. No. 2005-1223.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Lake App. No. 2004-L-189, 2005-Ohio-2655. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to reinstate stay of probate proceedings and motion to expedite consideration of that motion. Motions denied.

STATE v. LOGGINS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 State v. Loggins. No. 2005-2286.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050078. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. CAMPBELL, 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 State v. Campbell. No. 2005-2325.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050852. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. BREININGER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Breininger. No. 2006-0262.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Defiance App. No. 4-05-14, 2005-Ohio-4748. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

STATE v. HANCOCK, 108 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Hancock. No. 2006-0178.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 19434, 2003-Ohio-2080 and 2005-Ohio-127. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. Page 1507

STATE EX REL. LOYD v. LOVELADY, 108 Ohio St.3d 1513 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 857 State ex rel. Loyd v. Lovelady. No. 2004-1465.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 83090, 2004-Ohio-3617. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 86, 2006-Ohio-161, 840 N.E.2d 1062. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

SUMMIT CTY. FISCAL v. ELIZABETH WILLIAMS HOME, 108 Ohio St.3d 1513 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 857 Summit Cty. Fiscal Officer v. Elizabeth Williams Group Home, Inc. No. 2005-1761.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Summit App. No. 22126. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1414, 2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 319. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

HUTCHINS v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYS., 108 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 Hutchins v. FedEx Ground Package Sys. No. 2006-0403.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Summit App. No. 22838, 2005-Ohio-6985. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

STATE v. GORDON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 State v. Gordon. No. 2005-1879.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005CA00031, 2005-Ohio-3638. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. CLINE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 State v. Cline. No. 2005-2307.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Champaign App. No. 2002-CA-5, 164 Ohio App.3d 228, 2005-Ohio-5779. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. GREENWOOD, 108 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 State v. Greenwood. No. 2006-0314.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 19820, 2004-Ohio-2737. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

DEVER v. CASBEER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 Dever v. Casbeer. No. 2005-2362.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050106, 2005-Ohio-5860. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.

IN RE T.W., 108 Ohio St.3d 1513 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 857 In re T.W. No. 2005-2279.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85845, 2005-Ohio-5446. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1418, 2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 321. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and RESNICK, J., dissent. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would grant the motion […]

STATE v. HULITTLE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 State v. Hulittle. No. 2006-0284.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87315. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.

STATE EX REL. SHEPPARD v. CLEVELAND, 108 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 852 State ex rel. Sheppard v. Cleveland No. 2006-0278.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Motion for leave of amicus curiae Ohio Municipal League to file a memorandum urging dismissal on behalf of respondents dismissed as moot. Cause […]

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. QUATMAN, Unpublished Decision (3-29-2006)

2006-Ohio-1329 Disciplinary Counsel v. Quatman. No. 2005-1531.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISION WITH OPINION On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 04-040. George Bernard Quatman, Attorney Registration No. 0008117, is suspended from the practice […]

MID-AM. FIRE CAS. CO. v. HEASLEY, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 Mid-Am. Fire Cas. Co. v. Heasley. No. 2006-0249.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Lake App. No. 2004-L-115, 2005-Ohio-6072. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issues stated at page 5 of the court […]

GRADY v. CHARLES KALINSKY, D.D.S., INC., 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 Grady v. Charles Kalinsky, D.D.S., Inc. No. 2005-2337.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86240, 2005-Ohio-5550. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

SHROPSHIRE v. PROGRESSIVE INS. CO., 108 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Shropshire v. Progressive Ins. Co. No. 2005-1906.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 20550, 2005-Ohio-4533. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

FRISCH’S RESTAURANT, INC. v. MABE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Frisch’s Restaurant, Inc. v. Mabe. No. 2005-2257.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-412, 2005-Ohio-5426. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.

STATE v. TAYLOR, 108 Ohio St.3d 1512 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 857 State v. Taylor. No. 2006-0006.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Athens App. No. 04CA32, 2005-Ohio-3721. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. MANNING, 108 Ohio St.3d 1512 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 857 State v. Manning. No. 2006-0012.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87244. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. PAHOUNDIS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Pahoundis. No. 2006-0198.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Coshocton App. No. 05-CA-009, 2005-Ohio-6111. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.

BOYD v. HARIANI, 108 Ohio St.3d 1513 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 857 Boyd v. Hariani. No. 2005-1940.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Summit App. No. 22500, 2005-Ohio-4536. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1417, 2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 320. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

SUTTON v. SNYDER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Sutton v. Snyder. No. 2005-2298.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0064, 2005-Ohio-5603. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

STATE v. ADAMS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1512 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 State v. Adams. No. 2005-2415.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Warren App. No. CA2005-06-075. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

GROOB v. KeyBANK, Unpublished Decision (3-29-2006)

2006-Ohio-1329 Groob v. KeyBank. No. 2004-0214.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISION WITH OPINION Hamilton App. No. C-020191, 155 Ohio App.3d 510, 2003-Ohio-6915. Judgment reversed. Moyer, C.J., O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Farmer, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ, dissent. Sheila […]

STATE v. SCHILLING, 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 State v. Schilling. No. 2005-2331.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Tuscarawas App. No. 2005AP-04-0029. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motions to obtain records, to set aside sentence, for post-conviction relief, and for expert assistance denied as moot.

WOOTEN v. CSX RY., 108 Ohio St.3d 1512 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 Wooten v. CSX Ry. No. 2005-2414.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Miami App. No. 2005 CA 4, 164 Ohio App.3d 428, 2005-Ohio-6252. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

FERRELL v. SUMMA HEALTH SYS., 108 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Ferrell v. Summa Health Sys. No. 2005-2401.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Summit App. No. 22527, 2005-Ohio-5944. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2005-0998, Robinson v. Bates, Hamilton App. No. C-040063, 160 Ohio App.3d 668, 2005-Ohio-1879; and briefing schedule stayed. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and […]

STATE v. STERLING, 108 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 State v. Sterling. No. 2005-2388.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Ashtabula App. No. 2003-A-0135, 2005-Ohio-6081. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.

STATE v. FOUST, 108 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 State v. Foust. No. 2005-2260.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 83771, 2005-Ohio-5331. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. OPALACH, 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 State v. Opalach. No. 2005-2345.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85540, 2005-Ohio-5563. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. ESTILL, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 State v. Estill. No. 2005-2312.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040645. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. V and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals on the authority of State v. Foster, ___ Ohio […]

CLEVELAND MOBILE RADIO SALES v. VERIZON WIRELESS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 Cleveland Mobile Radio Sales, Inc. v. Verizon Wireless. No. 2005-2299.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85620, 2005-Ohio-5439. Discretionary appeal accepted. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-2302 Discount Cellular, Inc. v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc., Cuyahoga App. No. 85618, 2005-Ohio-5437. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents. RESNICK, […]

STATE v. BANKS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1513 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 857 State v. Banks. No. 2005-2155.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Ashtabula App. No. 2003-A-0118, 2005-Ohio-5286. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1440, 2006-Ohio-421, 842 N.E.2d 65. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. RESNICK, J., dissents.

HARRIS v. McPHERSON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329 Harris v. McPherson. No. 2005-2365.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008698. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1512

STATE v. YOUNG, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 853 State v. Young. No. 2006-0242.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-797, 2005-Ohio-5489. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. COSTILLA, 108 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 State v. Costilla. No. 2006-0354.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Greene App. No. 2005-CA-24, 2005-Ohio-6534. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. WRIGHT, 108 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 State v. Wright. No. 2006-0350.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Allen App. No. 1-05-48. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

STATE v. McDANIEL, 108 Ohio St.3d 1512 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 State v. McDaniel. No. 2005-2376.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008690, 2005-Ohio-5809. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

GALLAGHER v. McKEEVER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Gallagher v. McKeever. No. 2005-2305.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Franklin App. Nos. 04AP-1273, 04AP-1274 and 04AP-1283, 2005-Ohio-5645. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. SANDERS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 State v. Sanders. No. 2006-0345.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Portage App. No. 2004-P-0094, 2005-Ohio-4778. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., dissents.

STATE v. JORDAN, 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 State v. Jordan. No. 2005-2354.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Muskingum App. No. CT2003-0029, 2005-Ohio-6064. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE EX REL. FULLER v. WILLIAMS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 852 State ex rel. Fuller v. Williams. No. 2006-0232.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On petition for writ of habeas corpus of William D. Fuller. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. Page 1506

SHAY v. SHAY, 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 Shay v. Shay. No. 2005-2363.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Fulton App. No. F-05-008, 2005-Ohio-5874. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.

STATE v. JOHNSON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1513 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 857 State v. Johnson. No. 2005-1751.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85416, 2005-Ohio-3724. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1414, 2006-Ohio-179, 841 N.E.2d 318. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

EARHART PETROLEUM, INC. v. TIEFENTHALER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1509 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 Earhart Petroleum, Inc. v. Tiefenthaler. No. 2005-2259.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Miami App. No. 05CA21. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

LORINCE v. UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INS. CO., 108 (3-29-2006)

2006-Ohio-1329 Lorince v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. No. 2005-0103.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISION WITH OPINION Cuyahoga App. No. 83711, 2004-Ohio-6287. Sua sponte, cause dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., […]

STATE v. WILLIAMS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1512 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 857 State v. Williams. No. 2005-2441.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85893, 2005-Ohio-6020. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

DZINA v. CELEBREZZE, Unpublished Decision (3-29-2006)

2006-Ohio-1329 Dzina v. Celebrezze. No. 2005-1459.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISION WITH OPINION Cuyahoga App. No. 86043, 2005-Ohio-3127. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

STATE v. MOZENA, 108 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 State v. Mozena. No. 2006-0399.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050208, 2006-Ohio-717. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and RESNICK, J., dissent.

STATE v. CLEVENGER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 State v. Clevenger. No. 2006-0324.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0130, 2006-Ohio-128. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. O’CONNOR, J., not participating.

IN RE C.R., Unpublished Decision (3-29-2006)

2006-Ohio-1329 In re C.R. No. 2004-2031.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISION WITH OPINION Cuyahoga App. No. 82891, 2004-Ohio-4465. Certified question answered. Moyer, C.J., O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Resnick, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

EULRICH v. WEAVER BROTHERS, INC., 108 Ohio St.3d 1512 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 Eulrich v. Weaver Brothers, Inc. No. 2005-2405.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Logan App. No. 8-04-35, 2005-Ohio-5891. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

DAYTON v. HUBER, 108 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 854 Dayton v. Huber. No. 2006-0300.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 20425, 2004-Ohio-7249. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. Page 1508

STATE v. MOREFIELD, 108 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855 State v. Morefield. No. 2005-2317.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-938. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. RICE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1511 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856 State v. Rice. No. 2005-2329.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050816. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

TARR v. WILLIAMS, 108 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2006)

2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 852 Tarr v. Williams. No. 2006-0202.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 29, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Kevin W. Tarr. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. LANZINGER, J., not participating.