Articles Tagged: 2006-Ohio-2998

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 In re Mowen. No. 2006-0549.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Clermont App. No. CA2005-05-040, 2006-Ohio-344. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Mayes. No. 2006-0197.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86203, 2006-Ohio-105. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1426, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 535. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Chase Mtge. Serv., Inc. v. Latsa. No. 2006-0053.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85682, 2005-Ohio-6021. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1423, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 533. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration, amended motion for reconsideration, and motion to clarify. Motions denied.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Coran. No. 2005-1323.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Clark App. No. 2003-CA-80, 2004-Ohio-6874. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 313, 2006-Ohio-2109, 847 N.E.2d 1174. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1030 Olynyk v. Andrish. No. 2006-0310.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1427, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 535. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted and the cause is […]

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Brickner-Latham. No. 2006-0605.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Seneca App. No. 13-05-26, 2006-Ohio-609. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Lohmeyer. No. 2006-0728.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-05-1059. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1026 Elsass v. Jeffreys. No. 2006-0937.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Joshua Elsass. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1026 Taogaga v. Jeffreys. No. 2006-0938.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Max Taogaga. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 State v. Burke. No. 2006-0321.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-1234, 2005-Ohio-7020 and 2006-Ohio-1026. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal and discretionary cross-appeal not accepted. O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the cross-appeal.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Licul v. Swagelok Co. No. 2006-0611.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86322, 2006-Ohio-711. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Brown. No. 2005-1874.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-04-1148, 2005-Ohio-4348. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 313, 2006-Ohio-2109, 847 N.E.2d 1174. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Driver. No. 2006-0558.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 03 MA 210, 2006-Ohio-494. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Smith. No. 2006-0598.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Marion App. No. 9-05-22, 2006-Ohio-735. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. No. 2004-1993.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 03-2144-EL-AAM, 03-2144-EL-ATA and 03-2144-EL-UNC. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 328, 2006-Ohio-2110, 847 N.E.2d 1184. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration of First Energy Corporation. Motion denied. O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., […]

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 State v. Crawford. No. 2006-0850.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050161. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 Summit Cty. Children Servs. Bd. v. Communication Workers of Am., Local No. 4546. No. 2006-0567.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Summit App. No. 22697, 2006-Ohio-389. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent. Page 1506

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 State v. Moore. No. 2006-0502.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85828, 2006-Ohio-277. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III; cause held for the decision in 2006-0294 and 2006-0298, State v. Crager, Marion App. No. 9-04-54, 2005-Ohio-6868; and briefing schedule […]

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. No. 2005-0766.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Public Utilities Commission, No. 03-2144-EL-ATA. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 328, 2006-Ohio-2110, 847 N.E.2d 1184. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration of First Energy Corporation. Motion denied. O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. On motion […]

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Stine v. Ry. Transfer Storage. No. 2006-0552.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005 CA 00117, 2006-Ohio-398. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 State v. Carr. No. 2006-0890.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Clermont App. No. CA2004-01-006, 2005-Ohio-417. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Travis. No. 2006-0680.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86328, 2006-Ohio-802. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 State v. Edwards. No. 2006-0925.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040281. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Le. No. 2006-0719.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87687. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 Webb v. McCarty. No. 2006-0616.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-698, 2006-Ohio-795. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. RESNICK, PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Omans v. Norfolk S. Ry. No. 2006-0518.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-05-1047, 165 Ohio App.3d 146, 2006-Ohio-325. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. LANZINGER, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Maumee v. Pub. Util. Comm. No. 2005-0118.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Public Utilities Commission, No. 03-2144-EL-ATA. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 328, 2006-Ohio-2110, 847 N.E.2d 1184. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration of First Energy Corporation. Motion denied. O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 State v. Beeler. No. 2006-0880.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Summit App. No. 22884. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1026 State ex rel. Barton v. Collins. No. 2006-0726.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Mapes. No. 2006-0551.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86225, 2006-Ohio-294. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. On motion for order Page 1507 removing David A. Mapes from death row. Motion granted. Se State v. Penix (1987), 32 Ohio St.3d 369, 513 N.E.2d […]

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Heaton v. Carter. No. 2006-0606.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Licking App. No. 05-CA-76, 2006-Ohio-633. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Ossman. No. 2006-0523.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Licking App. No. 03 CA 92, 2006-Ohio-720. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 State v. Powell. No. 2006-0869.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Clermont App. No. CA2005-11-102. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Trader v. Cleveland No. 2006-0595.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86227, 2006-Ohio-295. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Murphy v. Murphy. No. 2006-0597.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005-CA-00101, 2006-Ohio-557. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Dray v. Gen. Motors Corp. No. 2006-0547.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Allen App. No. 1-05-35, 2006-Ohio-347. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1026 State ex rel. Grundstein v. Greene. No. 2006-0795.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., would grant an alternative writ.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Scruggs. No. 2006-0608.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040614. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Shugars. No. 2006-0668.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050380, 165 Ohio App.3d 379, 2006-Ohio-718. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 Neinast v. Bd. of Trustees of Columbus Metro. Library. No. 2006-0508.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-668, 165 Ohio App.3d 211, 2006-Ohio-287. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Graham. No. 2006-0556.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Hancock App. No. 5-05-13, 2006-Ohio-352. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 E.B. v. T.J. No. 2006-0582.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86399, 2006-Ohio-441. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Thomas. No. 2006-0659.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85968, 2006-Ohio-280. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 In re Walker. No. 2006-0676.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Ashtabula App. No. 2005-A-0067, 2006-Ohio-739. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Architectural Interior Prod., Inc. v. Miarer Transp., Inc. No. 2006-0653.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Muskingum App. No. CT2005-0052, 2006-Ohio-824. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion for order to show cause denied. LANZINGER, J., would grant the motion for order to show cause.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Washington. No. 2006-0510.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-060005. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 State ex rel. Richard v. Anderson. No. 2006-0862.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Lorain App. No. 06CA008887. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for emergency relief and immediate consideration and second motion for emergency relief and immediate consideration. Motions denied.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 Rowe v. Brunsman. No. 2006-0978.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Ross App. No. 06CA2891, 2006-Ohio-1964. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1026 Morrow Cty. Airport Auth. v. Whetstone Flyers, Ltd. No. 2005-1802.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Morrow App. No. 04 CA 6, 162 Ohio App.3d 624, 2005-Ohio-4314. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to participate in oral argument. Motion denied. On motion for relief from S.Ct.Prac.R. VI(7). Motion granted.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1026 Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Eng. Group, Inc. No. 2005-2134.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Summit App. Nos. 22475, 22476, 22477, 22478, 22485, 22486, 22487, 22488, 22489, 22497, 22499, 22506 and 22513, 163 Ohio App.3d 522, 2005-Ohio-5113. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for admission pro hac vice of Jill […]

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 In re Stevenson. No. 2006-0638.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Mercer App. No. 10-05-17, 2006-Ohio-607. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. Motion to dismiss denied as moot.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1030 State v. Crosby. No. 2006-0309.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-03-1158, 2004-Ohio-4674. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1426, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 535. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Bradley. No. 2006-0147.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Champaign App. No. 2004-CA-15, 2005-Ohio-6533. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1425, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 534. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. RESNICK and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Jordan. No. 2006-0584.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85817, 2006-Ohio-538. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Arnold Caruso v. Nyktas. No. 2006-0135.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-05-1011, 2005-Ohio-5566. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1425, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 534. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. RESNICK, J., not participating.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Olynyk v. Andrish. No. 2006-0235.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 1420, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 531. On motion for reconsideration. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent: The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties […]

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 Kahn v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. No. 2006-0408.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040669, 165 Ohio App.3d 420, 2006-Ohio-112. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal and discretionary cross-appeal not accepted. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Total Exposure. Com, Ltd. v. Miami Valley Broadcasting Corp. No. 2006-0561.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 21062, 2006-Ohio-484. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1026 State v. Curran. No. 2006-0847.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Clark App. No. 2005 CA 22, 2006-Ohio-773. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Davis v. Akron. No. 2006-0625.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Summit App. No. 22985. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Bungard v. Ohio Dept. of Job Family Servs. No. 2006-0575.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-43, 2006-Ohio-429. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Quinones. No. 2006-0733.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87704. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 In re Whaley. No. 2006-0537.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2005-T-0137, 2006-Ohio-491. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Litman v. McLaughlin. No. 2006-0563.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Ashland App. No. 05-COA-016, 2006-Ohio-433. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Ricica. No. 2006-0524.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Fulton App. No. F-05-009, 2006-Ohio-327. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Stinnett v. Halcore Group, Inc. No. 2006-0607.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-239, 165 Ohio App.3d 464, 2006-Ohio-504. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1508

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 RLB Eng. v. McGaw. No. 2006-0590.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Summit App. No. 22579, 2006-Ohio-655. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 Galehouse v. Geiser. No. 2006-0669.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Wayne App. No. 05CA0037, 2006-Ohio-766. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Nieland No. 2006-0592.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Greene App. No. 2005-CA-15, 2006-Ohio-784. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Ellison. No. 2006-0578.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050553, 2006-Ohio-2620. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 State v. Legg. No. 2006-0876.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050994. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 State v. Parks. No. 2006-0866.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 20905, 2005-Ohio-6395. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 State v. Dovala. No. 2006-0972.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008767. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of judgment. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Ensehusih. No. 2006-0679.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Wayne App. No. 05CA0042, 2006-Ohio-651. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Ely. No. 2006-0610.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86091, 2006-Ohio-459. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 CitiFinancial, Inc. v. Lynch. No. 2006-0588.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Lorain App. No. 06CA008862. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Brooklyn v. Fouche. No. 2006-0548.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85510, 2006-Ohio-169. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1026 State v. Jarrett. No. 2006-0842.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Auglaize App. No. 2-05-37, 2006-Ohio-882. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2006-0294 and 2006-0298, State v. Crager, Marion App. No. […]

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1026 State ex rel. Anderson v. Common Pleas Court of Lake County. No. 2006-0761.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Fleming. No. 2006-0736.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85328, 2006-Ohio-706. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and LANZINGER, J., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. Page 1509

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1029 State v. Graham. No. 2006-0725.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-588, 2006-Ohio-914. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Cafaro v. Fatteh. No. 2006-0609.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 05 MA 162. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Mitchell. No. 2006-0630.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0139, 2006-Ohio-618. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., not participating.

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1026 State ex rel. Morgan v. New Lexington. No. 2006-0714.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Alternative writ is granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X: The parties shall […]

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1027 State v. Scott. No. 2006-0494.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005CA00028, 2006-Ohio-257. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 Chumney v. Scott. No. 2006-0544.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Tuscarawas App. No. 2005 AP 06 0036, 2006-Ohio-439. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW