Articles Tagged: 2006-Ohio-421

842 N.E.2d 61, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Hammond. No. 2005-2361.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Stark App. No. 2004CA00026, 2005-Ohio-225. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ. dissent.

842 N.E.2d 62, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Hogan. No. 2005-2011.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Mahoning App. Nos. 03-MA-224 and 04-MA-3, 2005-Ohio-4889. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and […]

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Gau. No. 2005-2038.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Lake App. No. 2004-L-020, 2005-Ohio-4906. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 62, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Wilkins. No. 2005-2158.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Summit App. No. 22421, 163 Ohio App.3d 576, 2005-Ohio-5193. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2005-2336, State v. Buehler, Cuyahoga App. No. 85796, 2005-Ohio-5717; and briefing schedule stayed.

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 Stedman v. Hans. No. 2005-2042.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-377, 2005-Ohio-4819. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Holmes. No. 2005-1985.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2005-08-209. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent and would accept the discretionary appeal and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State […]

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 In re All Kelley Ferraro Asbestos Cases v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. No. 2005-2014.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86761. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II, III, and IV. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. O’CONNOR, […]

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 Stand Energy Corp. v. Ruyan. No. 2005-1962.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050004, 2005-Ohio-4846. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Parker. No. 2005-2000.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 03 MA 190, 2005-Ohio-4888. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 Arnold v. Insul Co., Inc. No. 2005-2013.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86763. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent. O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Stillman. No. 2005-1954.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Delaware App. No. 05CAA04024, 2005-Ohio-5380. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 University Commons Assoc. Ltd. v. Commercial One Asset Mgt., Inc. No. 2005-2002.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85202, 2005-Ohio-4568. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., not participating.

842 N.E.2d 62, 2006-Ohio-421 In re Adoption of Pushcar. No. 2005-2118.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Lake App. No. 2005-L-050, 2005-Ohio-5114. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Roper. No. 2005-2027.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Summit App. No. 22494, 2005-Ohio-4796. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Gibson. No. 2005-2017.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Washington App. No. 05CA20, 2005-Ohio-5353. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Everitt. No. 2005-2183.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Warren App. Nos. CA2005-04-052 and CA2005-04-053. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Ridenour. No. 2005-2168.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 20538, 2005-Ohio-5238. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 61, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Brooke. No. 2006-0015.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Lake App. No. 2004-L-088, 2005-Ohio-6161. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Banks. No. 2005-2155.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Ashtabula App. No. 2003-A-0118, 2005-Ohio-5286 APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. IV and hold the cause for the decision in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. […]

842 N.E.2d 62, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Harris. No. 2005-1970.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Marion App. No. 9-04-11, 2005-Ohio-4618. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. […]

842 N.E.2d 61, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Palmer. No. 2006-0022.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Portage App. No. 2004-P-0106, 2005-Ohio-6710. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. PFEIFER and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Allen. No. 2005-2018.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040838, 2005-Ohio-4856. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents. O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. RESNICK, J., not participating.

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 Lanfranc v. Lanfranc. No. 2005-1960.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Licking App. No. 05CA11, 2005-Ohio-4715. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Adams. No. 2005-2057.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Warren App. No. CA2005-08-098. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 60, 2006-Ohio-421 Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm. No. 2005-0767.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Public Utilities Commission, No. 04-169-EL-UNC. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion of Ohio Energy Group for leave to intervene as appellee. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents. On motion of Columbus Southern Power Company and Ohio Power […]

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 Wochna v. Kimbler. No. 2005-2019.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Medina App. No. 05CA0020-M, 163 Ohio App.3d 349, 2005-Ohio-4802. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Wagner. No. 2005-2040.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Fairfield App. No. 05-CA-45, 2005-Ohio-5209. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Ramos. No. 2005-2048.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86907. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Appellant’s motions for leave to waive more stringent standards than formal pleadings and to amend notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction denied as moot.

842 N.E.2d 61, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Perry. No. 2005-1952.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0113, 2005-Ohio-4653. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule […]

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Dissell. No. 2005-1973.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85072, 2005-Ohio-4395. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. V and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. […]

842 N.E.2d 60, 2006-Ohio-421 Fehrenbach v. O’Malley. No. 2005-2301.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040128, 2005-Ohio-5554. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Entry filed December 1, […]

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. McCain. No. 2005-2026.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Pickaway App. No. 04CA27, 2005-Ohio-4952. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 62, 2006-Ohio-421 Fehrenbach v. O’Malley. No. 2005-2283.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040128, 2005-Ohio-5554. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III and cause consolidated with 2005-2301, Fehrenbach v. O’Malley, Hamilton App. No. C-040128, No. 2005-Ohio-5554. Page 1437 LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., would also accept […]

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 Tobias, Kraus Torchia v. Schlagel. No. 2005-1176.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040644. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 107 Ohio St.3d 1682, 2005-Ohio-6480, 839 N.E.2d 402. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Adams. No. 2005-2096.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Licking App. No. 2005-CA-0024, 2005-Ohio-5211. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Scott. No. 2005-1649.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 84381, 84382, 84383, 84384 and 84389, 2005-Ohio-3690. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. […]

842 N.E.2d 62, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Gonzales. No. 2005-1983.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Defiance App. No. 4-05-03, 2005-Ohio-4912. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause consolidated with No. 2005-2421, State v. Gonzales, Defiance App. No. 4-05-03, 2005-Ohio-4912; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, […]

842 N.E.2d 61, 2006-Ohio-421 Weinfeld v. Welling. No. 2005-1964.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Stark App. No. 2004CA00340, 2005-Ohio-4721. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., would also accept on all other Propositions of Law. LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Williams. No. 2005-1972.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85858, 2005-Ohio-4422. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Page 1438 Law No. II and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771 State v. […]

842 N.E.2d 61, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Clagg. No. 2005-1959.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Washington App. No. 04CA30, 2005-Ohio-4992. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule […]

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Foster. No. 2005-2140.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Portage App. No. 2004-P-0104, 2005-Ohio-5281. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Norman. No. 2005-2009.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-1312, 2005-Ohio-5087. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Atkinson. No. 2005-1956.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85773, 2005-Ohio-5348. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 Gochenour v. Norcia. No. 2005-2088.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Erie App. No. E-05-021, 2005-Ohio-5026. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Leach. No. 2005-1260.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 84794, 2005-Ohio-1870. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 107 Ohio St.3d 1682, 2005-Ohio-6480, 839 N.E.2d 403. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Lent. No. 2005-1958.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Washington App. No. 04CA38, 2005-Ohio-4757. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Novel. No. 2005-1995.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Richland App. No. 05CA69. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. McGrath. No. 2005-1974.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85046, 2005-Ohio-4420. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

842 N.E.2d 61, 2006-Ohio-421 LeRoy v. Allen Yurasek Merklin. No. 2005-1926.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Union App. No. 14-04-49, 162 Ohio App3d. 155, 2005-Ohio-4452. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. Motion to consolidated this cause with 2005-1593, LeRoy v. Allen Yurasek Merklin, Union App. No. 14-04-49, 162 Ohio App.3d 155, 2005-Ohio-4452, is […]

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 Nationsbanc Mtge. Corp. v. Davet. No. 2005-1980.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86862. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Morales. No. 2005-1981.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Licking App. No. 2004 CA 68, 2005-Ohio-4714. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. III.

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 Reith v. McGill Smith Punshon, Inc. No. 2005-2016.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040760, 2005-Ohio-4852. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 60, 2006-Ohio-421 State ex rel. Donley v. Kessler. No. 2005-1865.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. In Prohibition. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. Page 1434

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Osborne. No. 2005-2035.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Lake App. No. 2004-L-068, 2005-Ohio-4895. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Patterson. No. 2005-1934.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 04 MA 210, 2005-Ohio-4689. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 61, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Gonzales. No. 2005-2421.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Defiance App. No. 4-05-03, 2005-Ohio-4912. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2005-1983, State v. Gonzales, Defiance App. No. 4-05-03, 2005-Ohio-4912; cause held for […]

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 Cleveland v. Whitmore. No. 2005-1977.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 84405, 2005-Ohio-4393. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 61, 2006-Ohio-421 Gehm v. Timberline Post Frame. No. 2005-2384.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Summit App. No. 22479, 2005-Ohio-5222. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry […]

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 In re Jones-Dentigance. No. 2005-2425.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Portage App. No. 2005-P-0058, 2005-Ohio-5960. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Tiedjen. No. 2005-2103.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85674, 2005-Ohio-4989. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III.

842 N.E.2d 62, 2006-Ohio-421 Gehm v. Timberline Post Frame. No. 2005-2137.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Summit App. No. 22479, 2005-Ohio-5222. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I and cause consolidated with Gehm v. Timberline Post Frame, Summit App. No. 22479, 2005-Ohio-5222. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., […]

842 N.E.2d 61, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Williams. No. 2005-2409.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-279, 2004-Ohio-6254. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 Akron v. Williams. No. 2004-0695.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Summit App. No. 21306, 2003-Ohio-7197. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 107 Ohio St.3d 203, 2005-Ohio-6268, 837 N.E.2d 1169. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

842 N.E.2d 60, 2006-Ohio-421 First Baptist Church of Milford v. Wilkins. No. 2005-1683.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2004-M-143. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On request for oral argument. Request granted.

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 In re Adoption of Hoffbauer. No. 2005-2416.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040859. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 62, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Calhoun. No. 2005-1604.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. Nos. C-030821 and C-030869. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. II and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771, […]

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Carrico. No. 2005-2167.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005CA00228. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 State ex rel. Segedy v. Arts Residential Roofing. No. 2004-2081.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Franklin App. No. 03AP-1235, 2004-Ohio-5945. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 107 Ohio St.3d 256, 2005-Ohio-6429, 838 N.E.2d 653. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 Bohanan v. Farmers Ins. of Columbus, Inc. No. 2005-2111.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Delaware App. No. 05-CAE-02010, 2005-Ohio-5399. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., not participating.

842 N.E.2d 62, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Keller. No. 2005-2071.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Summit App. No. 22514, 2005-Ohio-5108. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. […]

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 AVB Properties, LLC v. Chesler. No. 2005-1941.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008702. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Kee. No. 2005-1988.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Delaware App. No. 04 CAC 09 064, 2005-Ohio-4707. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. DeMastry. No. 2005-2037.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Fairfield App. No. 05CA14, 2005-Ohio-4962. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 Coles v. Daniels. No. 2005-1953.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85573, 2005-Ohio-4701. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. II.

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Smith. No. 2005-1935.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040512. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 Cottrill v. Wayne Mut. Ins. Co. No. 2005-1991.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Wayne App. No. 05CA0018, 2005-Ohio-4937. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

842 N.E.2d 60, 2006-Ohio-421 State ex rel. Perotti v. Court of Appeals, Seventh Appellate Dist. No. 2005-2348.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 Am. Retirement Corp. v. Johnson. No. 2005-2024.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86648. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Smith. No. 2005-1982.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Washington App. No. 04CA47, 2005-Ohio-4910. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. II and hold the cause for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. […]

842 N.E.2d 62, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Miller. No. 2005-2101.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85564, 2005-Ohio-4583. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, […]

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Waire. No. 2005-1987.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040782, 2005-Ohio-4853. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2005-2336, State v. Baehler, Cuyahoga App. No. 85796, 2005-Ohio-5717. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Shoulders. No. 2005-1999.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Hancock App. No. 5-05-05, 2005-Ohio-4749. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1439

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Dunham. No. 2005-1634.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Scioto App. No. 04CA2931, 2005-Ohio-3642. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Stevenson. No. 2005-2001.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005-CA-00011, 2005-Ohio-5216. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 60, 2006-Ohio-421 State ex rel. Browning v. Fleegle. No. 2005-2404.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. In Mandamus and Procedendo. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On answer of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

842 N.E.2d 61, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Oliver. No. 2005-1967.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85606, 2005-Ohio-4411. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Griffin. No. 2005-1741.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Allen App. No. 1-03-31, 2004-Ohio-287. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 107 Ohio St.3d 1684, 2005-Ohio-6480, 839 N.E.2d 404. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. Page 1442

842 N.E.2d 62, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Rogers. No. 2005-2059.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005CA00055, 2005-Ohio-4958. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 837-90, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. […]

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Fritz. No. 2005-1943.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 20796, 163 Ohio App.3d 276, 2005-Ohio-4736. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 Westfield Ins. Co. v. Milwaukee Insurance Co. No. 2005-2020.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2004-12-298, 2005-Ohio-4746. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and O’CONNOR, J., dissent. Page 1440

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 Burney v. A-Best Prod. Co. No. 2005-2012.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86762. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent. O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

842 N.E.2d 64, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Moore. No. 2005-2003.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85451, 2005-Ohio-4699. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents. O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

842 N.E.2d 63, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Lyons. No. 2005-1976.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0035, 2005-Ohio-4649. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

842 N.E.2d 65, 2006-Ohio-421 State v. Smith. No. 2005-2064.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. Portage App. No. 2004-P-0061, 2005-Ohio-4899. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

842 N.E.2d 60, 2006-Ohio-421 State ex rel. McGee v. Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate Dist. No. 2005-2239.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 8, 2006. In Prohibition. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On respondent’s answer and motion for summary judgment and relator’s motion for default judgment. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, […]