2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Wilson. No. 2006-1106.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Putnam App. No. 1205 20, 2006-Ohio-2006. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.
Articles Tagged: 2006-Ohio-5083
STATE v. COX, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Cox. No. 2006-1120.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Delaware App. Nos. 05CAA060041 and 05CAA070043, 2006-Ohio-2097. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MAYNARD v. H.A.M., 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Maynard v. H.A.M. Landscaping, Inc. No. 2006-1075.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86191, 166 Ohio App.3d 76, 2006-Ohio-1724. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER JJ., dissent.
SKYY PROPERTIES v. CINCINNATI, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Skyy Properties, LLC v. Cincinnati. No. 2006-1231.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050051. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. AVERY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Avery. No. 2006-1052.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Sandusky App. No. S-05-017, 2006-Ohio-1862. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
EX REL. OF HARDS v. KLAMMER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Estate of Hards v. Klammer. No. 2005-1223.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lake App. No. 2004-L-189, 2005-Ohio-2655. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 104, 2006-Ohio-3670, 850 N.E.2d 1197. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration and motion to strike memorandum opposing motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration denied. Motion to […]
ZENFA LABS, v. BIG LOTS STORES, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Zenfa Labs, Inc. v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. No. 2006-1131.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-343, 2006-Ohio-2069. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. ORTEGA, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Ortega. No. 2006-1158.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008657, 2006-Ohio-2177. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1414
STATE v. REYNOLDS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Reynolds. No. 2006-1337.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Allen App. No. 1-02-70, 2003-Ohio-2067. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
FAIRAND v. UROLOGY SURGEONS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Fairand v. Urology Surgeons, Inc. No. 2006-1109.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-1066, 2006-Ohio-2266. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1413
PACK v. OSBORN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Pack v. Osborn. No. 2006-1207.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Licking App. No. 05 CA 83, 2006-Ohio-2253. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2006-1343, Pack v. Osborn, Licking App. No. 05 CA 83, 2006-Ohio-2253. LANZINGER, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II only. RESNICK, […]
PROCTOR v. KARDASSILARIS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Proctor v. Kardassilaris. No. 2006-1242.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2005-T-0026, 2006-Ohio-2385. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIPER, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. PATTERSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Patterson. No. 2006-1047.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Washington App. No. 05CA16, 2006-Ohio-1902. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
WATERS v. BUTLER CTY. CLERK OF COURTS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Waters v. Butler Cty. Clerk of Courts. No. 2006-1317.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On respondent’s motion to dismiss and relator’s motion for summary judgment. Motion for summary judgment denied. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL […]
STATE v. DAILEY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Dailey. No. 2006-1222.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050145. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STEVENS v. CREATIVE CONTROL, INC., 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Stevens v. Creative Controls, Inc. No. 2006-1273.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 21240, 2006-Ohio-2660. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. MUTTART, 111 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Muttart. No. 2006-1488.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hancock App. No. 5-05-08, 2006-Ohio-2506. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed July […]
STATE v. TOWLER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Towler. No. 2006-1194.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-387, 2006-Ohio-2441. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
JRC HOL. v. SAMSEL SERV. CO., 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 JRC Holdings, Inc. v. Samsel Servs. Co. No. 2006-1123.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Portage App. No. 2005-P-0028, 166 Ohio App.3d 328, 2006-Ohio-2148. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. SMITH, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Smith. No. 2006-1119.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Stark App. No. 2006CA00075. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
WARMACK v. ONE BEACON INS. CO., 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Warmack v. One Beacon Inc, Co. No. 2006-1084.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C050410, 2006-Ohio-1954. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. O’DONNELL, J., not participating.
STATE v. AUSBORN., 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Ausborn. No. 2006-1100.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Miami App. No. 2005 CA 25, 2006-Ohio-2105. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
EX REL. HARRISON v. NICHOLS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Harrison v. Nichols. No. 2006-1423.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Prohibition. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On respondent’s answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
NORTHERN v. MED. MUT. OF OHIO., 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Northern v. Med. Mut. of Ohio. No. 2006-0885.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86527, 2006-Ohio-1075. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1442, 2006-Ohio-3862, 852 N.E.2d 189. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO. v. McCLELLAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Atlantic Richfield Co. v. McClellan. No. 2006-1213.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2005-T-0053, 2006-Ohio-1701. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. TAYLOR, 111 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Taylor. No. 2006-1567.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86449, 2006-Ohio-3019. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.
ABRAMS v. SIEGEL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Abrams v. Siegel. No. 2006-1076.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 86386 and 86659. 166 Ohio App.3d 230, 2006-Ohio-1728. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. PEOPLES, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Peoples. No. 2006-1223.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. Nos. C-050167 and C-050168. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
STATE v. HAMILTON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Hamilton. No. 2006-1281.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86520, 2006-Ohio-1949. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MINSHALL v. CLEVELAND ILLUM. CO., 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Minshall v. Cleveland Ilium. Co. No. 2006-1185.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lake App. No. 2004-L-156, 2006-Ohio-2241. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.
STATE v. GASKINS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Gaskins. No. 2006-1227.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050631. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
UNITED TEL. CREDIT UNION, v. ROBERTS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 United Tel. Credit Union, Inc. v. Roberts. No. 2006-1174.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. Nos. 05AP-827 and 05AP-870, 2006-Ohio-2198. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II. Page 1410 PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of […]
JONES v. EBERLIN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Jones v. Eberlin. No. 2006-1461.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Cecil Jones, Jr. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
TOLLIVER v. LIBERTY MUT. GRO., 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Tolliver v. Liberty Mut. Group. No. 2006-1254.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-753, 2006-Ohio-2443. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
LONG v. LONG, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Long v. Long. No. 2006-1221.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050567, 2006-Ohio-2341. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.
CHESTNUT v. PRO. CAS. INS. CO., 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Chestnut v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. No. 2006-1196.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 84376, 166 Ohio App.3d 299, 2006-Ohio-2080. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. RALPH, 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Ralph. No. 2006-1087.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Muskingum App. No. CT060019. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CARSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Carson. No. 2006-1270.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-13, 2006-Ohio-2440. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. STEPHENS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Stephens. No. 2006-1088.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-060255. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
SILVER v. STATZ, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Silver v. Statz. No. 2006-1063.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86384, 166 Ohio App.3d 148, 2006-Ohio-1727. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. MOLNAR, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Molnar. No. 2006-1316.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Summit App. No. 22714, 2006-Ohio-2981. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. FISHER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Fisher. No. 2006-1173.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Delaware App. No. 05 CAA 04 020, 2006-Ohio-2201. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II.
PACK v. OSBORN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Pack v. Osborn. No. 2006-1343.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Licking App. No. 05 CA 83, 2006-Ohio-2253. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry […]
IN RE J.B., 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 In re J.B. No. 2006-1345.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Butler App. Nos. CA2005-06-176, CA2005-07-193 and CA2005-08-377, 2006-Ohio-2715. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. MOSES, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Moses. No. 2006-1351.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Richland App. No. 05 CA 130, 2006-Ohio-3029. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
SMITH v. SEBASTIANI, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Smith v. Sebastiani. No. 2006-1053.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 05 MA 57, 2006-Ohio-2189. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STORER v. SHARP, 111 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Storer v. Sharp. No. 2006-0964.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86525, 2006-Ohio-1577. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1443, 2006-Ohio-3862, 852 N.E.2d 190. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.
STATE v. SMITH, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Smith. No. 2006-1342.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Clark App. No. 2004-CA-10, 2005-Ohio-7071. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. GRIFFIN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Griffin. No. 2006-1552.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Summit App. No. 23306. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
STATE v. HARRIEL., 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Harriel. No. 2006-1291.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040771, 2006-Ohio-2616. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. SIMMS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Simms. No. 2006-0986.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Athens App. No. 05CA10, 165 Ohio App.3d 83, 2005-Ohio-5681. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1409, 2006-Ohio-3306, 850 N.E.2d 71. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
KEATON v. GORDON BIERSCH BREWERY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Keaton v. Gordon Biersch Brewery Restaurant Group, Inc. No. 2006-1298.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-110, 2006-Ohio-2438. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. PALMER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Palmer. No. 2006-1496.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Jefferson App. No. 04-JE-41, 2006-Ohio-749. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
BRYAN-WOLLMAN v. DOMONKOS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Bryan-Wollman v. Domonkos. No. 2006-1201.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86429, 2006-Ohio-2318. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
EX REL. MOORE v. CUYAHOGA, 111 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Moore v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas. No. 2006-1258.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss and motion to amend complaint. Motion to amend complaint denied. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and […]
STATE EX REL. DANN v. TAFT, 111 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Dann v. Taft. No. 2005-1222.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Mandamus. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for an award of attorney fees and costs. Motion denied. RESNICK, J., dissents.
STATE v. COCKRELL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Cockrell. No. 2006-1280.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 86701 and 86703, 2006-Ohio-2301. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.
FEATHERSTONE v. COLOMBUS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Featherstone v. Columbus. No. 2006-1365.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 06AP-89, 2006-Ohio-3150. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1418
STATE v. BAEZ, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Baez. No. 2006-1238.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 06AP-254. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. DIDUKOVICH, 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Dudukovich. No. 2006-0894.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008729, 2006-Ohio-1309. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1442, 2006-Ohio-3862, 852 N.E.2d 189. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. Page 1419 LUNDBEEG STEATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent and would hold the cause for the decision in 2006-1245 […]
STATE v. LASHLEY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Lashley. No. 2006-1072.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Stark App. No. 2004CA00246. 2006-Ohio-1921. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1412 MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
STATE v. FULLER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Fuller. No. 2006-1506.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 20658, 2005-Ohio-3696. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., dissents.
OHIO v. FREEMAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Freeman. No. 2006-1252.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hancock App. No. 5-05-17, 2006-Ohio-2372. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. ROBERTS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Roberts. No. 2003-1441.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Trumbull C.P. Ol-CR-793. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 71, 2006-Ohio-3665, 850 N.E.2d 1168. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
OVERLY v. COLUMBIANA CTY. ENG., 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Overly v. Columbiana Cty. Engineer. No. 2006-1101.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Columbiana App. No. 05-CO-9, 2006-Ohio-2188. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
McKINNEY v. EBERLIN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 McKinney v. Eberlin. No. 2006-1462.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Tony Randall McKinney. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
EX REL. GORDON v. MURPHY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Gordon v. Murphy. No. 2006-1588.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Summit App. No. 23295. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of further execution of sentence and motion for release on personal recognizance pending appeal. Motions denied. MOYER, C.J., dissents. Page 1409
STATE v. MEADOWS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Meadows. No. 2006-1237.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-05-1321, 2006-Ohio-2622 and 2006-Ohio-3375. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion for stay denied.
STATE v. PARKS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Parks. No. 2006-0173.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Carroll App. No. 04 CA 803, 2005-Ohio-6926. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. PIERCE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Pierce. No. 2006-1320.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 21561. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STEVENS v. JEFFREYS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Stevens v. Jeffreys. No. 2006-1513.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of John B. Stevens. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. SMITH, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Smith. No. 2006-1313.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008772, 2006-Ohio-2045. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. HAMPTON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Hampton. No. 2006-1438.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-806, 2005-Ohio-7023. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
HESKETT v. OHIO, 111 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Heskett v. Ohio Dept. of Adm. Servs. No. 2006-1381.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-1011, 2006-Ohio-2074. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2006-0107, Hughes v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce, Franklin […]
STATE v. ROBINSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Robinson. No. 2006-1233.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Summit App. No. 22941, 2006-Ohio-2283. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CAYSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Cayson. No. 2006-1096.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0118, 2006-Ohio-2011. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
AHLERS v. PETTINELLI, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Ahlers v. Pettinelli. No. 2006-1066.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86257, 2006-Ohio-1199. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.
ZAPPOLA v. LEIBINGER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Zappola v. Leibinger. No. 2006-1248.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 86038 and 86102, 2006-Ohio-2207. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE v. MUTTART, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Muttart. No. 2006-1293.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hancock App. No. 5-05-08, 2006-Ohio-2506. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2006-1488, State v. Muttart, Hancock App. No. 5-05-08, 2006-Ohio-2506. LANZINGER, J., not participating.
EX REL. JONES v. COLLINS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Jones v. Collins. No. 2006-1246.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFEE, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. Page 1405
STATE v. SIDES, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Sides. No. 2006-1364.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lake App. No. 2005-L-175, 2006-Ohio-2778. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MINSTER FARMER’S COOP. EX. CO., v. DUES., 111 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Minster Farmer’s Coop. Exchange Co., Inc. v. Dues. No. 2006-1069.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Shelby App. No. 17-05-28, 2006-Ohio-1887. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal accepted. RESNICK, O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
FREDERICK v. COCCA DEV., 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Frederick v. Cocca Dev., Ltd. No. 2006-1234.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 05 MA 107. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. SCHLEE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Schlee. No. 2006-1225.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lake App. No. 2004-L-207, 2006-Ohio-2391. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
INT. DIESEL SER., v. KURZ-KASCH, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Interstate Diesel Serv., Inc. v. Kurz-Kasch, Inc. No. 2006-1239.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87943. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. On motion for admission pro hac vice of G. Thomas Williams by George W. Rooney, Jr. Motion granted.
EX REL. KING v. DEPT. OF TAXATION, 111 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. King v. Ohio Dept. of Taxation. No. 2006-0977.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Mandamus. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1433, 2006-Ohio-3862, 852 N.E.2d 184. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE v. RILEY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Riley. No. 2006-1215.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Pike App. No. 06CA747. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. ELLISON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Ellison. No. 2006-1459.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050553, 2006-Ohio-2620. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. COCKRELL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Cockrell. No. 2006-1282.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-487, 2005-Ohio-2432. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
HOUCK v. BD. OF PARK, 111 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs., Huron Cty. Park Dist. No. 2006-1262.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Huron App. No. H-05-018, 2006-Ohio-2488. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. MOYER, C.J., […]
STATE v. MILLER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Miller. No. 2006-1362.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2005-02-048, 2006-Ohio-2799. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. ABNEY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Abney. No. 2006-0423.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 84190, 2006-Ohio-273. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. GUESS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Guess. No. 2006-0900.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 06AP-151. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1442, 2006-Ohio-3862, 852 N.E.2d 190. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE v. BUTLER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Butler. No. 2006-1133.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050693. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
BENSON v. EBERLIN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Benson v. Eberlin. No. 2006-1456.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Darryl L. Benson. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. Page 1406
DATER v. CHARLES H. DATER FOUNDATION, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Dater v. Charles H. Dater Found., Inc. No. 2006-1277.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050262, 2006-Ohio-2479. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents.
STATE v. CARR, 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Carr. No. 2006-1503.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Clermont App. No. CA2004-01-006, 2005-Ohio-417. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
KEAVENEY v. PARROTT, 111 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Keaveney v. Parrott. No. 2006-1004.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1408, 2006-Ohio-3306, 850 N.E.2d 70. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. EVANS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Evans. No. 2006-1228.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Scioto App. No. 05CA3002, 2006-Ohio-2564. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STEELE v. TOWNE AIR FREIGHT, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Steele v. Towne Air Freight. No. 2006-1135.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005CA00276, 2006-Ohio-2187. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.