2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Hall. No. 2006-1335.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 21491. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
Articles Tagged: 2006-Ohio-5083
STATE v. IP., 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Ip. No. 2006-1294.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86243, 2006-Ohio-2303. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MBNA AM. BANK, N.A. v. ANTHONY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 MBNA Am. Bank, N.A. v. Anthony. No. 2006-1062.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Tuscarawas App. No. 05AP090059, 2006-Ohio-2032. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents. O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
LYNCH v. NATL. CITY BANK, 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Lynch v. Natl. City Bank. No. 2006-0664.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87352. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1411, 2006- Ohio-3306, 850 N.E.2d 72. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
CASE v. HARRISON CTY., 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Case v. Harrison Cty. Court of Common Pleas. No. 2006-1141.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-792, 2006-Ohio-2444. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion to consolidate denied as moot.
STATE v. FOGEL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Fogel. No. 2006-1049.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87035, 2006-Ohio-1613. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. SHIE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Shie. No. 2006-1272.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86464, 2006-Ohio-2314. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. NICHOLSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Nicholson. No. 2006-1283.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 82825, 2004-Ohio-2394. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. TURNER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Turner. No. 2003-0346.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin C.P. No. 01CR-06-3615. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to set execution date. Motion denied.
WATTERSON v. KING, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Watterson v. King. No. 2006-1208.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005-CA-00283, 2006-Ohio-2305. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. FEAGIN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Feagin. No. 2006-1323.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Richland App. No. 05 CA 1, 2006-Ohio-676. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MIKE McGARRY SONS, v. GROSS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Mike McGarry Sons, Inc. v. Gross. No. 2006-1218.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86603, 2006-Ohio-1759. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1415
STATE v. LUTHER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Luther. No. 2006-1171.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008770, 2006-Ohio-2280. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. STONER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Stoner. No. 2006-1136.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Ottawa App. No. OT-05-042, 2006-Ohio-2122. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
STATE v. JACKSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Jackson. No. 2006-1180.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86755, 2006-Ohio-2468. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.
STATE v. GONZALES, 111 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Gonzales. No. 2006-0976.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87412. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1409, 2006-Ohio-3306, 850 N.E.2d 71. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
KREMER v. ROWSE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Kremer v. Rowse. No. 2006-1128.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 21311, 2006-Ohio-992 and 2006-Ohio-2336. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.
McGUFFIN v. ZAREMBA CON., 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 McGuffin v. Zaremba Contracting. No. 2006-1125.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86594, 166 Ohio App.3d 142, 2006-Ohio-1734. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent. RESNICK, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
VARGAS v. COLUMBUS PUB. SCHOOLS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Vargas v. Columbus Pub. Schools. No. 2006-1203.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-658. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
DUFFY v. NOURSE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Duffy v. Nourse Family of Dealerships — Chillicothe, Inc. No. 2006-1105.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Ross App. No. 05CA2846, 2006-Ohio-2057. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. JENKINS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Jenkins. No. 2006-1236.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lawrence App. No. 05CA7, 2006-Ohio-2546. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents. O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III.
KIENZLE v. MYERS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Kienzle v. Myers. No. 2006-1265.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Wood App. Nos. WD-05-068 and WD-05-078, 2006-Ohio-2765. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
SCELZA v. MIKHAEL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Scelza v. Mikhael. No. 2006-1050.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. SUMMIT App. No. 22859, 2006-Ohio-1821. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. LEWIS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Lewis. No. 2006-1560.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87276. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
LIVERPOOL v. COLUMBIANA CTY. BUDGET COMM., 111 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 E. Liverpool v. Columbiana Cty. Budget Comm. No. 2006-1129.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2003-T-1301, 2004-T-844 and 2005-T-1474. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to intervene of Sherrie L. Curtis and John Torma. Motion denied. PFEIFEE, J., dissents.
STATE v. HAIRSTON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Hairston. No. 2006-1530.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 20751, 2006-Ohio-2656. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
SEGER v. FOR WOMEN, INC., Unpublished Decision (10-4-2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Seger v. For Women, Inc., 2006-Ohio-4855. No. 2005-0556.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Hamilton App. No. C-040317, 2005-Ohio-528. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur separately.
STATE v. FITTS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Fitts. No. 2006-1357.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005CA00092, 2006-Ohio-678. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. VASQUEZ, 111 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Vasquez. No. 2006-1409.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 79319. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. LATHAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Lathan. No. 2006-1269.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-03-1188, 2006-Ohio-2490. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., not participating.
STATE v. SMITH, 111 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Smith. No. 2006-1432.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Greene App. No. 2005 CA 70, 2006-Ohio-2132. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent. Page 1408
STATE v. WILLIAMS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Williams. No. 2006-1168.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-339, 2006-Ohio-2197. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. MILLETTE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Millette. No. 2006-1117.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Licking App. No. 05 CA 79, 2006-Ohio-2099. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
EX REL. HONDA v. INDUS. COMM., 111 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. No. 2005-2006.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-765, 2005-Ohio-4672. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On request for oral argument. Request denied.
STATE v. JACKSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Jackson. No. 2003-0137.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Trumbull C.P. No. Ol-CR-794. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6). Application denied.
MARRON v. USAA CAS. INS. CO., 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Marron v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. No. 2006-1160.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2005-07-204, 2006-Ohio-2247. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. FUNK, 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. FUNK. No. 2006-1099.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-230, 2006-Ohio-2068. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MAHONING CTY. BAR ASSN. v. OLIVITO, 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Olivito. No. 2005-2030.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Board of Commissioners on Grievances Discipline, No. 04-082. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 64, 2006-Ohio-3564, 850 N.E.2d 702. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE v. BROWN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Brown. No. 2006-1085.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Summit App. No. 22770, 2006-Ohio-1905. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. TATE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Tate. No. 2006-1480.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 06 MA 5. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that no conflict exists. This cause is therefore dismissed. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. RESNICK, LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., […]
MANLEY v. MARISCO, 111 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Manley v. Marisco. No. 2006-1263.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Clinton App. No. CA2006-04-013. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I. MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. RESNICK, PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. POWERS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Powers. No. 2006-1139.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86381, 2006-Ohio-1942. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE BEATTY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 In re Beatty. No. 2006-1627.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Tuscarawas App. No. 2006AP040022, 2006-Ohio-3698. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed August […]
ORIANA HOUSE, INC. v. MONTGOMERY, Unpublished Decision (10-4-2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Oriana House, Inc. v. Montgomery, 2006-Ohio-4854. No. 2005-1505.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Franklin App. Nos. 04AP-492 and 04AP-504, 2005-Ohio-3377. Judgment reversed. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Resnick and […]
STATE v. WRIGHT., 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Wright. No. 2006-1195.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050020. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. JOSEPH, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Joseph. No. 2006-1363.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050363.
STATE v. RAZO, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Razo. No. 2006-1354.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lorain App. No. 03CA008263, 2004-Ohio-3405. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
WATKINS v. COLLINS, Unpublished Decision (10-4-2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Watkins v. Collins, 2006-Ohio-5082. No. 2006-1634.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. Writ denied. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., concurs in judgment only. Lanzinger, J., dissents.
EX REL. STEVENS v. INDUS. COMM., 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Stevens v. Indus. Comm. No. 2005-1105.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-919, 2005-Ohio-2804. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 32, 2006-Ohio-3456, 850 N.E.2d 55. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
IN RE SPEARS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 In re Spears. No. 2006-1074.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Licking App. No. 2005-CA-93, 2006-Ohio-1920. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. ROSEBOROUGH, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Roseborough. No. 2006-1172.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Ashland App. No. 04 COA 085, 2006-Ohio-2254. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
OTTAWA HILLS v. AFJEH., 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Ottawa Hills v. Afjeh. No. 2006-1309.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-04-1297, 2006-Ohio-2618. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., not participating.
STATE v. HLAVSA, 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Hlavsa. No. 2006-1104.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 97939. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
SUMSER-ARMSTRONG v. ARMSTRONG, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Sumser-Armstrong v. Armstrong. No. 2006-1065.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005-CA-00245, 2006-Ohio-1924. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CONGRESS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Congress. No. 2006-1314.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86553, 2006-Ohio-2081. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. PAYNE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Payne. No. 2006-1245.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-517, 2006-Ohio-2552. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2006-1383, State v. Payne, Franklin App. No. 05AP-517, 2006-Ohio-2552. RESNICK, J., dissents.
STATE v. CARSWELL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Carswell. No. 2006-0151.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Warren App. No. CA2005-04-047, 2005-Ohio-6547. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for admission pro hac vice of Camilla B. Taylor by Alphonse A. Gerhardstein and motions for admission pro hac vice of Michael T. Haas, Helen Gerostathos Guyton, and Fernando R. Laguarda by […]
STATE v. ROBINSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Robinson. No. 2006-1255.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Greene App. No. 2005 CA 62, 2006-Ohio-2650. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2006-0151, State v. Carswell, Warren App. No. CA2005-04-047, 2005-Ohio-6547; and briefing schedule stayed.
INDIANA INS. CO. v. MURPHY., 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Indiana Ins. Co. v. Murphy. No. 2006-0859.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Allen App. No. 1-05-40, 165 Ohio App.3d 812, 2006-Ohio-1264. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1441, 2006-Ohio-3862, 852 N.E.2d 189. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
GRIMM v. SUMMIT CTY. CHILDREN SERV. BD., 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Grimm v. Summit Cty. Children Servs. Bd. No. 2006-1264.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Summit App. No. 22702, 2006-Ohio-2411. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal not accepted. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.
DOE v. ARCHDIOCESE OF CINCINNATI, 111 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati. No. 2006-1155.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050438, 2006-Ohio-2221. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents. RESNICK and LANZINGER, JJ., not participating.
STATE v. McDOWELL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. McDowell. No. 2006-1244.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 21156, 2006-Ohio-2642. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1416
STATE v. LUTHER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Luther. No. 2006-1170.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008771, 2006-Ohio-2414. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE ESTATE OF PALLAY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 In re Estate of Pallay. No. 2006-1543.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Washington App. No. 05CA45, 2006-Ohio-3528. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment and motion for award of costs, expenses and fees. Motions denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. SHELTON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Shelton. No. 2006-0604.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040658, 165 Ohio App.3d 142, 2006-Ohio-182. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
WATSON v. THOMPSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Watson v. Thompson. No. 2006-1620.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Muskingum App. No. CT2005-0060, 2006-Ohio-3828. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
STATE v. WOODS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. WOODS. No. 2006-1143.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Allen App. No. 1-05-82, 2006-Ohio-2368. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. MOORE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Moore. No. 2006-1645.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86630, 2006-Ohio-3680. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
PROCTOR v. BLANK, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Proctor v. Blank. No. 2006-1243.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2005-T-0027, 2006-Ohio-2386. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIPER, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. LOGSDON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Logsdon. No. 2006-1330.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Seneca App. No. 13-05-29, 2006-Ohio-2938. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2006-0151, State v. Carswell, Warren App. No. CA2OO5-04-047, 2005-Ohio-6547; and briefing schedule […]
STATE v. OGLETREE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Ogletree. No. 2006-1276.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86500, 2006-Ohio-2320. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of proceedings. Motion denied.
IN RE ESTATE OF HOWARD, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 In re Estate of Howard. No. 2006-1175.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008730, 2006-Ohio-2176. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. BUTTS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Butts. No. 2006-1044.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Licking App. No. 05-CA-88, 2006-Ohio-1918. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE EX REL. INGRAM v. ADULT PAROLE AUTH., 111 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Ingram v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. No. 2006-1423.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On answer of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
DAVIS v. DAVIS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Davis v. Davis. No. 2006-1250.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Geauga App. No. 2005-G-2646, 2006-Ohio-2393. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. O’CONNOR, J., not participating.
INDUS. ENERGY USERS v. PUB. UTIL. COMM., 111 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Indus. Energy Users-Ohio v. Pub. Util. Comm. No. 2006-1257.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Prohibition. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motions for leave to intervene of Columbus Southern Power Company, Ohio Power Company, and Ohio Energy Group. Motions denied. PFEIFER and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent. On motion to dismiss of […]
STATE v. WHATLEY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Whatley. No. 2006-1285.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86267, 2006-Ohio-2465. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1417
STATE EX REL. HAND v. GIAVASIS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Hand v. Giavasis. No. 2006-1319.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. PEOPLES, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Peoples. No. 2006-1204.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050620, 2006-Ohio-2614. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
WELLS v. C.J., 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Wells v. C.J. Mahan Constr. Co. No. 2006-1054.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. Nos. 05AP-180 and 05AP-183, 2006-Ohio-1831. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER C.J., and RESNICK, J., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
TALIAFERRO v. S. POINTE HOSP., 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Taliaferro v. S. Pointe Hosp. No. 2006-1151.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86999, 2006-Ohio-1611. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. KARASEK, 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Karasek. No. 2006-1390.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Montgomery App. Nos. 19565, 20253, 20316, 20399, 20868 and 20935. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. BOWLING, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Bowling. No. 2006-1251.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Knox App. No. 05 CA 28, 2006-Ohio-2567. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
COTTON v. ROTHGERY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Cotton v. Rothgery. No. 2006-1274.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Procedendo and Prohibition. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE v. STRODES, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Strodes. No. 2006-1154.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Clark App. No. 05CA0070, 2006-Ohio-2335. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
NEWELL v. GAUL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Newell v. Gaul. No. 2006-1411.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Procedendo and Prohibition. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On respondent’s motion to dismiss and relator’s motion to strike respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion to strike denied. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., […]
STATE v. BENNETT., 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Bennett. No. 2006-1299.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Scioto App. No. 05CA2997, 2006-Ohio-2757. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
WALLS v. TOLEDO, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Walls v. Toledo. No. 2006-1127.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-05-1185, 166 Ohio App.3d 349, 2006-Ohio-2111. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. PARKS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Parks. No. 2006-0868.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 20905, 2005-Ohio-6395. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1413, 2006-Ohio-3306, 850 N.E.2d 73. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE v. HUFFMAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Huffman. No. 2006-0799.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050044, 165 Ohio App.3d 518, 2006-Ohio-1106. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for relief from stay of Page 1407 briefing schedule. Motion denied. LANZINGER, J., dissents.
STATE v. BRAGG, 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Bragg. No. 2006-1078.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-100, 2006-Ohio-1903. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MIDDLETOWN v. WHIPP, 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Middletown v. Whipp. No. 2006-1073.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2005-06-154, 2006-Ohio-1899. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
UNION SAV. BANK v. WHITE FAMILY COS., 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Union Savings Bank v. White Family Cos., Inc. No. 2006-1268.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 21137, 2006-Ohio-2629. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. HINKLE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Hinkle. No. 2006-1400.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Stark App. No. 2006CA00083. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
EVERETT v. EBERLIN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Everett v. Eberlin. No. 2006-1205.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1435, 2006-Ohio-3862, 852 N.E.2d 185. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
VALENTINE v. CONRAD, 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Valentine v. Conrad. No. 2004-1619.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Pickaway App. No. 03CA17, 158 Ohio App.3d 615, 2004-Ohio-4521. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 42, 2006-Ohio-3561, 850 N.E.2d 683. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. RESNICK, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
ST. NIKOLA v. ZORAN., 111 Ohio St.3d 1417 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 St. Nikola Macedonian Orthodox Church v. Zoran. No. 2006-1311.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Summit App. No. 22666, 2006-Ohio-2561. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal not accepted.
HESKETT v. DEPT. OF ADM. SERVS., 111 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Heskett v. Ohio Dept. of Adm. Servs. No. 2006-1041.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-1011, 2006-Ohio-2074. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted, cause held for the decision in 2006-0107, Hughes v. Oiiio Dept. of Commerce, Franklin App. No. 04AP-1386, 2005-Ohio-6368; cause consolidated with 2006-1381, Heskett v. Ohio Dept. of […]
STATE v. NOLAND, 111 Ohio St.3d 1414 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Noland. No. 2006-1217.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Washington App. Nos. 02CA28 and 04CA9, 2003-Ohio-1386 and 2004-Ohio-5944. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MINSTER FARMER’S COOP. v. MEYER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5083 Minster Farmer’s Coop. Exchange Co., Inc. v. Meyer. No. 2006-1061.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Shelby App. No. 17-05-32, 2006-Ohio-1886. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal accepted. RESNICK, O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.