2006-Ohio-5083 – Page 3

STATE v. CRISP, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Crisp. No. 2006-1271.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Allen App. No. 1-05-45, 2006-Ohio-2509. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

SAND GRAVEL, v. HOWARD TWP. BD., 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 Small’s Sand Gravel, Inc. v. Howard Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals. No. 2006-1267.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Knox App. No. 05CA0021, 2006-Ohio-2451. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. DAVIS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Davis. No. 2006-1256.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Greene App. No. 2005 CA 60, 2006-Ohio-2633. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2006-0151, State v. Carswell, Warren App. No. CA2005-04-047, 2005-Ohio-6547; and briefing schedule stayed.

STATE v. PARKS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Parks. No. 2006-0174.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Columbiana App. No. 04 CO 19, 2005-Ohio-6926. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

NIEPSUJ v. SUMMIT CTY. CT. , 111 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Niepsuj v. Summit Cty. Court of Common Pleas. No. 2006-1329.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

MARTIN v. EBERLIN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 Martin v. Eberlin. No. 2006-1059.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1434, 2006-Ohio-3862, 852 N.E.2d 184. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

McLAUGHLIN v. FIRELANDS COMM. HOSP., 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 McLaughlin v. Firelands Community Hosp. No. 2006-1094.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Erie App. No. E-05-011, 2006-Ohio-1984. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

COLUMBUS v. ELLYSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 Columbus v. Ellyson. No. 2006-1138.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-573, 2006-Ohio-2075. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

EX REL. PETRO v. GOLD., 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Petro v. Gold. No. 2006-0758.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-863, 2006-Ohio-943. Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 1439, 2006-Ohio-3862, 852 N.E.2d 188. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

STATE v. LEWIS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Lewis. No. 2006-0724.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Summit App. No. 22534, 2006-Ohio-654. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

McLEOD v. MT. SINAI MED. CTR., 111 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 McLeod v. Mt. Sinai Med. Ctr. No. 2006-1247.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 85286, 85574 and 85605, 2006-Ohio-2206. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Brett M. Wood and Deborah E. Berliner by Jack Beam. […]

STATE v. GREEN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1416 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Green. No. 2006-1266.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 05 MA 116, 2006-Ohio-3097. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

EX REL. KROGER CO. v. PAYSEN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. Paysen. No. 2005-1582.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-810, 2005-Ohio-3787. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 515, 2006-Ohio-3057, 849 N.E.2d 289. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

LINGO v. OHIO CENT. RR., 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 Lingo v. Ohio Cent. RR., Inc. No. 2006-1220.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-206, 2006-Ohio-2268. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

MARSHALL v. RUSSO, 111 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 Marshall v. Russo. No. 2006-1460.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. In Prohibition. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On respondent’s motions to dismiss and for sanctions for frivolous action, respondent’s motions for issuance of an alternative writ and for injunctive relief, respondent’s motion to strike relator’s motions opposing motion to dismiss, for issuance of an […]

BAY COAST PRO. v. NATL. CITY BANK, 111 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 Bay Coast Properties, Inc. v. Natl. City Bank. No. 2006-1226.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Huron App. No. H-05-015, 2006-Ohio-2348. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. LEAVALLY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Levally. No. 2006-1435.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Union App. No. 14-05-28, 2006-Ohio-1882. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

GLIOZZO v. UNIV. UROLOGISTS OF CLEVELAND, 111 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 Gliozzo v. Univ. Urologists of Cleveland, Inc. No. 2006-1166.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86371, 2006-Ohio-1726. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

EUCLID v. GAGE-VAUGHN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 Euclid v. Gage-Vaughn. No. 2006-1103.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86498, 2006-Ohio-1941. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF HOLLINS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 In re Guardianship of Hollins. No. 2006-1137.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 86412 and 86574, 2006-Ohio-1543. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON. JJ., dissent. Amended motion for summary reversal and motion to strike amended motion for summary reversal denied.

STATE v. PAYNE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Payne. No. 2006-1383.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-517, 2006-Ohio-2552. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Memorandum Decision filed July […]

STATE v. DOUGLAS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1410 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5083 State v. Douglas. No. 2006-1292.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 4, 2006. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 86567 and 86568, 2006-Ohio-2343. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2006-0151, State v. Carswell, Warren App. No. CA2005-04-047, 2005-Ohio-6547; and briefing schedule stayed. Page 1411

Articles Tagged: 2006-Ohio-5083