2006-Ohio-6171 – LexRoll (OH)

TAXATION v. FREEMAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1495 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Ohio Dept. Taxation v. Freeman. 2006-1252.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Hancock App. No. 5-05-17, 2006-Ohio-2372. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 111 Ohio St.3d 1416, 2006-Ohio-5083, 854 N.E.2d 1093. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

STRIDSBERG v. GEICO GEN. INS. CO., Unpublished Decision (11-29-2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Stridsberg v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 2006-Ohio-5855. No. 2005-2128.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Hamilton App. No. C-040689. Sua sponte, cause dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. Moyer, C.J., Klatt, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, […]

TRAN v. KIMBLER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Tran v. Kimbler. 2006-1660.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Procedendo. On answer of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

FISHPAW v. FRANCISCO, 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Fishpaw v. Francisco. 2006-1515.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-861, 2006-Ohio-3450. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. HASSLER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Hassler. 2006-1517.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Delaware App. No. 05 CAA 11 0078, 2006-Ohio-3397. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. TURNER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Turner. 2006-1824.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Licking App. No. 05CA108, 2006-Ohio-3786. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

BAKER v. ADAMS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Baker v. Adams. 2006-1476.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Logan App. No. 8-05-17, 2006-Ohio-3232. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

STATE v. TRENT, 111 Ohio St.3d 1490 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Trent. 2006-1883.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Licking App. No. 05CA101, 2006-Ohio-3132. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

SPENCER v. LAKEVIEW SCL. DIST., 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Spencer v. Lakeview School Dist. 2006-1527.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2005-T-0083, 2006-Ohio-3429. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

YARAB v. BOARDMAN TWP., 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Yarab v. Boardman Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals. 2006-1519.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 04 MA 266, 2006-Ohio-3565. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. DACH, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Dach. 2006-1533.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Trumbull App. Nos. 2005-T-0048 and 2005-T-0054, 2006-Ohio-3428. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., not participating.

HUFFMAN v. BD. OF CTY. COMMRS., 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Huffman v. Bd. of Cty. Commrs. 2006-1518.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Columbiana App. No. 05 CO 71, 2006-Ohio-3479. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.

PROCTOR v. KARDASSILARIS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1495 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Proctor v. Kardassilaris. 2005-1242.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2005-T-0026, 2006-Ohio-2385. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 111 Ohio St.3d 1415, 2006-Ohio-5083, 854 N.E.2d 1093. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and discretionary appeal accepted. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-1243, Proctor v. Blank, Trumbull App. No. 2005-T-0027, 2006-Ohio-2386. RESNICK, […]

COTTON v. ROTHGERY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1495 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Cotton v. Rothgery. 2006-1274.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS In Procedendo and Prohibition. Reported at 111 Ohio St.3d 1405, 2006-Ohio-5083, 854 N.E.2d 1086. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. Page 1496

STATE v. IBARRA, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Ibarra. 2006-1571.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Wood App. No. WD-06-037. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. WADDY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Waddy. 2006-1378.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-866, 2006-Ohio-2828. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal not accepted.

BERGHOLTZ COAL v. DUNNING, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Bergholtz Coal Holding Co. v. Dunning. 2006-1535.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Lake App. No. 2004-L-209, 2006-Ohio-3401. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. LANGLEY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Langley. 2006-1657.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Sandusky App. No. S-06-016, 2006-Ohio-3871. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

EX REL. CLEAVER v. SINGER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State ex rel. Cleaver v. Singer. 2006-1750.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

STATE v. CRAIG, 111 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Craig. 2006-1568.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 88313. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

STATE v. FOREMAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1490 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Foreman. 2006-1857.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Summit App. No. 23180. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

CINCINNATI v. DIMASI, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Cincinnati v. Dimasi. 2006-1534.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-060368, 2006-Ohio-3345. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents.

STATE v. SAPPER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Sapper. 2006-1729.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Summit App. No. 22927, 2006-Ohio-2284. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

IN RE BOONE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 In re Boone. 2006-1112.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Hancock App. No. 5-06-15. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion to strike memorandum in response denied as moot.

STATE v. FAIRBANKS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Fairbanks. 2006-1529.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Ross App. No. 05CA2870, 2006-Ohio-3530. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

HINTON v. YMCA OF CENT., 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Hinton v. YMCA of Cent. Stark Cty. 2006-1514.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Stark App. No. 2005CA00251, 2006-Ohio-3278. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

PALMER v. FOLEY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Palmer v. Foley. 2006-1663.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 21235, 2006-Ohio-4013. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

S.E.A., v. DUNNING-LATHROP, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 S.E.A., Inc. v. Dunning-Lathrop Assoc., Inc. 2006-1545.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-769, 2006-Ohio-3447. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

SHEAFFER v. WESTFIELD INS. CO., 111 Ohio St.3d 1495 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Sheaffer v. Westfield Ins. Co. 2005-0078.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Holmes App. No. 03CA006, 2004-Ohio-6755. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 265, 2006-Ohio-4476, 853 N.E.2d 275. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

SHEAFFER v. WESTFIELD, 111 Ohio St.3d 1495 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Sheaffer v. Westfield Ins. Co. 2005-0457.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Holmes App. No. 03CA006, 2004-Ohio-6755. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 265, 2006-Ohio-4476, 853 N.E.2d 275. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. BEAL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1495 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Beal. 2006-1787.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. Nos. 01AP-170, 01AP-171, 01AP-172 and 01AP-173. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

IN RE V.M., 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 In Re V.M. 2006-1905.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 06AP-144, 2006-Ohio-4461. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2006-0503, In re Foster, Cuyahoga App. No. 85716, 2006-Ohio-88. RESNICK and PFEIFEE, JJ., dissent.

CINCINNATI SCL. DIST. v. HAMILTON CTY., 111 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision. 2006-1184.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2005-M-346. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On joint motion to vacate the Board of Tax Appeals’ decision. Motion granted.

STATE v. NEWMAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Newman. 2006-1601.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Summit App. No. 23038, 2006-Ohio-4082. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2006-1245 and 2006-1363, State v. Payne, Franklin App. No. 05AP-517, 2006-Ohio-2552; cause consolidated […]

STATE v. HAMILTON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1490 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Hamilton. 2006-1919.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86520, 2006-Ohio-1949. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

IN RE ADOPTION OF PUSHCAR, 111 Ohio St.3d 1495 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 In re Adoption of Pushcar. 2005-2118.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Lake App. No. 2005-L-050, 2005-Ohio-5114. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 332, 2006-Ohio-4572, 853 N.E.2d 647. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

STATE v. THACKER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Thacker. 2006-1581.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-834, 2006-Ohio-3449. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2006-1245 and 2006-1363, State v. Payne, Franklin App. No. 05AP-517, 2006-Ohio-2552; and briefing schedule stayed.

TRAN v. HASSINGER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Tran v. Hassinger. 2006-1946.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Thanh T. Tran and Henry Tran. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. Page 1489

MRK TECH., v. ACCEL. SYS. INTEG., 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 MRK Technologies, Ltd. v. Accelerated Sys. Integration, Inc. 2006-1696.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87936. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

WEAVER v. MOORE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Weaver v. Moore. 2006-1875.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Dessalines Weaver. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. LANZINGER, J., dissents.

STATE v. CONLEY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Conley. 2006-1935.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 06AP-142. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

STATE v. DILLON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Dillon. 2006-1540.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-679, 2006-Ohio-3312. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE EX REL. CO. v. MABE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State ex rel. Cafaro Mgt. Co. v. Mabe. 2005-1992.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In Mandamus. On request for oral argument. Request denied. RESNICK, J., not participating.

ELLIS v. WOODMERE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Ellis v. Woodmere. 2006-1508.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86881, 167 Ohio App.3d 111, 2006-Ohio-3007. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

WHITE HAT MGT., v. OHIO FARMERS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 White Hat. Mgt., LLC v. Ohio Farmers Ins. Co. 2006-1523.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Medina App. No. 05CA0038-M, 2006-Ohio-3280. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

CHARVAT v. RYAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1490 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Charvat v. Ryan. 2006-1855.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-1331, 2006-Ohio-3705 and 2006-Ohio-4592. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed September 8, 2006: […]

EX REL. WHEELER v. CONNOR, 111 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State ex rel. Wheeler v. Connor. 2006-1800.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion for summary judgment. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

EX REL. KEITH v. SPAETH, 111 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State ex rel. Keith v. Spaeth. 2006-1615.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In Mandamus. On motion for default judgment. Alternative writ granted. The following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X.: The parties shall file any evidence they intend to […]

STATE v. WILLIAMS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1495 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Williams. 2006-1848.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 83707, 2006-Ohio-4269. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

STATE v. JONES, 111 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Jones. 2006-1851.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 05-MA-69, 2006-Ohio-3636. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed September 20, […]

EX REL. JONES v. COLLINS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1495 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State ex rel. Jones v. Collins. 2006-1246.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS In Mandamus. Reported at 111 Ohio St.3d 1404, 2006-Ohio-5083, 854 N.E.2d 1086. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

STATE v. WEST, 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. West. 2006-1512.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Adams App. No. 05CA805, 2006-Ohio-3518. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

LALLY v. AM. ISUZU MOTORS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Lally v. Am. Isuzu Motors. 2006-1520.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-1137, 2006-Ohio-3315. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents. Page 1493

STATE v. CONWAY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Conway. 2003-1964.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin C.P. No. 02CR-3117. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6). Application denied.

STATE v. DAVIS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Davis. 2006-1662.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-538, 2006-Ohio-3707 and 2006-Ohio-4457. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III and hold the cause for the decision in 2006-1245 and 2006-1363 State v. Payne, Franklin App. No. 05AP-517, 2006-Ohio-2552. PFEIFER, […]

STATE v. BRADLEY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Bradley. 2006-1596.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86351, 2006-Ohio-3360. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. KANNER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Kanner. 2006-1536.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Monroe App. No. 04 MO 10, 2006-Ohio-3485. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

KISTLER v. MABE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Kistler v. Mabe. 2006-1532.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. Nos. 04AP-1095 and 04AP-1100, 2006-Ohio-3308. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents.

PROCTOR v. BLANK, 111 Ohio St.3d 1495 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Proctor v. Blank. 2006-1243.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2005-T-0027, 2006-Ohio-2386. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 111 Ohio St.3d 1415, 2006-Ohio-5083, 854 N.E.2d 1093. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and discretionary appeal accepted. Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-1242, Proctor v. Kardassilaris, Trumbull App. No. 2005-T-0026, 2006-Ohio-2385. RESNICK, […]

MELCHER v. RYAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1490 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Melcher v. Ryan. 2006-1916.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Belmont App. No. 05 BE 40, 2006-Ohio-4609. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

STATE v. ELLIOTT, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Elliott. 2006-1542.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Lorain App. Nos. 05CA008686 and 05CA008687, 2006-Ohio-3332. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and III.

STATE v. WHITE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. White. 2006-1713.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-1178, 2006-Ohio-4226. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. HALL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Hall. 2006-1776.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Warren App. No. CA2004-04-045. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

CHARVAT v. RYAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Charvat v. Ryan. 2006-1647.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-1331, 2006-Ohio-3705 and 2006-Ohio-4592. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III and cause consolidated with 2006-1855, Charvat v. Ryan, Franklin App. No. 05AP-1331, 2006-Ohio-3705 and 2006-Ohio-4592. RESNICK, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., would […]

STATE v. WESTFALL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1490 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Westfall. 2006-1932.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Summit App. No. 22048, 2004-Ohio-7172. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. Page 1491

HOWLAND TWP. v. DRAY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Howland Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Dray. 2006-1537.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-O137, 2006-Ohio-3402. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. JONES, 111 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Jones. 2006-1606.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 05-MA-69, 2006-Ohio-3636. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2006-1851, State v. Jones, Mahoning App. No. 05-MA-69, 2006-Ohio-3636. RESNICK and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. HEARD, 111 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Heard. 2006-1933.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Summit App. No. 23025, 2006-Ohio-3558. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

STATE v. PRICE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1490 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Price. 2006-1909.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 06AP-347. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

STATE v. NEWMAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1490 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Newman. 2006-1859.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 21264, 2006-Ohio-4160. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2006-0151, State v. Carswell, Warren App. No. CA2005-04-047, 2005-Ohio-6547; cause consolidated with 2006-1760, […]

STATE v. CAMPBELL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Campbell. 2006-1032.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Warren App. No. CA2005-06-069. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to allow supplemental briefing. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

BUCKNER v. DINKELACKER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Buckner v. Dinkelacker. 2006-1757.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

POSS v. MORRIS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Poss v. Morris. 2006-0934.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Ashtabula App. No. 2004-A-0093, 2006-Ohio-1441. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. PRUITT, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Pruitt. 2006-1653.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 86707 and 86986, 2006-Ohio-4106. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

GOYINGS v. RICKELS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Goyings v. Rickels. 2006-1531.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Paulding App. No. 11-06-03. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. On motion for an order declaring Romane Rickels to be a vexatious litigator. Motion granted, and the court finds Romane Rickels to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(5)(B). Romane Rickels […]

STATE v. FERRATO, 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Ferrato. 2006-1507.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Portage App. No. 2005-P-0070, 167 Ohio App.3d 136, 2006-Ohio-3219. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. NEWMAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Newman. 2006-1793.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Summit App. No. 23038, 2006-Ohio-4082. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2006-1245 and 2006-1363 State v. Payne, Franklin App. No. 05AP-517, Page 1492 2006-Ohio-2552; cause consolidated with 2006-1601, State v. Newman, […]

STATE v. SIMPSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Simpson. 2006-1658.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050798. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. ABBOUD, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Abboud. 2006-1738.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85750, 2006-Ohio-4265. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1495

STATE v. LANDIS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Landis. 2006-1591.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2005-10-428, 2006-Ohio-3538. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

ELERSIC v. BOBBY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Elersic v. Bobby. 2006-1799.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Shane R. Elersic. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

IN RE ESTATE OF PALLAY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 In re Estate of Pallay. 2006-1543.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Washington App. No. 05CA45, 2006-Ohio-3528. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1494

CINCINNATI INS. CO. v. SCHWERHA, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Schwerha. 2006-1538.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Mahoning App. No. 04 MA 257, 2006-Ohio-3521. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

PETERMAN v. STEWART, 111 Ohio St.3d 1490 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Peterman v. Stewart. 2006-1894.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Delaware App. No. 05-CAE-12-0082, 2006-Ohio-4671. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

STATE v. WILLIAMS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1490 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Williams. 2006-1931.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 88406. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., dissents.

VOGT v. EBERLIN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Vogt v. Eberlin. 2006-1797.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Timothy Charles Vogt. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

STATE v. RANSBY, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Ransby. 2006-1679.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86768, 2006-Ohio-3596. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. JACKSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1492 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Jackson. 2006-1068.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2005-02-033, 2006-Ohio-1147. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion to strike memorandum in support of jurisdiction denied as moot.

KRAUSS v. STITT, 111 Ohio St.3d 1493 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Krauss v. Stitt. 2006-1524.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Trumbull App. No. 2005-T-0114, 2006-Ohio-3430. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

WILSON v. MAPLE, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Wilson v. Maple. 2006-1587.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Clermont App. No. CA2005-08-075, 2006-Ohio-3536. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

STATE v. NEWMAN, 111 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Newman. 2006-1760.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 21264, 2006-Ohio-4160. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2006-0151, State v. Carswell, Warren App. No. CA2005-04-047, 2005-Ohio-6547; cause consolidated with 2006-1859, State v. Newman, Montgomery App. No. 21264, 2006-Ohio-4160; and briefing schedule stayed.

MASECK v. LINDAV PROPERTIES, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 Maseck v. Lindav Properties. 2006-1652.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050528, 2006-Ohio-3721. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE v. DAVIS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1489 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Davis. 2006-1675.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-538, 2006-Ohio-3707 and 2006-Ohio-4457. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2006-1245 and 2006-1363, State v. Payne, Franklin App. No. 05AP-517, 2006-Ohio-2552, […]

STATE v. WILSON, 111 Ohio St.3d 1494 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State v. Wilson. 2006-1599.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Coshocton App. No. 02CA30, 2004-Ohio-1857. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

IN RE ADAMS, 111 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 In re Adams. 2006-1695.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 87881. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. On motion for appointment of Christopher Horn as counsel for Lee Adams. Motion granted. RESNICK, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

EX REL. WEAVER v. CAMPBELL, 111 Ohio St.3d 1488 (2006)

2006-Ohio-6171 State ex rel. Weaver v. Campbell. 2006-1746.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 29, 2006. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.