STATE v. JACKSON, 108 Ohio St.3d 1477 (2006)

2006-Ohio-788, 842 N.E.2d 1055 State v. Jackson. 2002-1604.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 23, 2006. Allen C.P. No. CR2002-0011. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel for purposes of filing an application for reopening pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6). Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by […]

Read More

IN RE LoDICO, 108 Ohio St.3d 1477 (2006)

2006-Ohio-788, 842 N.E.2d 1056 In re LoDico. 2006-0141.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 23, 2006. DISCIPLINARY CASES On January 23, 2006, and pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(3), the Secretary of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio certified to the Supreme Court a certified copy of a judgment entry […]

Read More

STATE EX REL. FOSTER v. BELMONT CTY., 108 Ohio St.3d 1477 (2006)

2006-Ohio-788, 842 N.E.2d 1055 State ex rel. Foster v. Belmont Cty. Court of Common Pleas. 2005-0768.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 23, 2006. Belmont App. No. 04-BE-55, 2005-Ohio-1353. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for relief from judgment. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that […]

Read More

STATE v. PEREZ, 108 Ohio St.3d 1477 (2006)

2006-Ohio-788, 842 N.E.2d 1055 State v. Perez. 2005-2364.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 23, 2006. Clark C.P. No. 03CR1010. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas for Clark County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for an extension of time to transmit the record, IT […]

Read More

COLUMBUS BAR ASSN. v. MOESLE, 108 Ohio St.3d 1477 (2006)

2006-Ohio-788, 842 N.E.2d 1056 Columbus Bar Assn. v. Moesle. 2005-0798.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 23, 2006. DISCIPLINARY CASES This cause is before the court upon the filing of respondent’s response to the court’s order to show cause dated January 18, 2006. Upon consideration thereof, It is ordered that respondent must comply with the court’s order […]

Read More