Articles Tagged: 2006-Ohio-962

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 NATL. CITY COMMERCIAL CAPITAL CORP. v. AAAA AT YOUR SERVICE, INC. No. 2006-0169.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2005-08-219. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the […]

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 PAUL DAVIS RESTORATION OF CLEVELAND METRO W. v. KARAMAN. No. 2005-2187.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 84824, 2005-Ohio-4017. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 JAYLIN INVESTMENTS, INC. v. MORELAND HILLS. No. 2004-1145.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 82739, 157 Ohio App.3d 277, 2004-Ohio-2689. Reported at 107 Ohio St.3d 339, 2006-Ohio-4, 839 N.E.2d 903. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. SWANSON. No. 2005-2230.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Ashland App. No. 05 CA 13, 2005-Ohio-5471. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2005-2336, State v. Buehler, Cuyahoga App. No. 85796, 2005-Ohio-5717; and briefing schedule stayed. PFEIFER, J., would accept the appeal but […]

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. HORTON. No. 2005-2398.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Franklin App. No. 03AP-665, 2005-Ohio-458. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and O’CONNOR, J., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 HIGBEE CO. v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION. No. 2004-0052.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2002-T-2552, 2002-T-2569, and 2002-T-2571. Reported at 107 Ohio St.3d 325, 2006-Ohio-2, 839 N.E.2d 385. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. NIPPER. No. 2005-2117.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2005-03-070.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. WILLS. No. 2005-2166.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040612. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STEARNS v. ELAM. No. 2005-2198.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85925, 2005-Ohio-4995. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 RICE v. CUYAHOGA CTY. DEPT. OF JUSTICE. No. 2005-2163.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85576, 2005-Ohio-5337. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. FERRELL. No. 2005-2412.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85821, 2005-Ohio-5992. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 BETTINGER v. BETTINGER. No. 2005-2213.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Summit App. No. 22621, 2005-Ohio-5389. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 S. OHIO GUN DISTRIB., INC. v. CITY AGENCY, INC. No. 2005-2240.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Warren App. No. CA2004-09-116, 2005-Ohio-5366. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. MOYER, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Phillip M. Hudson III by John […]

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 792 STATE v. LEVY. No. 2006-0099.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 83114, 2004-Ohio-4489. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. Page 1486

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. GALYEN. No. 2005-2295.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Clark App. No. 05-CA-111. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 WC MILLING, LLC v. GROOMS. No. 2005-2202.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Adams App. No. 03CA783, 164 Ohio App.3d 45, 2005-Ohio-5420. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. VILARDO. No. 2005-2306.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050812. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. KNOX. No. 2005-2227.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85772, 2005-Ohio-5347. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. YOUNG. No. 2005-2278.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Warren App. No. CA2005-01-006, 2005-Ohio-6162. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 MEDINA v. HAROLD J. BECKER CO., INC. No. 2005-2234.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050041, 163 Ohio App.3d 832, 2005-Ohio-5438. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. On […]

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. JAMES. No. 2005-2244.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hardin App. No. 6-05-02, 2005-Ohio-4445. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. BYRD. No. 2005-2148.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Defiance App. No. 4-05-17, 2005-Ohio-5613. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. BYRD. No. 2005-2160.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Defiance App. No. 4-05-19, 2005-Ohio-5612. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 792 STATE EX REL. WEAVER v. SCHWEIKERT. No. 2006-0031.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. In Procedendo. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 DUNAWAY v. U.S. FINANCIAL LIFE INS. CO. No. 2005-2228.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Clermont App. No. CA2005-02-012, 2005-Ohio-5775. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 MORRISON v. PETRO EVALUATION SERVS., INC. No. 2005-2274.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Morrow App. No. 2004 CA 0004, 2005-Ohio-5640. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 SIMON v. ENCOMPASS INS. CO. No. 2005-2318.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86143, 2005-Ohio-5727. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., not participating.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. KAVANAGH. No. 2005-2149.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. -040767. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. RIPPEY. No. 2006-0101.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Franklin App. No. 04AP-960, 2005-Ohio-2639. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 HUTCHINS v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYS. No. 2006-0219.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Summit App. No. 22551, 2005-Ohio-6738. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. Page 1487

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. TRENT. No. 2005-2316.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Stark App. No. 2004CA00360, 2005-Ohio-5793. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 SMITH v. JEWETT. No. 2005-2207.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Richland App. No. 04 CA 96, 2005-Ohio-3982. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 MUEHRCKE v. HOUSEL. No. 2005-2296.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 85643 and 85644, 2005-Ohio-5440. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. BORDNER. No. 2005-1724.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Wayne App. No. 04CA0039, 2005-Ohio-1269. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 ZAVACKY v. A-BEST PROD. CO., INC. No. 2005-2146.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85833. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. RESNICK, J., dissents. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Jason T. Shipp by John J. Duffy. Motion granted.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. WARD. No. 2005-2245.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Henry App. No. 7-05-07. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 POPP v. INTEGRATED ELECTRICAL SERVS., INC. No. 2005-2214.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Butler App. No. CA2005-03-058, 2005-Ohio-5367. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and RESNICK, J., dissent.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 WHITESIDE v. CONROY. No. 2005-2172.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-123, 2005-Ohio-5098. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. RICHEIMER. No. 2005-2180.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Delaware App. No. 05CAA080060. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1488

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 BEHESHTAEIN v. AM. STATES INS. CO. No. 2005-2371.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 20839, 2005-Ohio-5907. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and O’CONNOR, JJ., not participating.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 ROETENBERGER v. CHRIST HOSP. No. 2005-2151.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040009, 163 Ohio App.3d 555, 2005-Ohio-5205. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 SCHULER v. SCHULER. No. 2005-2252.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Union App. No. 14-05-04, 2005-Ohio-5466. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. HARRIS. No. 2005-2237.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85544, 2005-Ohio-5195. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. ROBINSON. No. 2005-2233.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85207, 2005-Ohio-5132. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. HENLEY. No. 2005-2294.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Montgomery App. No. 20789, 2005-Ohio-6142. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 AKRON GROUP SERVS., INC. v. PATRON PLASTICS, INC. No. 2005-2150.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Summit App. No. 22507, 2005-Ohio-5101. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 792 STATE v. SEAY. No. 2006-0125.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040763, 2005-Ohio-5964. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. SCHEIDEL. No. 2006-0211.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Ashtabula App. No. 2003-A-0087, 2006-Ohio-195. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 792 KINGDOM LIFE MINISTRIES, INC. v. PLESSINGER. No. 2006-0138.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050216. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. COLEMAN. No. 2005-2288.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Lorain App. No. 05CA008810. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 792 STATE EX REL. KLEIN v. DOAN. No. 2006-0081.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. In Mandamus and Procedendo. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. VILLA-GARCIA. No. 2005-2224.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-997. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. ESTES. No. 2005-2231.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Preble App. No. CA2005-02-001, 2005-Ohio-5478. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. McCAULEY. No. 2006-0009.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 81328, 2005-Ohio-6093. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. BROWN. No. 2005-2175.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Delaware App. No. 2005CAA01002, 2005-Ohio-5639. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. BYRD. No. 2005-2344.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85868, 2005-Ohio-5558. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. Page 1490

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. BOYLE. No. 2005-2226.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Portage App. Nos. 2004-P-0099, 2004-P-0100, and 2004-P-0101, 2005-Ohio-5493. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and IV.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 C.J. MAHAN CONSTR. CO. v. MOHAWK RE-BAR SERVS., INC. No. 2005-2241.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Stark App. No. 2004CA00387, 2005-Ohio-5427. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 792 STATE v. LAMARR. No. 2006-0111.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Logan App. No. 8-04-39, 2005-Ohio-6030. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 LOFINO v. BERKEMEIER. No. 2006-0204.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Greene App. No. 2005-CA-33, 2005-Ohio-6676. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. YATES. No. 2006-0098.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Summit App. No. 21790, 2005-Ohio-4094. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. ROGERS. No. 2005-2191.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Huron App. Nos. H-04-030 and H-04-042, 2005-Ohio-5358. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. LONG. No. 2005-2246.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-040643. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion for stay of the jurisdictional question pending outcome of appellant’s application for reopening denied as moot. O’CONNOR, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. LAZZARO. No. 2005-2225.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 84956, 2005-Ohio-4118. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. HALL. No. 2006-0161.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Clark App. No. 05CA0006, 2005-Ohio-6672. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 792 STATE v. TANNER. No. 2006-0127.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Medina App. No. 04CA0062-M, 2005-Ohio-998. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal and motion to strike memorandum opposing motion for delayed appeal. Motions denied.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 AM. CHURCH BUILDERS v. CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP CTR. No. 2005-2389.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Franklin App. No. 05AP-219, 2005-Ohio-6056. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. THOMAS. No. 2006-0191.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Hamilton App. No. C-050245, 2005-Ohio-6823. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay pending lower court decision. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 LANDSKRONER v. LANDSKRONER. No. 2005-2184.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 85060, 2005-Ohio-4582. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795 STATE v. STILLMAN. No. 2005-2291.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Fairfield App. No. 2005-CA-55, 2005-Ohio-6299. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 WRIGHT v. PEYTON. No. 2005-2219.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Perry App. No. 04CA17, 2005-Ohio-5468. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 792 STATE v. DAVIS. No. 2006-0143.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 86987. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 792 IN RE T.K. No. 2005-1215.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Cuyahoga App. No. 84934, 2005-Ohio-2321. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for review of placement to determine appropriateness of placement and release from custody of Ohio Department of Youth Services. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 792 STATE v. CLARK. No. 1987-0327.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Lucas App. No. L-84-443. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to set execution date. Motion granted. Execution to be carried out on Tuesday, May 2, 2006.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 SWANK v. ESTATE OF SWANK. No. 2005-2256.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Richland App. Nos. 2004CA0110, 2004CA0111 and 2004CA0112, 2005-Ohio-5524. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 STATE v. BYRD. No. 2005-2161.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Defiance App. No. 4-05-18, 2005-Ohio-5613. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 792 STATE v. HOLDER. No. 2006-0150.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Huron App. No. H-00-006, 2002-Ohio-399. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 794 STATE v. CASTLE. No. 2005-2232.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Franklin App. Nos. 05AP-105 and 05AP-106, 2005-Ohio-5423. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 793 IN RE ESTATE OF HOLYCROSS. No. 2005-2281.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 8, 2006. Champaign App. No. 2005 CA 1, 2005-Ohio-5582. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.