2007-Ohio-5056 Hitch v. Thomas. No. 2007-1062.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lucas App. No. L-07-1140. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal accepted; motion to dismiss denied; cause held for the decision in 2006-1263, Manley v. Marisco, Clinton App. No. CA2006-04-013; and briefing schedule stayed. MOYER, C.J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law […]
Articles Tagged: 2007-Ohio-5056
STATE v. BIESER, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Bieser. No. 2007-0923.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Licking App. No. 06CA00045, 2007-Ohio-1960. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. MUNDT, 2005-0192 (10-3-2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Mundt, 2007-Ohio-4836. No. 2005-0192.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Noble C.P. No. CRI 204-2002CR. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.
STATE v. FOSTER, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Foster. No. 2007-1583.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-060720. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. O’CONNOR, J., dissents.
STATE v. ROLLINS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Rollins. No. 2007-1032.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Paulding App. No. 11-06-09, 2007-Ohio-1910. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. CUPP, J., not participating.
STATE v. PRUITT, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Pruitt. No. 2007-1116.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 06AP-1184, 2007-Ohio-2331. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. MASTICE, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Mastice. No. 2007-1642.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Wayne App. No. 06CA0050, 2007-Ohio-4107. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
TERRY v. CAPUTO, 2006-0705 (10-3-2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Terry v. Caputo, 2007-Ohio-5023. No. 2006-0705.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Ottawa App. No. OT-05-009, 165 Ohio App.3d 638, 2006-Ohio-866. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part. Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.
STATE v. FILCHOCK, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Filchock. No. 2007-1126.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lake App. No. 2006-L-122, 2007-Ohio-2574. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. HORN, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Horn. No. 2007-1118.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 89833. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. BRADY, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Brady. No. 2007-1088.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 87854, 2007-Ohio-1453. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. MADARIS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Madaris. No. 2007-1061.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-070329. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. LIDDLE, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Liddle. No. 2007-0994.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Summit App. No. 23287, 2007-Ohio-1820. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III.
STATE v. WITHERS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Withers. No. 2007-0632.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. Nos. 06AP-302 and 06AP-303, 2006-Ohio-6989. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. ROBERTS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1424 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Roberts. No. 2007-1524.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-050279, 2007-Ohio-856. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill and hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0325, State v. Davis, Hamilton App. No. C-040665, 2006-Ohio-3171.
STATE v. MORRIS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Morris. No. 2007-1187.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 05AP-1032, 2007-Ohio-2382. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III.
STATE v. SMITH, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Smith. No. 2007-1060.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-060524. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. CRAIG, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Craig. No. 2007-1135.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88039, 2007-Ohio-1834. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
WURZAUF v. HONDA OF AM. MFG., 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Wurzauf v. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc. No. 2007-1029.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Union App. No. 14-06-31, 2007-Ohio-1913. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. CUPP, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2006-0617, Bickers v. W.S. Life Ins. Co., Inc., Hamilton […]
STATE v. FREEMAN, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Freeman. No. 2007-1534.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0055, 2006-Ohio-492. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent. O’CONNOR, J., not participating.
STATE v. ROBERTS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Roberts. No. 2007-1567.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-050279, 2007-Ohio-856. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. HENDERSON, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Henderson. No. 2007-1070.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lake App. No. 2006-L-110, 2007-Ohio-2315. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
TYUS v. GRAND POINTE HEALTH COMMUNITY, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Tyus v. Grand Pointe Health Community. No. 2007-0796.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88763. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. O’CONNOR and CUPP, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
STATE v. BYRD, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Byrd. No. 2007-1122.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-060470. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II.
STATE v. PORTERFIELD, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Porterfield. No. 2007-1016.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Trumbull App. No. 2007-T-0016, 2007-Ohio-2053. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. SMITH, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Smith. No. 2007-0993.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Ross App. No. 06CA2893, 2007-Ohio-1884. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
SILVER v. SILVER, 115 Ohio St.3d 1424 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Silver v. Silver. No. 2007-1206.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Clark App. No. 2006 CA 47, 2007-Ohio-2606. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. BROWN, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Brown. No. 2007-1009.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Montgomery App. No. 21540, 2007-Ohio-2098. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. THOMAS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Thomas. No. 2007-1048.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-060355. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
JONOVICH v. E. CLEVELAND, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Jonovich v. E. Cleveland. No. 2007-1112.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88272, 2007-Ohio-1984. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. MOYER, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent. Page 1423
KLEIN v. MOUTZ, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Klein v. Moutz. No. 2007-1551.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Summit App. No. 23473, 2007-Ohio-3242. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed August […]
STATE v. KEMP, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Kemp. No. 2007-1091.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 06AP-824, 2007-Ohio-2219. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. PINKNEY, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Pinkney. No. 2007-0976.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88357, 2007-Ohio-1721. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2007-1254, State v. Silsby, Geauga App. No. 2006-G-2725, 2007-Ohio-2308.
LANEVE v. ATLAS RECYCLING, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 LaNeve v. Atlas Recycling, Inc. No. 2007-1199.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Trumbull App. No. 2006-T-0032, 2007-Ohio-2856. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeals accepted and cause consolidated with 2007-1372 and 2007-1373, LaNeve v. Atlas Recycling, Inc., Trumbull App. No. 2006-T-0032, 2007-Ohio-2856. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. REID, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Reid. No. 2007-1137.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Montgomery App. Nos. 21499 and 21573, 2007-Ohio-2427. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
DISCIPLINARY v. PARKER, 115 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Disciplinary Counsel v. Parker. No. 2007-1157.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 05-091. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion to strike brief of amicus curiae William Scherpenberg, Mason Municipal Court Clerk. Motion granted. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. BROWN, 2005-0749 (10-3-2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Brown, 2007-Ohio-4837. No. 2005-0749.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR 447563. Judgment vacated and cause remanded.
STATE v. LATHER, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Lather. No. 2007-1189.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Sandusky App. No. S-03-00, 2007-Ohio-2399. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. WILLIAMS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Williams. No. 2007-1531.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-050696. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS.
STATE v. BRESSLER, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Bressler. No. 2007-1589.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Van Wert App. No. 15-06-15. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent. CUPP, J., not participating.
STATE v. ADAMES, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Adames. No. 2007-1142.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88565, 2007-Ohio-2233. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. CUPP, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I and hold the cause for the decision in 2007-1254 State v. Silsby, Geauga App. No. 2006-G-2725, 2007-Ohio-2308.
STATE v. MOORER, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Moorer. No. 2007-1031.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-060358. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. YOUNG, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Young. No. 2007-1017.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 89715. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
SINGLETON v. OHIO CONCRETE RESURFACING, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Singleton v. Ohio Concrete Resurfacing, Inc. No. 2007-1049.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 06AP-991, 2007-Ohio-2012. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent. Page 1422
STATE v. DEER, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Deer. No. 2007-0986.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lucas App. No. L-06-1086, 2007-Ohio-1866. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
MAAS v. PENN CENT. CORP, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Maas v. Penn Cent. Corp. No. 2007-1064.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Trumbull App. No. 2006-T-0067, 2007-Ohio-2055. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. O’DONNELL, J., not participating.
STATE v. SILVEY, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Silvey. No. 2007-1146.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lucas App. No. L-05-1254, 2007-Ohio-2535. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
SIGMON v. SOUTHWEST GEN. HEALTH CTR, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Sigmon v. Southwest Gen. Health Ctr. No. 2007-1036.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88276, 2007-Ohio-2117. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. PFEIFER, J., dissents. O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. IV.
NATIONWIDE LIFE INS. v. KALLBERG, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Nationwide Life Ins. Co. v. Kallberg. No. 2007-1055.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lorain App. No. 06CA008968, 2007-Ohio-2041. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. PORTERFIELD, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Porterfield. No. 2007-1013.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Trumbull App. No. 2007-T-0017, 2007-Ohio-2054. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE EX REL. SPOHN v. INDUS. COMM., 2005-1358 (10-3-2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State ex rel. Spohn v. Indus. Comm., 2007-Ohio-5027. No. 2005-1358.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Franklin App. No. 04AP-626, 2005-Ohio-2800. Judgment affirmed. Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.
RITT v. BILLY BLANKS ENTS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Ritt v. Billy Blanks Ents. No. 2007-1037.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 88012 and 88034, 171 Ohio App.3d 204, 2007-Ohio-1695. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal not accepted. MOYER, C.J., dissents. O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Motions for admission pro […]
LOVE PROPERTIES, INC. v. KYLES, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Love Properties, Inc. v. Kyles. No. 2007-1034.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Stark App. No. 2006 CA 00101, 2007-Ohio-1966. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. GLOSSIP, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Glossip. No. 2007-1067.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Warren App. No. CA2006-04-040, 2007-Ohio-2066 APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
LANEVE v. ATLAS RECYCLING, 115 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 LaNeve v. Atlas Recycling, Inc. Nos. 2007-1372 and 2007-1373.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Trumbull App. No. 2006-T-0032, 2007-Ohio-2856. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On review of orders certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 5 of the court of appeals’ […]
STATE v. WORRELL, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Worrell. No. 2007-1084.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 06AP-706. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
VIL LASER v. SHILOH IND., 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 VIL Laser Sys., LLC v. Shiloh Industries, Inc. No. 2007-0996.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Shelby App. No. 17-07-02. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I. PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, and LANZINGER, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, […]
STONEMAN v. TURNER METAL PRODS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Stoneman v. Turner Metal Prods. No. 2007-1197.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88206, 2007-Ohio-1719. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal not accepted. PFEIFER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2006-1647 and 2006-1855, Charvat v. Ryan, Franklin App. No. 05AP-1331, 2006-Ohio-3705 […]
KAPSZUKIEWICZ v. LEASOR, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Kapszukiewicz v. Leasor. No. 2007-1004.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lucas App. No. L-06-1200, 2007-Ohio-1871. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III. PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. IV.
HUGHES v. FED. MOGUL IGNITION, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Hughes v. Fed. Mogul Ignition Co. No. 2007-1051.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Guernsey App. No. 06 CA 27, 2007-Ohio-2021. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. AQUINO, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Aquino. No. 2007-1133.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 89767. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
HAMILTON v. ROUDEBUSH, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Bd. of Commrs. of Hamilton Cty v. Roudebush. No. 2007-1141.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-050872. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. BATTLE, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Battle. No. 2007-0991.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 06AP-863, 2007-Ohio-1845. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Page 1421
STATE v. JOHNSON, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Johnson. No. 2007-1174.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 06AP-67, 2007-Ohio-2385. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. PERRY., 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Perry. No. 2007-1065.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Trumbull App. No. 2006-T-0078, 2007-Ohio-2050. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
WILSON v. UNITED FELLOWSHIP CLUB, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Wilson v. United Fellowship Club of Barberton. No. 2007-1077.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Summit App. No. 23241, 2007-Ohio-2089. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. CURTIS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Curtis. No. 2007-1202.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 06AP-791, 2007-Ohio-2593. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Page 1424
RUSSELL v. JACKSON, 115 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Russell v. Jackson. No. 2007-1602.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS. In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Mark R. Russell. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
DANN v. MAURER MOBILE HOME, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State ex rel. Dann v. Maurer Mobile Home Court, Inc. No. 2007-1105.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Wood App. No. WD-06-053, 2007-Ohio-2262. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. PIKE TWP, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State ex rel. Republic Servs. of Ohio II, LLC v. Bd. of Trustees of Pike Twp. No. 2007-1066.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Stark App. Nos. 2006 CA 00153 and 2006 CA 00172, 2007-Ohio-2086. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. ADAMS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Adams. No. 2007-1128.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lake App. No. 2006-L-114, 2007-Ohio-2434. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. CUPP, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
STATE v. REYNOLDS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Reynolds. No. 2007-1063.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 06AP-1006, 2007-Ohio-2189 APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. WATSON, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Watson. No. 2007-1078.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-070322. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
BLACKBURN v. CITIFINANCIAL, INC., 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Blackburn v. Citifinancial, Inc. No. 2007-0905.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 05AP-733, 2007-Ohio-1463. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal not accepted. O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the appeal.
STATE v. MUNGAI, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Mungai. No. 2007-1540.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 89735. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. BELL, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Bell. No. 2007-0987.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Madison App. No. CA2007-03-009. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
SHELLY MATERIALS, INC. v. CLARK CTY. BD., 2006-0165 (10-3-2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State ex rel. Shelly Materials, Inc. v. Clark Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2007-Ohio-5022. No. 2006-0165.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Clark App. No. 2003-CA-72, 2005-Ohio-6682. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., concurs in judgment only. Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. DAVIS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Davis. No. 2007-1039.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Highland App. No. 06CA26, 2007-Ohio-2249. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. PPEIPER, J., dissents.
STATE v. MARINO, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Marino. No. 2007-1127.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lake App. No. 2006-L-192, 2007-Ohio-2566. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. DOWNARD, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Downard. No. 2007-1075.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Wood App. No. WD-05-086, 2007-Ohio-2144. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. COBB, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Cobb. No. 2007-0989.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Scioto App. No. 06CA3076, 2007-Ohio-1885. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. TRAVIS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Travis. No. 2007-1131.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88636, 2007-Ohio-2379. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I and hold the cause for the decision in 2006-0882, State v. Geeslin, Mercer App. No. 10-05-06, 2006-Ohio-1261.
STATE v. KELLY, 115 Ohio St.3d 1424 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Kelly. No. 2007-1218.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 06AP-606. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
SIMEONE v. GIRARD CITY BD. OF EDN, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Simeone v. Girard City Bd. of Edn. No. 2007-0981.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Trumbull App. No. 2006-T-0056, 2007-Ohio-1775. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
ESTATE OF POOLE v. CONWELL, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Estate of Poole v. Conwell. No. 2007-1071.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88414, 2007-Ohio-2510, 2007-Ohio-2315. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. PRICE, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Price. No. 2007-1106.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Clermont App. Nos. CA2006-07-052 and CA2006-08-057. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. HILL, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Hill. No. 2007-1019.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. Nos. C-060425 and C-060426. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. BLAKELY, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Blakely. No. 2007-1074.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-070323. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. SWANN, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Swann. No. 2007-1046.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. Nos. 06AP-870 and 06AP-899, 171 Ohio App.3d 304, 2007-Ohio-2010. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. PFEIFER and CUPP, […]
DAVID P. v. KIM D, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 David P. v. Kim D. No. 2007-0886.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lucas App. No. L-06-1164, 2007-Ohio-1865. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
DEUTSCHE BANK v. DOUCET, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5056 Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Doucet. No. 2007-1669.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 07AP-453. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for stay of trial court judgment of foreclosure. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., dissents and would grant the motion conditioned upon a $160,000 bond.