HITCH v. THOMAS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 Hitch v. Thomas. No. 2007-1062.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lucas App. No. L-07-1140. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal accepted; motion to dismiss denied; cause held for the decision in 2006-1263, Manley v. Marisco, Clinton App. No. CA2006-04-013; and briefing schedule stayed. MOYER, C.J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law […]

Read More

STATE v. MUNDT, 2005-0192 (10-3-2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Mundt, 2007-Ohio-4836. No. 2005-0192.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Noble C.P. No. CRI 204-2002CR. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Read More

STATE v. FOSTER, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Foster. No. 2007-1583.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-060720. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. O’CONNOR, J., dissents.

Read More

STATE v. MASTICE, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Mastice. No. 2007-1642.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Wayne App. No. 06CA0050, 2007-Ohio-4107. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

Read More

TERRY v. CAPUTO, 2006-0705 (10-3-2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 Terry v. Caputo, 2007-Ohio-5023. No. 2006-0705.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Ottawa App. No. OT-05-009, 165 Ohio App.3d 638, 2006-Ohio-866. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part. Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Read More

STATE v. LIDDLE, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Liddle. No. 2007-0994.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Summit App. No. 23287, 2007-Ohio-1820. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III.

Read More

STATE v. ROBERTS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1424 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Roberts. No. 2007-1524.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-050279, 2007-Ohio-856. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill and hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0325, State v. Davis, Hamilton App. No. C-040665, 2006-Ohio-3171.

Read More

STATE v. MORRIS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Morris. No. 2007-1187.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 05AP-1032, 2007-Ohio-2382. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III.

Read More

WURZAUF v. HONDA OF AM. MFG., 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 Wurzauf v. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc. No. 2007-1029.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Union App. No. 14-06-31, 2007-Ohio-1913. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. CUPP, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2006-0617, Bickers v. W.S. Life Ins. Co., Inc., Hamilton […]

Read More

STATE v. FREEMAN, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Freeman. No. 2007-1534.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0055, 2006-Ohio-492. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent. O’CONNOR, J., not participating.

Read More

STATE v. ROBERTS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Roberts. No. 2007-1567.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-050279, 2007-Ohio-856. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

Read More

STATE v. BYRD, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Byrd. No. 2007-1122.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Hamilton App. No. C-060470. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II.

Read More

KLEIN v. MOUTZ, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 Klein v. Moutz. No. 2007-1551.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Summit App. No. 23473, 2007-Ohio-3242. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed August […]

Read More

STATE v. PINKNEY, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Pinkney. No. 2007-0976.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88357, 2007-Ohio-1721. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2007-1254, State v. Silsby, Geauga App. No. 2006-G-2725, 2007-Ohio-2308.

Read More

LANEVE v. ATLAS RECYCLING, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 LaNeve v. Atlas Recycling, Inc. No. 2007-1199.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Trumbull App. No. 2006-T-0032, 2007-Ohio-2856. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeals accepted and cause consolidated with 2007-1372 and 2007-1373, LaNeve v. Atlas Recycling, Inc., Trumbull App. No. 2006-T-0032, 2007-Ohio-2856. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

Read More

DISCIPLINARY v. PARKER, 115 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 Disciplinary Counsel v. Parker. No. 2007-1157.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 05-091. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion to strike brief of amicus curiae William Scherpenberg, Mason Municipal Court Clerk. Motion granted. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

Read More

STATE v. BROWN, 2005-0749 (10-3-2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Brown, 2007-Ohio-4837. No. 2005-0749.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR 447563. Judgment vacated and cause remanded.

Read More

STATE v. BRESSLER, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Bressler. No. 2007-1589.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Van Wert App. No. 15-06-15. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent. CUPP, J., not participating.

Read More

STATE v. ADAMES, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Adames. No. 2007-1142.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88565, 2007-Ohio-2233. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. CUPP, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I and hold the cause for the decision in 2007-1254 State v. Silsby, Geauga App. No. 2006-G-2725, 2007-Ohio-2308.

Read More

STATE EX REL. SPOHN v. INDUS. COMM., 2005-1358 (10-3-2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State ex rel. Spohn v. Indus. Comm., 2007-Ohio-5027. No. 2005-1358.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Franklin App. No. 04AP-626, 2005-Ohio-2800. Judgment affirmed. Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Read More

RITT v. BILLY BLANKS ENTS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 Ritt v. Billy Blanks Ents. No. 2007-1037.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 88012 and 88034, 171 Ohio App.3d 204, 2007-Ohio-1695. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal not accepted. MOYER, C.J., dissents. O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Motions for admission pro […]

Read More

LANEVE v. ATLAS RECYCLING, 115 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 LaNeve v. Atlas Recycling, Inc. Nos. 2007-1372 and 2007-1373.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Trumbull App. No. 2006-T-0032, 2007-Ohio-2856. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On review of orders certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 5 of the court of appeals’ […]

Read More

VIL LASER v. SHILOH IND., 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 VIL Laser Sys., LLC v. Shiloh Industries, Inc. No. 2007-0996.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Shelby App. No. 17-07-02. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I. PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, and LANZINGER, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, […]

Read More

STONEMAN v. TURNER METAL PRODS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 Stoneman v. Turner Metal Prods. No. 2007-1197.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88206, 2007-Ohio-1719. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal not accepted. PFEIFER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2006-1647 and 2006-1855, Charvat v. Ryan, Franklin App. No. 05AP-1331, 2006-Ohio-3705 […]

Read More

KAPSZUKIEWICZ v. LEASOR, 115 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 Kapszukiewicz v. Leasor. No. 2007-1004.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lucas App. No. L-06-1200, 2007-Ohio-1871. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III. PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. IV.

Read More

RUSSELL v. JACKSON, 115 Ohio St.3d 1418 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 Russell v. Jackson. No. 2007-1602.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS. In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Mark R. Russell. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

Read More

STATE v. PIKE TWP, 115 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State ex rel. Republic Servs. of Ohio II, LLC v. Bd. of Trustees of Pike Twp. No. 2007-1066.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Stark App. Nos. 2006 CA 00153 and 2006 CA 00172, 2007-Ohio-2086. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.

Read More

STATE v. ADAMS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Adams. No. 2007-1128.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Lake App. No. 2006-L-114, 2007-Ohio-2434. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. CUPP, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

Read More

STATE v. MUNGAI, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Mungai. No. 2007-1540.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 89735. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., dissent.

Read More

SHELLY MATERIALS, INC. v. CLARK CTY. BD., 2006-0165 (10-3-2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State ex rel. Shelly Materials, Inc. v. Clark Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2007-Ohio-5022. No. 2006-0165.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Clark App. No. 2003-CA-72, 2005-Ohio-6682. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. O’Donnell, J., concurs in judgment only. Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Read More

STATE v. TRAVIS, 115 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Travis. No. 2007-1131.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Cuyahoga App. No. 88636, 2007-Ohio-2379. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I and hold the cause for the decision in 2006-0882, State v. Geeslin, Mercer App. No. 10-05-06, 2006-Ohio-1261.

Read More

STATE v. SWANN, 115 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 State v. Swann. No. 2007-1046.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. Nos. 06AP-870 and 06AP-899, 171 Ohio App.3d 304, 2007-Ohio-2010. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. PFEIFER and CUPP, […]

Read More

DEUTSCHE BANK v. DOUCET, 115 Ohio St.3d 1419 (2007)

2007-Ohio-5056 Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Doucet. No. 2007-1669.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 3, 2007. Franklin App. No. 07AP-453. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for stay of trial court judgment of foreclosure. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., dissents and would grant the motion conditioned upon a $160,000 bond.

Read More