2008-Ohio-2889 In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education. Matthew Alfred Smith (# 0078661), Respondent. No. CLE-2007-78661.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 16, 2008. MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS ENTRY This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and […]
Articles Tagged: 2008-Ohio-2889
IN RE REPORT ON WILLIAMS, 118 Ohio St.3d 1457 (2008)
2008-Ohio-2889 In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education. Nathan Samuel Williams, (# 0079987), Respondent. No. CLE-2007-79987.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 16, 2008. CORRECTED ORDER This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and (A)(2)(d). […]
IN RE REPORT ON POLKE, 118 Ohio St.3d 1447 (2008)
2008-Ohio-2889 In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education. Dennis Jerome Polke (# 0030896), Respondent. No. CLE-2007-30896.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 16, 2008. MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS ENTRY This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and […]
LIAS v. BEEKMAN, 118 Ohio St.3d 1446 (2008)
2008-Ohio-2889 Lias v. Beekman. No. 2007-2394.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 16, 2008. Franklin App. No. 06AP-1134, 2007-Ohio-5737. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for new hearings. It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
IN RE REPORT ON FORRISTAL, 118 Ohio St.3d 1452 (2008)
2008-Ohio-2889 In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education John Thomas Forristal (# 0078941), Respondent. No. CLE-2007-78941.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 16, 2008. MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS ENTRY This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and […]
STATE v. WOLF, 118 Ohio St.3d 1446 (2008)
2008-Ohio-2889 State v. Wolf. No. 2008-0960.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 16, 2008. Union App. No. 14-06-54, 2008-Ohio-1483. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion for appeal bond, It is ordered by the court that the motion is […]