SMITH v. AKRON, 119 Ohio St.3d 1427 (2008)

2008-Ohio-4252 State ex rel. Smith v. Akron. No. 2008-1538.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 22, 2008. In Mandamus. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal, It is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is […]

Read More

STATE v. SMITH, 119 Ohio St.3d 1427 (2008)

2008-Ohio-4252 State v. Smith. No. 2008-1308.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 22, 2008. Hamilton App. No. C-070216, 2008-Ohio-2469. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to strike the notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction, It is ordered by the court […]

Read More

CINCINNATI ENQUIRER v. HEATH., 119 Ohio St.3d 1427 (2008)

2008-Ohio-4252 State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Heath. No. 2008-1250.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 22, 2008. Warren App. No. CA2008-03-046. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Prac. R. XIV(6)(E): Page 1428

Read More

CEPEDA v. LUTHERAN HOSP., 119 Ohio St.3d 1427 (2008)

2008-Ohio-4252 CEPEDA v. LUTHERAN HOSP. No. 2008-1350.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 22, 2008. Cuyahoga App. No. 90031, 2008-Ohio-2348. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to strike the appeal, It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied. It is […]

Read More

SOGG v. DEPT. OF COMMERCE, 119 Ohio St.3d 1427 (2008)

2008-Ohio-4252 Sogg v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce. No. 2007-1452.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 22, 2008. Franklin App. No. 06AP-883, 2007-Ohio-3219. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for admission pro hac vice of Glen Hara, […]

Read More