2009-Ohio-4776 State ex rel. Clutter v. Wiseman. No. 2009-1240.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 16, 2009. In Mandamus and Procedendo. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
Articles Tagged: 2009-Ohio-4776
STATE v. DOWNOUR, 122 Ohio St.3d 1520 (2009)
2009-Ohio-4776 State v. Downour. No. 2009-0886.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 16, 2009. Lucas App. No. L-08-1029, 2009-Ohio-1812. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. PFEIFER, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., dissent.
FIA CARD SERVS. v. YOUNG, 122 Ohio St.3d 1523 (2009)
2009-Ohio-4776 FIA Card Servs., N.A. v. Young. No. 2009-1053.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 16, 2009. Knox App. No. 08 CA 22, 2009-Ohio-2008. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motions for stay and post-judgment relief and to strike memorandum in response denied as moot.
STATE v. HINES, 122 Ohio St.3d 1520 2009-1326 (9-16-2009)
2009-Ohio-4776 State v. Hines. No. 2009-1326.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 16, 2009. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS Cuyahoga App. No. 90871, 2009-Ohio-2118. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. HARTMAN, 122 Ohio St.3d 1520 (2009)
2009-Ohio-4776 State v. Hartman. No. 2009-0840.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 16, 2009. Cuyahoga App. No. 91040, 2009-Ohio-1069. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.
STATE v. BISHOP, 122 Ohio St.3d 1523 (2009)
2009-Ohio-4776 State v. Bishop. No. 2009-0985.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 16, 2009. Cuyahoga App. No. 91885, 2009-Ohio-1797. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
STATE v. CARMEN, 122 Ohio St.3d 1520 (2009)
2009-Ohio-4776 State v. Carmen. No. 2009-1349.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 16, 2009. Clinton App. No. CA2007-06-030, 2008-Ohio-5842. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
DARROW v. ZIGAN, 122 Ohio St.3d 1524 (2009)
2009-Ohio-4776 Darrow v. Zigan. No. 2009-1073.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 16, 2009. Hocking App. No. 07CA25, 2009-Ohio-2205. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.
STATE v. JOHNS, 122 Ohio St.3d 1524 (2009)
2009-Ohio-4776 State v. Johns. No. 2009-1161.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 16, 2009. Stark App. No. 2006CA00368. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
KNOX v. HETRICK, 122 Ohio St.3d 1522 (2009)
2009-Ohio-4776 Knox v. Hetrick. No. 2009-0850.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 16, 2009. Cuyahoga App. No. 91102, 2009-Ohio-1359. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal not accepted. Motion to strike denied as moot. MOYER, C.J., would accept the cross-appeal.
STATE v. BECKWITH, 122 Ohio St.3d 1522 (2009)
2009-Ohio-4776 State v. Beckwith. No. 2009-0855.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 16, 2009. Cuyahoga App. No. 91399, 2009-Ohio-1244. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
RIEDEL v. CONSOL. RAIL CORP., 122 Ohio St.3d 1521 (2009)
2009-Ohio-4776 Riedel v. Consol. Rail Corp. No. 2009-1070.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 16, 2009. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 91237, 91238, and 91239, 2009-Ohio-1242. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Discretionary appeal accepted. PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. Motions for admission pro hac vice of Michael L. Torcello by Christopher M. Murphy and of Ira L. Podheiser by […]