2010-Ohio-2059 In re Application of Ziegler. No. 2010-0366.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 12, 2010. Miscellaneous Orders. On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. I(12)(E), recommending that Philip Alonzo Ziegler’s application for admission to the Ohio bar be disapproved because […]
Articles Tagged: 2010-Ohio-2059
IN RE KARNOFEL, 125 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2010)
2010-Ohio-2059, 2010-Ohio-1623 In re Karnofel. Supreme Court of Ohio. May 12, 2010. Motion and Procedural Rulings. On February 10, 2010, this court found Delores M. Karnofel to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct. Prac. R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Karnofel was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first […]
IN RE APPLICATION OF CIEPIEL, 125 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2010)
2010-Ohio-2059 In re Application of Ciepiel. No. 2010-0361.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 12, 2010. Miscellaneous Orders. On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. I(12)(E), recommending that Mark Joseph Ciepiel’s application for admission to the Ohio bar be disapproved because […]
IN RE APPLICATION OF CARCIONE, 125 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2010)
2010-Ohio-2059 In re Application of Carcione. No. 2010-0360.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 12, 2010. Miscellaneous Orders. On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. I(12)(E), recommending that Collette Jeannine Carcione’s application for admission to the Ohio bar be disapproved because […]
IN RE APPLICATION OF PITEO, 125 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2010)
2010-Ohio-2059 In re Application of Piteo. No. 2010-0354.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 12, 2010. Miscellaneous Orders. On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. I(12)(E), recommending that Theodore James Piteo’s application for admission to the Ohio bar be disapproved because […]
IN RE APPLICATION OF DEBORD, 125 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2010)
2010-Ohio-2059 In re Application of DeBord. No. 2010-0363.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 12, 2010. Miscellaneous Orders. On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. I(12)(E), recommending that Andrew Evans DeBord’s application for admission to the Ohio bar be disapproved because […]
IN RE APPLICATION OF BINAUT, 125 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2010)
2010-Ohio-2059 In re Application of Binaut. No. 2010-0372.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 12, 2010. Miscellaneous Orders. On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. I(12)(E), recommending that Adam Michael Binaut’s application for admission to the Ohio bar be disapproved because […]
IN RE APPLICATION OF HAUCH, 125 Ohio St.3d 1422 (2010)
2010-Ohio-2059 In re Application of Hauch. No. 2010-0362.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 12, 2010. Miscellaneous Orders. On February 26, 2010, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. I(12)(E), recommending that James Victor Hauch’s application for admission to the Ohio bar be disapproved because […]
STATE v. BASTON, 125 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2010)
2010-Ohio-2059 State v. Baston. No. 1997-2204.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 12, 2010. Lucas App. No. L-95-087. Motion and Procedural Rulings. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellee’s motion to set execution date. Upon consideration thereof, It is ordered by the court that the motion to set execution date is granted. It is further […]
STATE v. SPISAK, 125 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2010)
2010-Ohio-2059 State v. Spisak. No. 1986-1099.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 12, 2010. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 47458 and 47459. Motion and Procedural Rulings. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellee’s motion to set execution date. Upon consideration thereof, It is ordered by the court that the motion to set execution date is granted. It […]