Articles Tagged: 2010-Ohio-799

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Johnson. No. 2010-0074.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Hamilton App. No. C-090210. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Jackson. No. 2009-2313.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Union App. No. 14-09-24, 2009-Ohio-5906. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW CUPP, J., not participating.

2010-Ohio-799 Ratkosky v. CSX Transp., Inc. No. 2009-2328.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 92061, 2009-Ohio-5690. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Moore. No. 2010-0018.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 93839. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State ex rel. Singleton v. Clancy. No. 2010-0051.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

2010-Ohio-799 White v. Allstate Ins. Co. No. 2009-2360.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 92648, 2009-Ohio-5829. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 Magda v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth. No. 2010-0021.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 92570, 2009-Ohio-6219. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I and hold the cause for the decisions in 2008-0857, Kaminski v. Metal Wire Prods. Co., Columbiana […]

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Bates. No. 2009-2361.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 92323, 2009-Ohio-5819. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Banks. No. 2010-0137.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. No. 09AP-224, 2009-Ohio-5582. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Goldsberry. No. 2009-2334.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Union App. No. 14-07-06, 2009-Ohio-6026. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 King v. Sinon. No. 2009-2268.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Stark App. No. 2009CA00039, 2009-Ohio-5792. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Stevens. No. 2009-2351.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Butler App. No. CA2009-01-031, 2009-Ohio-6045. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. DeNoma. No. 2010-0093.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Ross App. No. 09CA3089, 2009-Ohio-6547. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2008-2502 State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Simonson. No. 2010-0075.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Hamilton App. No. C-080780. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 HPSC, Inc. v. Estate of Scarso. No. 2009-2357.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Lake App. No. 2009-L-110, 2009-Ohio-6032. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Moulder. No. 2009-2292.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Greene App. No. 08-CA-108, 2009-Ohio-5871. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent. Motion for appointment of counsel denied as moot.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Kaeding. No. 2009-2331.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Hamilton App. No. C-080803. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 Wertz v. Wertz. No. 2009-2343.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Montgomery App. No. 23180, 2009-Ohio-6001. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

2010-Ohio-799 Hawkins v. Integrity House, Inc. No. 2009-2311.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Lake App. No. 2008-L-120, 2009-Ohio-5893. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Felder. No. 2010-0012.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-459, 09AP-460, and 09AP-461, 2009-Ohio-6124. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Luna. No. 2009-1833.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Butler App. No. CA2008-04-115, 2009-Ohio-3421. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Colbert. No. 2009-2321.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 94123. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Calhoun. No. 2009-2324.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 92103, 2009-Ohio-6097. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Little. No. 2009-1807.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Miami App. No. 2008 CA 18, 183 Ohio App.3d 680, 2009-Ohio-4403. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS Discretionary appeal accepted. PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent. Discretionary cross-appeal not accepted.

2010-Ohio-799 In re Jefferson Cty. Sheriff v. Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Labor Council, Inc. No. 2010-0173.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Jefferson App. No. 09-JE-2, 2009-Ohio-6758. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of judgment. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ:, dissent.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Weaver. No. 2009-2322.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Butler App. No. CA2009-01-022, 2009-Ohio-5923. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1509

2010-Ohio-799 Croskey v. Universal Health Servs., Inc. No. 2009-2291.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Richland App. No. 09 CA 37, 2009-Ohio-5951. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

2010-Ohio-799 Bowman v. Butler Twp. Bd. of Trustees. No. 2009-2327.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Montgomery App. No. 23240, 2009-Ohio-6128. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Wood. No. 2009-2304.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Lorain App. No. 09CA009586, 2009-Ohio-5889. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. McGee. No. 2010-0065.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Mahoning App. No. 07 MA 137, 2009-Ohio-6397. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Chaney. No. 2009-2266.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Stark App. No. 2007CA00332, 2009-Ohio-6118. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 In re Mullen. No. 2010-0276.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Hamilton App. Nos. C-090285 and C-090407, 2009-Ohio-6934. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ decision vacating stay of order terminating interim visitation. Motion granted. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Winters. No. 2009-2342.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Lucas App. Nos. L-08-1195, L-08-1263, and L-08-1264, 2009-Ohio-5992. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2009-1997, State v. Hodge, Hamilton App. No. C-080968; and briefing schedule stayed. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

2010-Ohio-799 Pollis v. State. No. 2009-2030.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Trumbull App. No. 2008-T-0055, 2009-Ohio-5058. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387; and briefing schedule stayed.

2010-Ohio-799 Solomon v. Harwood. No. 2009-2329.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 93832. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Reese. No. 2009-2261.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Montgomery App. No. 23410, 2009-Ohio-5874. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Williams. No. 2009-1748.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 93607. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Clinton. No. 2009-2294.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Erie App. No. E-09-047. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Howard. No. 2010-0085.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Mahoning App. No. 08-MA-121, 2009-Ohio-6398. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. DiPietro. No. 2009-2259.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. No. 09AP-202, 2009-Ohio-5854. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Campbell. No. 2009-2352.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Butler App. No. CA2009-01-002, 2009-Ohio-6044. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Owens. No. 2009-2232.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Richland App. No. 09 CA 94, 2009-Ohio-6185. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Sprauer. No. 2010-0004.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Ross App. No. 09CA3121, 2009-Ohio-6698. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387, and 2008-0991 and 2008-0992, Chojnacki v. Cordray, Warren App. No. CA2008-03-A40; and briefing […]

2010-Ohio-799 Hope v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Commrs. No. 2009-2306.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Lake App. No. 2008-L-173, 2009-Ohio-5895. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Nicholson. No. 2009-1911.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 91652, 2009-Ohio-3592. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 A Q Market, Inc. v. Liquor Control Comm. No. 2009-2272.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. No. 09AP-283, 2009-Ohio-5783. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 Cincinnati v. State Emp. Relations Bd. No. 2009-2258.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. No. 09AP-261, 2009-Ohio-5782. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Readnour. No. 2010-0128.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Hamilton App. No. C-090253. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER and CUPP, JJ., dissent.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Wachtel. No. 2009-2269.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Stark App. No. 2008CA00274, 2009-Ohio-5788. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 Dukes v. Ohio Dept. of Job Family servs. No. 2010-0225.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. No. 09AP-515, 2009-Ohio-6781. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. PFEIFER and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Abouelhana. No. 2009-2300.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 92903, 2009-Ohio-5838. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW CUPP, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2009-1987, State v. Feldman, Lake App. No. 2009-L-052, 2009-Ohio-5765.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Carlisle. No. 2009-2320.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Montgomery App. No. 22970, 2009-Ohio-6004. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Singfield. No. 2009-2308.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Summit App. No. 24576, 2009-Ohio-5945. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Blackburn. No. 2009-2314.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Hancock App. No. 5-09-18, 2009-Ohio-5902. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2009-1997, State v. Hodge, Hamilton App. No. C-080968; and briefing schedule stayed. LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. Page 1506

2010-Ohio-799 Steele v. Mara Ents., Inc. No. 2009-2251.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. No. 09AP-102, 2009-Ohio-5716. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

2010-Ohio-799 In re R.J.G. No. 2010-0029.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Lake App. No. 2008-L-187, 2009-Ohio-6150. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2008-1624, In re Smith, Allen App. No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234, 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387, and 2009-0189, In re […]

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Smith. No. 2009-2241.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Hamilton App. No. C-081158. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Chavez-Juarez. No. 2009-2356.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Clark App. No. 2009-CA-33, 2009-Ohio-6130. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Grosse. No. 2009-2326.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Summit App. No. 24678, 2009-Ohio-5942. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Gingell. No. 2010-0047.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Hamilton App. No. C-081167. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL and CUPP, JJ., would also hold the cause for the decision in 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Page 1507 Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387. PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Nickel. No. 2009-2164.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Ottawa App. No. OT-09-001, 2009-Ohio-5996. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Starner. No. 2009-2270.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Marion App. No. 9-09-01, 2009-Ohio-5770. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1508

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Freeman. No. 2009-2279.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 91842, 2009-Ohio-5218. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and remand the cause for en banc consideration.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Harris. No. 2009-2296.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Hamilton App. No. C-081065. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Devine. No. 2009-2347.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 92590, 2009-Ohio-5825. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Valentin. No. 2010-0138.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Portage App. No. 2009-P-0010, 2009-Ohio-6038. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Stewart. No. 2010-0111.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. No. 09AP-817, 2009-Ohio-6423. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion for stay of jurisdictional consideration denied as moot. Page 1511

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Bell. No. 2009-2323.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 92442, 2009-Ohio-5693. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.

2010-Ohio-799 Tobacco Use Prevention Control Found, v. Boyce. No. 2010-0118.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-768, 09AP-769, 09AP-785, 09AP-786, 09AP-832, and 09AP-833, 2009-Ohio-6993. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 Fields Excavating, Inc. v. McWane, Inc. No. 2009-2303.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Clermont App. No. CA2008-12-114, 2009-Ohio-5925. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 Bank of New York v. Miller. No. 2009-2353.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Knox App. No. 09-CA-20, 2009-Ohio-6117. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion to dismiss appeal and motion for an order enjoining the unauthorized practice of law denied as moot.

2010-Ohio-799 White v. Ohio Fair Plan. No. 2009-2333.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. No. 09AP-857. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Campain. No. 2010-0136.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Richland App. Nos. 09CA35 and 09CA36, 2009-Ohio-4571 and 2009-Ohio-4573. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Leonard. No. 2010-0010.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Athens App. No. 08CA24, 2009-Ohio-6191. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1510

2010-Ohio-799 State v. James. No. 2010-0082.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. No. 09AP-368, 2009-Ohio-6274. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Molen. No. 2010-0048.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Hamilton App. No. C-080969. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. V.

2010-Ohio-799 Cleveland v. State. No. 2009-2280.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 92663, 2009-Ohio-5968. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Heft. No. 2009-2273.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Logan App. No. 8-09-08, 2009-Ohio-5908. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 Barr v. Lauer. No. 2009-2265.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 92497, 2009-Ohio-5563. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent. O’CONNOR, J., dissents and Would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

2010-Ohio-799 In re D.P. No. 2010-0027.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Lake App. No. 2008-L-186, 2009-Ohio-6149. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2008-1624, In re Smith, Allen App. No. 1-07-58, 2008-Ohio-3234, 2008-2502, State v. Bodyke, Huron App. Nos. H-07-040, H-07-041, and H-07-042, 2008-Ohio-6387, and 2009-0189, In re […]

2010-Ohio-799 Fed. Ins. Co. v. Executive Coach Luxury Travel. No. 2009-2307.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Allen App. Nos. 1-09-17 and 1-09-18, 2009-Ohio-5910. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent. CUPP, J., not participating.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Rodriquez. No. 2009-2305.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 92231, 2009-Ohio-6101. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Holmes. No. 2009-1796.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 91948, 2009-Ohio-3736. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 DaimlerChrysler Fin. Servs. N. Am., L.L.C. v. Hursell Unlimited, Inc. No. 2009-2240.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Summit App. No. 24815. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Cravens. No. 2010-0058.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Hamilton App. No. C-090078. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Bayless. No. 2009-2338.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Delaware App. No. 09 CAE 01004, 2009-Ohio-6115. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Beshara. No. 2010-0078.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Mahoning App. No. 07 MA 37, 2009-Ohio-6529. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. III.

2010-Ohio-799 Syrianoudis v. Ellsworth Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals. No. 2010-0002.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Mahoning App. No. 08 MA 191, 2009-Ohio-6247. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Gray. No. 2010-0076.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Hamilton App. No. C-081257, 2009-Ohio-5844. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. PFEIFER, O’CONNOR, and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent. Page 1505

2010-Ohio-799 Allstate Ins. Co. v. Campbell. No. 2009-2358.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-306, 09AP-307, 09AP-308, 09AP-309, 09AP-318, 09AP-319, 09AP-320, and 09AP-321, 2009-Ohio-6055. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Appeal of Allstate Insurance Company accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III. MOYER, C.J., and LANZINGER and CUPP, JJ., would also accept […]

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Russell. No. 2010-0066.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-428, 09AP-429, 09AP-430, and 09AP-431, 2009-Ohio-6420. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2009-1997 State v. Hodge, Hamilton App. No. C-080968.

2010-Ohio-799 State ex rel. Thompson v. Ross Cty. Court of Common Pleas. No. 2009-2350.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. In Procedendo. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.

2010-Ohio-799 State v. Dew. No. 2010-0071.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 10, 2010. Mahoning App. No. 08 MA 62, 2009-Ohio-6537. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.