2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 389 State v. Tayse. No. 2011-0898.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION Summit App. No. 23978. Reported at 129 Ohio St.3d 1453, 2011-Ohio-4217, 951 N.E.2d 1049. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
Articles Tagged: 2011-Ohio-5358
STATE EX REL. BARONI v. COLLETTI, 2011-0455 (10-19-2011)
2011-Ohio-5358 State ex rel. Baroni v. Colletti, Slip Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-5351. No. 2011-0455.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. MERIT DECISION WITH OPINION Summit App. No. 25334. Judgment affirmed. Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. O’Connor, C.J., not participating. Page 1
STATE v. RUARK, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Ruark. No. 2011-1080.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-50, 2011-Ohio-2225. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. HUNTER, 129 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Hunter. No. 2011-1532.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-1005, 2011-Ohio-3654. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING On motion for stay. Motion denied.
STATE v. REDDY, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Reddy. No. 2011-1106.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95814, 2011-Ohio-2927.
STATE v. McGRATH, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. McGrath. No. 2011-1051.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 93445, 2010-Ohio-4477. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. WISE, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Wise. No. 2011-1103.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No.C-100533.
DAWSON INS., INC. v. FREUND, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 389 Dawson Ins., Inc. v. Freund. No. 2011-0691.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION Cuyahoga App. No. 94660, 2011-Ohio-1552.Reported at 129 Ohio St.3d 1450, 2011-Ohio-4217, 951 N.E.2d 1047. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted and appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I; and cause held for the […]
BYKOVA v. CUYAHOGA CTY. DEPT. OF CHILDREN, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 389 Bykova v. Cuyahoga Cty. Dept. of Children Family Servs. No. 2011-0713.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION Cuyahoga App. No. 95484, 2011-Ohio-1250. Reported at 129 Ohio St.3d 1450, 2011-Ohio-4217, 951 N.E.2d 1047. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
BEVINS v. COOPER, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 389 Bevins v. Cooper. No. 2011-0882.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION In Procedendo. Reported at 129 Ohio St.3d 1443, 2011-Ohio-4217, 951 N.E.2d 1041. Motion denied.
JOHNSON v. CLEVELAND CITY SCHOOL DIST., 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Johnson v. Cleveland City School Dist. No. 2011-1078.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 94214, 2011-Ohio-2778. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. COLLIER, 129 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Collier. No. 2011-1482.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95572, 2011-Ohio-2791. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied. MCGEE BROWN, J., dissents
STATE v. GRENOBLE, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Grenoble. No. 2011-1102.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Preble App. No.CA2010-09-011, 2011-Ohio-2343.
EAC PROPERTIES, L.L.C. v. BRIGHTWELL, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 EAC Properties, L.L.C. v. Brightwell. No. 2011-1130.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-853, 2011-Ohio-2373. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
DZINA v. DZINA, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Dzina v. Dzina. No. 2011-1098.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 94748, 2011-Ohio-2668. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE v. BLACK, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Black. No. 2011-1140.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Columbiana App. No. 11 CO 8.
STATE v. HAMILTON, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Hamilton. No. 2011-1161.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Scioto App. No. 09CA3330, 2011-Ohio-2783.
STATE v. PARSONS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Parsons. No. 2011-1334.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Auglaize App. No. 2-10-27. Page 1508
STATE v. AJUMU, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Ajumu. No. 2011-1144.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95285, 2011-Ohio-2520. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
LEAK v. STATE MED.BD.OF OHIO, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Leak v. State Med.Bd.of Ohio. No. 2011-1113.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 09AP-1215, 2011-Ohio-2483. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MCGEE BROWN, J., not participating.
STATE v. PHILLIPS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Phillips. No. 2011-1093.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Summit App. No. 25408, 2011-Ohio-1348. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and remand the case for application of State v. Davis, Slip Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-5028.
EYSOLDT v. PROSCAN IMAGING, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Eysoldt v. Proscan Imaging. No. 2011-1135.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-100528, 2011-Ohio-2359. LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, J. dissent.
MAGNESIA SPECIALTIES, L.L.C. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM., 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 389 Martin Marietta Magnesia Specialties, L.L.C. v. Pub. Util. Comm. Nos. 2009-1064, 2009-1065, 2009-1067, 2009-1071, and 2009-1072.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 08-893-EL-CSS, 08-145-EL-CSS, 08-146-EL-CSS, 08-67-EL-CSS, 08-254-EL-CSS. Reported at ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2011-Ohio-4189, N.E.2d. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
HORVATH v. ISH, 129 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Horvath v. Ish. No. 2011-1089.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Summit App. No. 25442, 2011-Ohio-2239. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and McGee Brown, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. MAERLENDER, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Maerlender. No. 2011-1175.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95071, 2011-Ohio-2515.
CHESLER v. DOLLAR BANK, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Chesler v. Dollar Bank, Fed.Sav.Bank. No. 2011-0874.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95435, 193 Ohio App.3d 343, 2011-Ohio-1743. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. FAIRBANKS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Fairbanks. No. 2011-1295.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Ashland App. No. 10 COA 004. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE v. MITCHELL, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Mitchell. No. 2011-1152.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Butler App. No. CA2010-05-107, 2011-Ohio-2465.
STATE EX REL. GUNNER v. CLIPPER, 129 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 385 State ex rel. Gunner v. Clipper. No. 2011-1491.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. In Habeas Corpus. MERIT DECISION WITHOUT OPINION On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Michael J. Gunner. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
STATE v. SHERMAN, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 389 State v. Sherman. No. 2011-0748.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION Cuyahoga App. No. 95716, 2011-Ohio-1810. Reported at 129 Ohio St.3d 1451, 2011-Ohio-4217, 951 N.E.2d 1047. On motion for reconsideration. Motion.
STATE v. BEDINGHAUS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Bedinghaus. No. 2011-1167.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-100478. O’DONNELL, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law
STATE v. DORITY, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Dority. No. 2011-1141.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Erie App. No.E-09-027, 2011-Ohio-2438.
STATE v. HARSH, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Harsh. No. 2011-1112.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Butler App. No.CA2007-03-083.
TROYER v. JANIS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Troyer v. Janis. No. 2011-1162.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-434, 2011-Ohio-2538. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
SMITH v. STATE, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Smith v. State. No. 2011-1087.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-646, 2011-Ohio-2415. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, J., dissent and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2010-1660 State v. Palmer, Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-956 and 09AP-957, 2010-Ohio-2421.
STATE v. PETITTO, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Petitto. No. 2011-1137.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95276, 2011-Ohio-2391.
STATE v. SCHAIM, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Schaim. No. 2011-1148.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-100704.
STATE v. ADAMS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Adams. No. 2011-1134.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Union App. No. 14-11-08.
STATE v. GREENLEE, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Greenlee. No. 2011-1173.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-100739.
LITIGATION MGT., INC. v. BOURGEOIS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Litigation Mgt., Inc. v. Bourgeois. No. 2011-1153.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95730, 2011-Ohio-2794. O’CONNOR, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I. PFEIFER, J., dissents. Page 1507
JONES v. NASTOFF, 129 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 385 Jones v. Nastoff. No. 2011-1417.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISION WITHOUT OPINION On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
STATE EX REL. AKEMON v. HILDEBRANDT, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 389 State ex rel. Akemon v. Hildebrandt. No. 2011-1020.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. In Mandamus. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION Reported at 129 Ohio St.3d 1444, 2011-Ohio-4217, 951 N.E.2d 1042. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
STATE v. ANDERSON, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Anderson. No. 2011-1145.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-110030.
STATE v. GARRETT, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Garrett. No. 2011-1458.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Stark App. No. 2010-CA-00210.
STATE v. NOLING, 129 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Noling. No. 2011-0778.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Portage C.P. No. 95CR220. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. ORTEGA-MARTINEZ, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Ortega-Martinez. No. 2011-1169.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95656, 2011-Ohio-2540. O’Donnell, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2011-0442, Clager v. State, Licking App. No. 10-CA-49, 2010-Ohio-6074. CUPP, J., dissents.
VASSIL v. GROSS GROSS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Vassil v. Gross Gross, L.L.C. No. 2011-1168.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 94919, 2011-Ohio-1920. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE v. PIERCE, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Pierce. No. 2011-1118.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Richland App. No. 10 CA 52, 2011-Ohio-2361. O’DONNELL, J., dissents. Page 1506
STATE EX REL. DEWINE v. TRI-STATE GROUP, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State ex rel. DeWine v. Tri-State Group, Inc. No. 2011-1158.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Belmont App. No. 07-BE-38, 2011-Ohio-2719.
STATE EX REL. STRIKER v. CLINE, 2011-0571 (10-19-2011)
2011-Ohio-5358 State ex rel. Striker v. Cline, Slip Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-5350. No. 2011-0571.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. MERIT DECISION WITH OPINION Richland App. No. 09CA107, 2011-Ohio-983. Judgment affirmed. O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Page 1
STATE v. CAPERS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Capers. No. 2011-1129.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Lorain App. No. 10CA009801, 2011-Ohio-2443.
STATE v. DENT, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 389 State v. Dent. No. 2011-0729.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION Cuyahoga App. No. 94823, 2011-Ohio-1235. Reported at 129 Ohio St.3d 1451, 2011-Ohio-4217, 951 N.E.2d 1047. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
HOWARD v. GIRARD, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Howard v. Girard. No. 2011-1123.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Trumbull App. No. 2010-T-0096, 2011-Ohio-2331.
STATE v. LAIL, 129 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Lail. No. 2011-1092.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Montgomery App. No. 24118, 2011-Ohio-2312. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted and cause held for the decision in 2011-0215, In re M.W., Cuyahoga App. No. 94737, 2010-Ohio-6362; and briefing schedule stayed. CUPP, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition […]
STATE v. ANNABLE, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Annable. No. 2011-0987.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 94775, 2011-Ohio-2029. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the cross-appeal.
TARGET INDUSTRIES v. STUBBS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Target Industries v. Stubbs. No. 2011-1101.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95101, 2011-Ohio-1563. LANZINGER and CUPP, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. SMITH, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Smith. No. 2011-1056.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95505, 2011-Ohio-2400. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. McCARROLL, 129 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. McCarroll. No. 2011-1540.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 96868. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. KNAUFF, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Knauff. No. 2011-1156.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Adams App. No. 10CA900, 2011-Ohio-2725.
STATE EX REL. LOWE v. PIENDA, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 389 State ex rel. Lowe v. Pienda. No. 2011-1205.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. In Habeas Corpus. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION Reported at 129 Ohio St.3d 1445, 2011-Ohio-4217, 951 N.E.2d 1043. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. On motion for order granting release. Motion denied. Page 1509
4747 MANN, L.L.C. v. CUYAHOGA CTY.BD.OF REVISION, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 4747 Mann, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty.Bd.of Revision. No. 2011-1100.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95596, 2011-Ohio-2593. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
HOUDEK v. THYSSENKRUPP MATERIALS N.A., INC., 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Houdek v. ThyssenKrupp Materials N.A., Inc. No. 2011-1076.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95399, 2011-Ohio-1694. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. THOMAS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Thomas. No. 2011-1165.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95754, 2011-Ohio-2542.
STATE v. PRESTON, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Preston. No. 2011-1160.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Jackson App. No. 10CA4.
LIMA v. BOWERSOCK, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Lima v. Bowersock. No. 2011-1164.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Allen App. No. 1-11-22.
STATE v. WHITE, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. White. No. 2011-1127.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-34, 2011-Ohio-2364. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. OGDEN, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Ogden. No. 2011-1088.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 09AP-640, 2011-Ohio-1589. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LANZINGER, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2010-1660, State v. Palmer, Franklin App. Nos. 09AP-956 and 09AP-957, 2010-Ohio-2421.
STATE v. HOBBS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Hobbs. No. 2011-1504.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Summit App. No. 25379, 2011-Ohio-3192. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the following issue set forth in the court of appeals’ entry dated August 5, 2011: “May a law enforcement […]
STATE v. KING, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. King. No. 2011-1086.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Richland App. No. 08-CA-335. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1505
ORTEGA-MARTINEZ v. STATE, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Ortega-Martinez v. State. No. 2011-1171.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95930, 2011-Ohio-3069. O’Donnell, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in 2011-0442, Clager v. State, Licking App. No. 10-CA-49, 2010-Ohio-6074. CUPP, J., dissents.
MACKOWIAK v. MACKOWIAK, 129 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Mackowiak v. Mackowiak. No. 2011-1299.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Fayette App. No. CA2010-04-009, 2011-Ohio-3013. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING On motion for stay. Motion denied.
STATE v. ENGLISH, 129 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. English. No. 2011-1522.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Hamilton App. No.C-100401. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING On motion for delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. McWHORTER, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 389 State v. McWhorter. No. 2011-0668.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION Cuyahoga App. No. 95108, 2011-Ohio-1074.Reported at 129 Ohio St.3d 1450, 2011-Ohio-4217, 951 N.E.2d 1046. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal and remand the case for […]
SCHABEL v. TROYAN, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Schabel v. Troyan. No. 2011-1157.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Geauga App. Nos. 2010G2953 and 2010G2954, 2011-Ohio-2452.
STATE v. SCURRY, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Scurry. No. 2011-1084.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Summit App. No. 25116, 2011-Ohio-2243. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW CUPP, J., dissents.
STATE v. MILLER, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Miller. No. 2011-1174.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Stark App. No. 2011-CA-00074, 2011-Ohio-3039.
STATE v. KONDUSH, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Kondush. No. 2011-1099.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95526, 2011-Ohio-1963.
STATE EX REL. DAVILA v. E. LIVERPOOL, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 389 State ex REL. Davila v. E. Liverpool. No. 2011-0705.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISION Columbiana App. No. 10 CO 16, 2011-Ohio-1347. Reported at 129 Ohio St.3d 1450, 2011-Ohio-4217, 951 N.E.2d 1047. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
GROVE CITY v. BUCK, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Grove City v. Buck. No. 2011-1163.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. 10AP-1039, 2011-Ohio-1549. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
STATE v. PERRY, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Perry. No. 2011-1082.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Summit App. No. 25271, 2011-Ohio-2242. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. DEMUS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1508 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Demus. No. 2011-1372.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Montgomery App. No. 23801.
BANK OF AM., N.A. v. OMEGA DESIGN/BUILD GROUP, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Bank of Am., N.A. v. Omega Design/Build Group, L.L.C. No. 2011-1079.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Hamilton App. No.C-100018, 2011-Ohio-1650. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
STATE v. HARRIS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 State v. Harris. No. 2011-1074.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Hamilton App. No.C-100470, 2011-Ohio-2729. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
CORNELL v. CLERAC, INC., 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Cornell v. Clerac, Inc. No. 2011-1117.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 96517. PFEIFER, J., dissent. Motion to strike denied as moot.
ART v. ERWIN, 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Art v. Erwin. No. 2011-1108.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-747, 2011-Ohio-2371. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
WINGATES v. SOUTH-WESTERN CITY SCH. BD. OF EDN., 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Wingates, L.L.C. v. South-Western City Schools Bd. of Edn. No. 2011-1046.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-846, 2011-Ohio-2372. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
SUMMIT CTY.CHILDREN SERVS. BD. v. OHIO STATE BD., 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Summit Cty.Children Servs. Bd. v. Ohio State Personnel Bd. of Review. No. 2011-1132.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-780, 2011-Ohio-2543. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Lundberg Stratton, J. dissents.
STATE v. RIDLEY, 129 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Ridley. No. 2011-1155.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-100301, 2011-Ohio-2477.
MORRISSETTE v. DFS SERVS., L.L.C., 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Morrissette v. DFS Servs., L.L.C. No. 2011-1128.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-633, 2011-Ohio-2369. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
BOGGS v. BAUM, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 Boggs v. Baum. No. 2011-1138.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 10AP-864, 2011-Ohio-2489. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. TULETA, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 State v. Tuleta. No. 2011-1121.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 94992, 2011-Ohio-1923.
LEAK v. MATIA, 129 Ohio St.3d 1502 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 385 Leak v. Matia. No. 2011-1404.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. In Procedendo. MERIT DECISION WITHOUT OPINION On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. Page 1503
CLEVELAND v. CUNNINGHAM, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Cleveland v. Cunningham. No. 2011-1083.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95267, 2011-Ohio-2276. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’Donnell, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. DEARFIELD, 2010-2254 (10-19-2011)
2011-Ohio-5358 Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Dearfield, Slip Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-5295. No. 2010-2254.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. MERIT DECISION WITH OPINION On Certified Report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 10-036. G. Timothy Dearfield of Loveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0039684, is suspended from the practice law in Ohio for […]
IN RE G.S., 129 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 In re G.S. No. 2011-1090.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. Nos. 96158, 96159, and 96160, 2011-Ohio-2158. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
YOUNG v. CUYAHOGA CTY.BD.OF MENTAL RETARDATION, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 386 Young v. Cuyahoga Cty.Bd.of Mental Retardation Developmental Disabilities. No. 2011-1073.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95955, 2011-Ohio-2291. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, C.J., AND LANZINGER, J., dissent and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.
STATE v. HALL, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Fredrick Hall. No. 2011-1147.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Hamilton App. No. C-100097, 2011-Ohio-2527.
STRODTBECK v. LAKE HOSP. SYS., 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Strodtbeck v. Lake Hosp. Sys., Inc. No. 2011-1122.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Lake App. No. 2010-L-053, 2011-Ohio-2327.
CUYAHOGA METRO.HOUS.AUTH. v. RABB, 129 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 387 Cuyahoga Metro.Hous.Auth. v. Rabb. No. 2011-1085.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 95658, 2011-Ohio-2287. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. WILLIAMS, 129 Ohio St.3d 1506 (2011)
2011-Ohio-5358, 955 N.E.2d 388 State v. Williams. No. 2011-1142.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 19, 2011. APPEAL NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Cuyahoga App. No. 95483, 2011-Ohio-2397.