597 N.E.2d 166, 167Supreme Court of Ohio. 1992. DISCIPLINARY DOCKET Wednesday, August 19, 1992 92-1342. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Sullivan. On written request of respondent, it is ordered that the time for filing objections is hereby extended to August 10, 1992. WRIGHT, J., not participating. Page 1449
Articles Tagged: 597 N.E.2d 166
DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, 64 Ohio St.3d 1447 (1992)
597 N.E.2d 166, 167Supreme Court of Ohio. 1992. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONAND JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS OVERRULED Wednesday, August 19, 1992 92-935. State v. Nave. Wood County, No. 92WD015. RESNICK, J., not participating.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS, 64 Ohio St.3d 1447 (1992)
597 N.E.2d 166, 167Supreme Court of Ohio. 1992. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSIALS Friday, August 14, 1992 91-2386. State ex rel. Scheiman v. Warrensville Hts. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of the joint application to dismiss with prejudice, IT IS ORDERED by […]
MERIT DOCKET, 64 Ohio St.3d 1447 (1992)
597 N.E.2d 166, 167Supreme Court of Ohio. 1992. MERIT DOCKET Friday, August 14, 1992 92-1546. State ex rel. Shum v. Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Rev. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration […]
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS, 64 Ohio St.3d 1448 (1992)
597 N.E.2d 166, 167Supreme Court of Ohio. 1992. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSIALS Wednesday, August 19, 1992 92-858. State v. Cadwallader. Cuyahoga County, No. 60006. Sua sponte, cause dismissed for want of prosecution, effective August 17, 1992. 92-1165. Jackson v. Regional Transit Auth. Cuyahoga County, No. 60443. Sua sponte, cause dismissed for want of prosecution, effective August 17, […]
JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS ALLOWED, 64 Ohio St.3d 1448 (1992)
597 N.E.2d 166, 167Supreme Court of Ohio. 1992. JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS ALLOWED Wednesday, August 19, 1992 92-823. Gallimore v. Children’s Hosp. Med. Ctr. Hamilton County, Nos. C-890808 and C-890824. On motion and cross-motion to certify the record. Cause allowed on Proposition of Law No. I only. DOUGLAS, J., would allow the entire cause. MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY […]
MOTION DOCKET, 64 Ohio St.3d 1447 (1992)
597 N.E.2d 166, 167Supreme Court of Ohio. 1992. MOTION DOCKET Wednesday, August 19, 1992 90-1914. State v. Franklin. Hamilton County, No. C-890028. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies, IT IS ORDERED by the court […]