700 N.E.2d 619 SuperAmerica Group, Div. of Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections. 98-1940Supreme Court of Ohio. October 15, 1998 Licking App. No. 97CA00131. This. cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right from the Court of Appeals for Licking County. Upon consideration of appellants […]
Articles Tagged: 700 N.E.2d 619
STATE EX REL. LTV STEEL CO. v. CONRAD, 83 Ohio St.3d 1456 (1998)
700 N.E.2d 619 State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Conrad. 98-449Supreme Court of Ohio. October 12, 1998 In Mandamus and Procedendo. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and procedendo. Upon consideration of the joint application for dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that […]
ELSASS v. COLUMBUS BAR ASSN., 83 Ohio St.3d 1457 (1998)
700 N.E.2d 619 Elsass v. Columbus Bar Assn. 98-1909Supreme Court of Ohio. October 13, 1998 On September 16, 1998, appellant, Tobias H. Elsass, filed with this court a notice of appeal and on September 21, 1998, appellee, Columbus Bar Association, flied a motion to dismiss appellants appeal. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the […]
CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. HATFIELD, 83 Ohio St.3d 1456 (1998)
700 N.E.2d 619 Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hatfield. 96-1966Supreme Court of Ohio. October 12, 1998 This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on July 17, 1998, by the Clients Security Fund of a motion for order to show cause why respondent should not be found in contempt for failure to comply with […]
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. GATWOOD, 83 Ohio St.3d 1456 (1998)
700 N.E.2d 619 Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood. 96-2480Supreme Court of Ohio. October 12, 1998 This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on July 17, 1998, by the Clients Security Fund of a motion for order to show cause why respondent should not be found in contempt for failure to comply with this […]
AKRON BAR ASSN. v. SNYDER, 83 Ohio St.3d 1456 (1998)
700 N.E.2d 619 Akron Bar Assn. v. Snyder. 96-2428Supreme Court of Ohio. October 12, 1998 This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on July 27, 1998, hy the Clients Security Fund of a motion for order to show cause why respondent should not be found in contempt for failure to comply with […]