Articles Tagged: 708 N.E.2d 1010

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Gamboa. No. 99-130.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Cuyahoga App. No. 72986.

708 N.E.2d 1010 Miller v. Leesburg. No. 99-99.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Franklin App. Nos. 97APE10-1379 and 97APE10-1380. MOYER, C.J., dissents. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., not participating.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Huntsman. No. 99-147.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Stark App. No. 98CA0012. MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Boyd. No. 99-117.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Lucus App. No. L-97-1366. RESNICK, J., not participating.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Bias. No. 99-145.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Hamilton App. No. C-980165.

708 N.E.2d 1010 Houk v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. No. 99-142.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Williams App. No. WM-989-014. DOUGLAS and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent. RESNICK, J., not participating.

708 N.E.2d 1010 Caron v. Caron. No. 99-90Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Franklin App. No. 98AP-369. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents, would allow this cause, and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals on authority of Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency v. Guthrie (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 437 705 N.E.2d 318.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Hartman. No. 99-89Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Hamilton App. No. C-971035. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Mirmohamed. No. 99-136.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Franklin App. No. 97APA11-1492. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., would allow on Proposition of Law No. I and hold this cause for the decision in 98-2, State v. Rance, Lucas App. No. L-96-277.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Caudill. No. 99-114.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Hancock App. No. 5-97-35.

708 N.E.2d 1010 Black v. Pheils. No. 99-113.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Wood App. No. WD-98-029. RESNICK, J., not participating.

708 N.E.2d 1010 Hart v. Wilkerson. No. 99-540.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999 In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG, STRATTON, JJ., concur.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Gulertekin. No. 99-104.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Franklin App. No. 97APA12-1607. On appeal of Fugen Gulertekin. Appeal denied. On cross-appeal of state of Ohio (felony only). Cross-appeal denied. MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. Page 1456

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Pitchford. No. 99-148.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Cuyahoga App. No. 37395.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Schultz. No. 99-116.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Pickaway App. No. 98CA07.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Scudder. No. 99-137.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Franklin App. No. 97APA12-1642.

708 N.E.2d 1010 Roe v. Shaia Parking, Inc. No. 99-97.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Cuyahoga App. No. 73756.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Vroman. No. 99-121.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Ross App. No. 98CA2404.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Dotson. No. 99-155.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Summit App. No. 19053. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.

708 N.E.2d 1010 Davis v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. No. 99-560.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999 In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Adelman. No. 99-127.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Summit App. No. 18824.

708 N.E.2d 1010 FOE Aerie 0895 v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm. No. 99-170.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Lawrence App. No. 98CA09.

708 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Montesi. No. 99-88Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999. Hamilton App. No. C-970858. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.

708 N.E.2d 1010 Montecalvo v. Montecalvo. No. 99-594.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 21, 1999 Appeal from the Trumbull App. No. 98-T-0175. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that no conflict exists within the meaning of S. Ct. Prac. R. IV(2)(B). This cause is therefore dismissed. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, […]