709 N.E.2d 170 BAKER v. STARCIC. No. 99-196.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999 APPEAL from Cuyahoga App. No. 74591.
Articles Tagged: 709 N.E.2d 170
URSETTI v. OMLIN, 85 Ohio St.3d 1464 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 URSETTI v. OMLIN. No. 99-199.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999 APPEAL from Lake App. No. 97-L-287.
IN RE COVINGTON/GRAHAM, 85 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 IN RE COVINGTON/GRAHAM CHILDREN. No. 99-135.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999 APPEAL from Stark App. No. 1997CA00406. Page 1464
STATE v. JOHNSON, 85 Ohio St.3d 1464 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 STATE v. JOHNSON. No. 99-140.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999 APPEAL FROM Scioto App. No. 98CA2576.
CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. BAILEY, 85 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. BAILEY. No. 99-157.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 26, 1999. Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to strike motion for order to show cause, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to strike be, and hereby is, denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that […]
STATE v. REEDER, 85 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 STATE v. REEDER. No. 99-94.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999. APPEAL from Clinton App. No. CA97-12-013. DOUGLAS, J., would allow on Proposition of Law No. I. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., would allow.
STATE v. PEEPLES, 85 Ohio St.3d 1464 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 STATE v. PEEPLES. No. 99-166.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999 APPEAL FROM Pickaway App. No. 98CA24.
CINCINNATI v. CRIPE, 85 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 CINCINNATI v. CRIPE. No. 99-129.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999 APPEAL from Hamilton App. Nos. C-980061 and C-980062.
STATE v. JOHNSON, 85 Ohio St.3d 1464 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 STATE v. JOHNSON. No. 99-191.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999 APPEAL FROM Hamilton App. No. C-980266. On motion for admission pro hac vice. Motion denied.
IN RE SILKA, 85 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 IN RE ESTATE OF SILKA. No. 99-123.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999. APPEAL from Lucas App. No. L-98-1057. DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., not participating.
BIAS v. HARRISON, 85 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 BIAS v. HARRISON. No. 99-102.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999. APPEAL from Cuyahoga App. No. 74906.
RAIFSNYDER v. WILKERSON, 85 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 RAIFSNYDER v. WILKERSON. No. 99-568.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999. In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED
STATE v. DAWSON, 85 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 State v. Dawson. No. 99-86.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999. APPEAL from Madison App. No. CA98-04-021.
KENISON v. KENISON, 85 Ohio St.3d 1464 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 KENISON v. KENISON. No. 99-160.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999 APPEAL FROM Franklin App. No. 98AP-205. DOUGLAS, J., dissents.
SPRINGS v. DONOFRIO, 85 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 SPRINGS v. DONOFRIO. No. 99-79.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 26, 1999. In Procedendo. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of procedendo. It appears from the records of this court that relator has not filed a merit brief, due April 1, 1999, in compliance […]
WALTON v. KNEIPP, 85 Ohio St.3d 1464 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 WALTON v. KNEIPP. No. 99-192.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999 APPEAL from Hamilton App. No. C-980285.
WHITEHALL v. CARTER, 85 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 170 WHITEHALL v. CARTER. No. 99-96.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 28, 1999. APPEAL from Franklin App. No. 98AP-167.