STATE v. SMITH, 86 Ohio St.3d 1415 (1999)

711 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Smith. No. 99-754.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 30, 1999. Lorain App. No. 97CA006904. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent, would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. III and IV, and would hold this cause for the decision in 98-2301 State v. Gowdy, Hamilton App. No. C-970359.

Read More

STATE v. PLUMMER, 86 Ohio St.3d 1415 (1999)

711 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Plummer. No. 99-792.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 30, 1999. Cuyahoga App. No. 72876. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent, would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. I and III, and would hold this cause for the decision in 98-2301 State v. Gowdy, Hamilton App. No. C-970359.

Read More

STATE v. DUKE, 86 Ohio St.3d 1414 (1999)

711 N.E.2d 1010 State v. Duke. No. 99-667.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 30, 1999. Fulton App. No. F-98-010. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. II and III and hold the cause for the decision in 98-1779, State v. Conyers, Lucas App. No. L-97-1327. RESNICK, J., not participating. Page 1415

Read More