Articles Tagged: 715 N.E.2d 569

715 N.E.2d 569 Harper v. Imm. No. 99-1151.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Hamilton App. No. C-980768. RESNICK, J., dissents. RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

715 N.E.2d 569 Akron Bar Assn. v. Hoffer. No. 98-2640.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Reported at 86 Ohio St.3d 97, 712 N.E.2d 116. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

715 N.E.2d 569 McMillian v. Haueter. No. 99-1125.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Geauga App. Nos. 98-G-2124 and 98-G-2125. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents.

715 N.E.2d 569 Forbes v. Midwest Air Charter, Inc. No. 91-1259.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Cuyahoga App. No. 56815. Reported at 86 Ohio St.3d 83, 711 N.E.2d 997. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

715 N.E.2d 569 Foster v. England. No. 99-1078.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Fairfield App. No. 98CA57.

715 N.E.2d 569 GRE Ins. Group v. Internatl. EPDM Rubber Roofing Sys., Inc. No. 99-1084.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Lucas App. No. L-98-1387. COOK, J., dissents.

715 N.E.2d 569 Specht v. BP Am., Inc. No. 98-1.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Cuyahoga App. No. 71899. Reported at 86 Ohio St.3d 29, 711 N.E.2d 225. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. Page 1468

715 N.E.2d 569 Perez v. Ponce. No. 99-1091.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Summit App. No. 18996.

715 N.E.2d 569 State v. Pettis. No. 99-1136.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Cuyahoga App. No. 74989.

715 N.E.2d 569 Professional Balance Co. v. Fulton Assoc. Balance Co. No. 99-1042.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Lake App. No. 97-L-238. RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.

715 N.E.2d 569 State v. Stefanski. No. 99-1031.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Marion App. No. 9-98-63. Reported at 86 Ohio St.3d 1418, 711 N.E.2d 1012. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET The Supreme Court of Ohio has issued orders imposing […]

715 N.E.2d 569 Renicker v. Smith. No. 99-1065.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Tuscarawas App. No. 1998AP090107. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.

715 N.E.2d 569 Warstler v. Hein. No. 99-1135.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Cuyahoga App. No. 74078. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents.

715 N.E.2d 569 State v. McCauley. No. 99-1053.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Cuyahoga App. No. 73892.

715 N.E.2d 569 Princeton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Princeton Assn. of Classroom Educators, OEA/NEA. No. 99-1066.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Hamilton App. No. C-980793.

715 N.E.2d 569 Cook v. Cincinnati. No. 99-900.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Hamilton App. No. C-980552. Reported at 86 Ohio St.3d 1416, 711 N.E.2d 1011. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

715 N.E.2d 569 Holder v. Holder. No. 99-1052.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Butler App. No. CA98-08-170.

715 N.E.2d 569 Hornung v. Hornung. No. 99-1046.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Cuyahoga App. Nos. 73659 and 73667.

715 N.E.2d 569 Mayo v. Kenwood Country Club, Inc. No. 99-1064.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Hamilton App. No. C-980528. RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

715 N.E.2d 569 Northwood v. Wood Cty. Regional Water Sewer Dist. No. 98-522.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement: September 1, 1999. APPEAL from Wood App. No. WD-97-010. Reported at 86 Ohio St.3d 92, 711 N.E.2d 1003. On amicus curiae motion for leave to file under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI. Motion denied for want of four votes on the […]