Articles Tagged: 719 N.E.2d 967

719 N.E.2d 967 State ex rel. Untied v. Taft. No. 99-1553.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. MOTION DOCKET In Mandamus. On request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Request denied. Lundberg Stratton, J., would dismiss.

719 N.E.2d 967 Lee v. Mendel. No. 99-1706.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Franklin App. No. 98AP-1404.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Davenport. No. 99-1687.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Hamilton App. No. C-980516. Moyer, C.J., would allow on Proposition of Law No. I.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Stefanski. No. 99-1665.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Marion App. No. 9-98-63.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. McLemore. No. 99-1676.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Lorain App. No. 99CA007377.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Larkins. No. 99-1690.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Cuyahoga App. Nos. 74302 and 74303.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. McElfresh. No. 99-1693.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Licking App. No. 99CA00001.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Oviedo. No. 99-1694.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Wood App. No. WD-98-061.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Patterson. No. 99-1680.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Cuyahoga App. No. 74348. Page 1451

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Southall. No. 99-1880.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. MOTION DOCKET Appeal from Stark App. No. 1999CA0140. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

719 N.E.2d 967 State ex rel. Hunter v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas. No. 99-1590.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. MOTION DOCKET Appeal from Cuyahoga App. No. 76161. On motion for leave to supplement record. Motion denied.

719 N.E.2d 967 Mun. Micro Computer Sys., Inc. v. Madonia. No. 99-1696.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Cuyahoga App. No. 76380.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Fluker. No. 99-1877.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. MOTION DOCKET Appeal from Lorain App. No. 97CA006930. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents. Page 1452

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Weaver. No. 99-1707.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Franklin App. No. 98AP-1345.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Pena. No. 99-1730.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Cuyahoga App. No. 76717. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Code. No. 99-1830.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. MOTION DOCKET Appeal from Cuyahoga App. No. 74590. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

719 N.E.2d 967 Nwabara v. Willacy. No. 99-1719.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Cuyahoga App. No. 74139. On discretionary appeal and on motion for sanctions for frivolous action. Appeal and motion denied.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Henry. No. 99-1824.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. MOTION DOCKET Appeal from Montgomery App. No. 17261. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

719 N.E.2d 967 Sadey v. Metromedia Steakhouses Co., L.P. No. 99-1670.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Cuyahoga App. No. 74178.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Dawson. No. 99-1883.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. MOTION DOCKET Appeal from Summit App. No. 19179. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issues stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed September 22, 1999, […]

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Holly. No. 99-1729.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Cuyahoga App. No. 74452.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Mootispaw. No. 99-1672.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Fayette App. No. CA99-01-001.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Smith. No. 99-1701.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED Appeal from Mahoning App. No. 97CA5. Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

719 N.E.2d 967 State v. Martin. No. 99-1841.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 24, 1999. MOTION DOCKET Appeal from Hamilton App. No. C-960563. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.