720 N.E.2d 920 Cotten v. Wilkinson. No. 99-1977.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 14, 1999. MERIT DOCKET In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Page 1467 Upon consideration of respondents’ answer. IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, […]
Articles Tagged: 720 N.E.2d 920
IN RE AL’UQDAH, 87 Ohio St.3d 1466 (1999)
720 N.E.2d 920 In re Al’Uqdah. No. 99-1772.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 13, 1999. DISCIPLINARY DOCKET On October 20, 1999, this court suspended respondent, William Al’Uqdah, a.k.a. William Mujahid Al’Uqdah, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On October 27, 1999, respondent filed a motion for stay of imposition of sanctions and on […]
STATE EX REL. MESSINA v. STEINER, 87 Ohio St.3d 1466 (1999)
720 N.E.2d 920 State ex rel. Messina v. Steiner. No. 99-1659.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 13, 1999. MOTION DOCKET In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for emergency stay of the Licking County Court of Common Pleas proceedings. […]
STATE v. CHIOLO, 87 Ohio St.3d 1466 (1999)
720 N.E.2d 920 State v. Chiolo. No. 99-1992.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 13, 1999. MOTION DOCKET Appeal from Stark App. No. 1999CA00030. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right from the Court of Appeals for Stark County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of further […]
STATE v. WILLIAMS, 87 Ohio St.3d 1466 (1999)
720 N.E.2d 920 State v. Williams. No. 99-1878.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 13, 1999. MOTION DOCKET Appeal from Lucas C.P. No. CR991366. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for extension of time to transmit the record. IT […]
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET, 87 Ohio St.3d 1467 (1999)
720 N.E.2d 920Supreme Court of Ohio. 1999. MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET The Supreme Court of Ohio has issued orders imposing sanctions upon one hundred sixty six attorneys for noncompliance with the requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education. The text of the entry imposing the sanction is reproduced below. This is followed by a list […]