2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 Borger v. Utica Natl. Ins. Group. No. 2004-1396.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Montgomery App. No. 20213, 2004-Ohio-3782. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2003-2079, Hollon v. Clary, Montgomery App. No. 19826, 2003-Ohio-5734; and briefing schedule stayed. RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, […]
Articles Tagged: 818 N.E.2d 710
STATE v. TOMLINSON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Tomlinson. No. 2004-1386.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Cuyahoga App. No. 83411, 2004-Ohio-3295. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1409
STATE v. THACKER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Thacker. No. 2004-1340.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Franklin App. No. 03AP-653, 2004-Ohio-3828. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., dissents.
STATE v. MARCUM, 104 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Marcum. No. 2004-1734.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Hocking App. No. 04CA13. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for immediate stay of further execution of sentence and release on recognizance or, in the alternative, motion for bond. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.
STATE v. BROWN, 104 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Brown. No. 2004-1752.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Fayette App. No. CA2003-07-008, 2004-Ohio-3996. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. SMITH, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Smith. No. 2004-1365.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Cuyahoga App. No. 83007, 2004-Ohio-3619. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. KING, 104 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. King. No. 2004-1754.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Montgomery App. No. 19814, 2004-Ohio-262. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
STATE v. DOWELL, 104 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Dowell. No. 2004-1782.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Cuyahoga App. No. 83575, 2004-Ohio-3870. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent. Page 1408
STATE v. JESTER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Jester. No. 2004-1330.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Cuyahoga App. No. 83520, 2004-Ohio-3611. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. FEARS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Fears. No. 2004-1364.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Hamilton App. No. C-020697. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
MARTIN v. WAYNE CTY. NATL. BANK., 104 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 Martin v. Wayne Cty. Natl. Bank. No. 2004-1390.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Wayne App. No. 03CA0079, 2004-Ohio-4194. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. McNEIL, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. McNeil. No. 2004-1371.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Hamilton App. No. C-000808. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. BLAND, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Bland No. 2004-1385.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Cuyahoga App. No. 83430, 2004-Ohio-3742. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. WHITT, 104 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Whitt. No. 2004-1398.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Cuyahoga App. No. 82293, 2004-Ohio-3620. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. BROWN, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Brown. No. 2004-1302.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Richland App. No. 2003-CA-01, 2004-Ohio-3368. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. ANTHONY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Anthony. No. 2004-1464.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Hamilton App. No. C-030510, 2004-Ohio-3894. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
CARLTON OIL CORP. v. E. OHIO GAS CO., 104 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 Carlton Oil Corp. v. E. Ohio Gas Co. No. 2004-1402.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Washington App. No. 03CA59, 2004-Ohio-3849. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
STATE v. GHOLSTON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Gholston. No. 2004-1382.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Hamilton App. No. C-030788. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. PELFREY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Pelfrey. No. 2004-1288.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Montgomery App. No. 19955, 2004-Ohio-3401. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
ESTATE OF HARROLD v. COLLIER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 Estate of Harrold v. Collier. No. 2004-1492.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Wayne App. No. 03CA0064, 2004-Ohio-4331. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2004-1647, Estate of Harrold v. Collier, Wayne App. No. 03CA0064, 2004-Ohio-4331. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents.
DUFF v. COSHOCTON CTY. BD. OF COMMRS., 104 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 Duff v. Coshocton Cty. Bd. of Commrs. No. 2004-1387.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Coshocton App. No. 03-CA-019, 2004-Ohio-3713. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
ELRIDGE v. CLEVELAND, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 Elridge v. Cleveland No. 2004-1384.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Cuyahoga App. No. 83776, 2004-Ohio-3604. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. PEREZ, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Perez. No. 2004-1379.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Licking App. No. 03-CA-107, 2004-Ohio-3646. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CARSON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6364, 818 N.E.2d 710 State v. Carson. No. 2004-1377.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 1, 2004. Greene App. No. 03CA11, 2004-Ohio-3775. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW