2004-Ohio-6585, 819 N.E.2d 707 State ex rel. Harris v. Martinez. No. 2004-1805.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 15, 2004. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., would deny the motion to dismiss and […]
Articles Tagged: 819 N.E.2d 707
PRUITT v. COURT OF APPEALS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6585, 819 N.E.2d 707 State ex rel. Pruitt v. Court of Appeals, Sixth Appellate District. No. 2004-1629.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 15, 2004. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Mandamus. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination and consideration of respondent’s answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG […]
STATE EX REL. VAN AUKEN v. BLACKWELL, 104 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6585, 819 N.E.2d 707 State ex rel. Van Auken v. Blackwell. No. 2004-1720.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 15, 2004. Franklin App. No. 04AP-952, 2004-Ohio-5355. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS This appeal of right concerns appellants’ claim for a writ of mandamus to compel the placement of candidates for President and Vice-President of the United States […]
STATE v. TUCKER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1424 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6585, 819 N.E.2d 707 State v. Tucker. No. 2004-1806.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 15, 2004. Stark App. No. 2002CA00389, 2003-Ohio-5421. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
ISRAFIL v. COURT OF APPEALS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6585, 819 N.E.2d 707 Israfil v. Court of Appeals, First Appellate District. No. 2004-1750.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 15, 2004. In Prohibition. On answers of respondents, motion to dismiss, and motion for summary judgment. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and […]
STATE v. WALKER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1424 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6585, 819 N.E.2d 707 State v. Walker. No. 2004-1804.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 15, 2004. Lawrence App. No. 04 C.A. 23. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
BEREA CITY SCHOOL DIST. v. CUYAHOGA CTY. AUD., 104 Ohio St.3d 1424 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6585, 819 N.E.2d 707 Berea City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Auditor. No. 2003-2168.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 15, 2004. Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2003-J-143, 2003-J-144 and 2003-J-150. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On request for oral argument. Request granted. O’DONNELL, J., dissents.