2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 GAMBLE v. NORWOOD. No. 2004-1743.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040019, 2004-Ohio-4661. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Scott Bullock, Robert W. Gall, William H. Mellor, and Dana Berliner by Robert P. […]
Articles Tagged: 821 N.E.2d 1026
STATE v. HELLE, 105 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 STATE v. HELLE. No. 2004-1663.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Allen App. No. 1-04-18, 2004-Ohio-4398. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. DUNN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 STATE v. DUNN. No. 2004-1713.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83754, 2004-Ohio-4350. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents.
JACOBS v. ANDERSON, 105 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 JACOBS v. ANDERSON. No. 2004-1684.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Lorain App. No. 03CA008391, 2004-Ohio-4456. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STARK COMMONS, LTD. v. STEIN MART, INC., 105 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 STARK COMMONS, LTD. v. STEIN MART, INC. No. 2004-2166.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00029, 2004-Ohio-6969. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. Page 1405
MTGE. ELECTRONIC REGN. SYS., INC. v. BARCLAY, 105 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 MTGE. ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYS., INC. v. BARCLAY. No. 2004-1698.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-1198. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MARRONE v. PHILLIP MORRIS, USA, INC., 105 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 MARRONE v. PHILLIP MORRIS, USA, INC. No. 2004-1824.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Medina App. No. 03CA0120-M, 2004-Ohio-4874. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law I. PFEIFER, J., dissents. RESNICK, J., not participating. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Robert C. Heim, Ezra […]
STATE v. ARCHIE, 105 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 STATE v. ARCHIE. No. 2004-1710.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-02-1225 and L-02-1262, 2004-Ohio-4844. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. QUINN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 STATE v. QUINN. No. 2004-1719.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Darke App. No. 04CA1642. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
SHARONVILLE v. AM. EMP. INS. CO., 105 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 SHARONVILLE v. AM. EMP. INS. CO. No. 2004-1735.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030905, 2004-Ohio-4664. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. MOORE, 105 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 STATE v. MOORE. No. 2004-1712.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Greene App. No. 04CA68. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. NICHOLSON, 105 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 STATE v. NICHOLSON. No. 2004-1721.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Stark App. No. 2004CA00027, 2004-Ohio-4850. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1406
STATE v. INSKEEP, 105 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 STATE v. INSKEEP. No. 2004-2117.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Champaign App. No. 2003 CA 22, 2004-Ohio-4927. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
PARSONS v. OHIO BUR. OF WORKERS’ COMP., 105 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 PARSONS v. OHIO BUR. OF WORKERS’ COMP. No. 2004-1738.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-772, 2004-Ohio-4552. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. FRANKLIN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 STATE v. FRANKLIN. No. 2004-2097.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Stark App. No. 2003CA00442, 2004-Ohio-5398. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. JAMES, 105 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 STATE v. JAMES. No. 2004-2119.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030695, 2004-Ohio-5727. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
MARTYNYSZYN v. BUDD, 105 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 MARTYNYSZYN v. BUDD. No. 2004-1661.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 03-MA-250, 2004-Ohio-4824. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. MARCUM, 105 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 STATE v. MARCUM. No. 2004-1734.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Hocking App. No. 04CA13. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
OHIO VALLEY ORTHO v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, 105 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 OHIO VALLEY ORTHOPAEDICS SPORTS MEDICINE, INC. v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF SYCAMORE TWP. No. 2004-1729.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030697, 2004-Ohio-4662. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.
ORIANA HOUSE, INC. v. MONTGOMERY, 105 Ohio St.3d 1405 (2005)
2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1026 ORIANA HOUSE, INC. v. MONTGOMERY. No. 2004-1769.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-1178, 2004-Ohio-4788. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Propositions of Law I and III. RESNICK, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.