821 N.E.2d 1028 – LexRoll (OH)

STATE v. NEWMAN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)

2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1028 STATE v. NEWMAN. No. 2004-1934.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Summit App. No. 21970, 2004-Ohio-5180. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

MOSS v. BUSH, 105 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)

2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1028 MOSS v. BUSH. No. 2004-2088.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 3, 2005. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING On Petition to Contest Election. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition to contest an election under R.C. 3515.08. Upon review of the motion for leave of John Conyers, Jr., […]

STATE v. KAPSOURIS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2005)

2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1028 STATE v. KAPSOURIS. No. 2004-1866.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 02 CA 230, 2004-Ohio-5119. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’CONNOR, J., dissents and would accept on Proposition of Law II. Page 1408

IN RE RESIGNATION OF CITTADINO, 105 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)

2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1028 IN RE RESIGNATION OF CITTADINO. No. 2004-0790.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 3, 2005. DISCIPLINARY CASES IT IS ORDERED by this court, sua sponte, that Mary Elizabeth Cittadino, Attorney Registration No. 0074458, last known business address in West Chester, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s […]

RIMEDIO v. SUMMACARE, INC., 105 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)

2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1028 RIMEDIO v. SUMMACARE, INC. No. 2004-1867.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Summit App. No. 21828, 2004-Ohio-4971. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.

STATE v. PRINES, 105 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)

2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1028 STATE v. PRINES. No. 2004-1891.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85196. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.

CORPOREX DEV. CONSTR. MGT. v. SHOOK, INC., 105 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)

2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1028 CORPOREX DEV. CONSTR. MGT., INC. v. SHOOK, INC. No. 2004-0752.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 3, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-269, 2004-Ohio-1408. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the joint motion to […]

STATE v. WILLIS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)

2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1028 STATE v. WILLIS. No. 2004-0144.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 3, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 82313, 2003-Ohio-6329. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a […]

BUNCE v. LORAIN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1408 (2005)

2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1028 BUNCE v. LORAIN. No. 2004-1870.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Lorain App. No. 04CA008422, 2004-Ohio-4948. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.

BRANNON v. WARREN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2005)

2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1028 BRANNON v. WARREN. No. 2004-1865.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 2, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2003-T-0077, 2004-Ohio-5105. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

STATE EX REL. RITTNER v. DENNIS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1409 (2005)

2005-Ohio-286, 821 N.E.2d 1028 STATE EX REL. RITTNER v. DENNIS. No. 2004-1945.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 3, 2005. Williams App. No. WM-04-009, 2004-Ohio-5679. MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Williams County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has […]

Articles Tagged: 821 N.E.2d 1028