2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 STATE v. HUMPHREY. No. 2004-2027.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Crawford App. No. 3-04-15. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. PFEIFER, J., dissents.
Articles Tagged: 821 N.E.2d 576
STATE v. McKINNEY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 STATE v. McKINNEY. No. 2004-2060.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Defiance App. No. 4-04-12, 2004-Ohio-5518. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
STATE EX REL. FISHER v. CLEVELAND, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 STATE EX REL. FISHER v. CLEVELAND. No. 2004-1726.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83945, 2004-Ohio-4345. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, PFEIFER and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
BADGER v. McGREGOR, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 BADGER v. McGREGOR. No. 2004-1548.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-167, 2004-Ohio-4036. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted. RESNICK, PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent. Cross-appeal not accepted. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents.
JOHNSON v. MICROSOFT CORP., 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 JOHNSON v. MICROSOFT CORP. No. 2004-0304.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-020564, 2004-Ohio-761. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for admission pro hac vice of Norman Hawker and Albert A. Foer by Mark D. Tucker. Motion granted. PFEIFER, J., not participating.
NEDEA v. STATE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 NEDEA v. STATE. No. 2004-2062.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Romulus Nedea. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
SIDENSTRICKER v. MILLER PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 SIDENSTRICKER v. MILLER PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, INC. No. 2004-1739.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-827, 2004-Ohio-4653. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2004-1169, Jones v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Co., Summit App. No. 21724, 2004-Ohio-2821; and briefing schedule stayed. RESNICK and […]
CINCINNATI GAS ELEC. CO. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM., 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 CINCINNATI GAS ELECTRIC CO. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM. No. 2004-0563.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Public Utilities Commission, No. 01-2164-EL-ORD. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for admission pro hac vice of James H. Bolin by Paul A. Colbert. Motion granted.
STATE v. CUMMINGS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 STATE v. CUMMINGS. No. 2004-1678.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83759, 2004-Ohio-4470. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent.
IN RE BROWN, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 IN RE BROWN. No. 2004-2093.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Darke App. No. 04-CA-1651. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
STATE EX REL. PLAIN DEALER PUB. CO. v. CLEVELAND, 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 STATE EX REL. PLAIN DEALER PUBLISHING CO. v. CLEVELAND. No. 2004-0448.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion to strike the affidavits submitted […]
SMITH v. LEIS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 SMITH v. LEIS. No. 2004-1104.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040273. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Sua sponte, the court orders the parties to brief the following issue: “Is […]
STATE v. ESPINAL, 104 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 STATE v. ESPINAL. No. 2004-2042.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030925. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
CLARK v. RISKO, 104 Ohio St.3d 1458 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 576 CLARK v. RISKO. No. 2004-0284.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Knox App. No. 03CA14, 2003-Ohio-7272. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for substitution of party Patricia L. Clark, deceased, by Carmen Comer. Motion granted.