STATE v. ROELLE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)

2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. ROELLE. No. 2004-1722.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83687, 2004-Ohio-4352. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent and would accept on Proposition of Law IV and remand for the application of State v. Jordan, 104 Ohio St.3d 21, 2004-Ohio-6085, […]

Read More

STATE v. ROBINSON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)

2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. ROBINSON. No. 2004-1758.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83508, 2004-Ohio-4483. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.

Read More

STATE v. WADE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)

2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. WADE. No. 2004-1753.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-774, 2004-Ohio-3974. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion to consolidate, motion to stay, and motion for bail denied as moot. LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal.

Read More

STATE v. JACKSON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)

2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. JACKSON. No. 2004-1759.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83420, 2004-Ohio-4467. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.

Read More

STATE v. CROSBY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)

2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. CROSBY. No. 2004-1747.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-03-1158, 2004-Ohio-4674. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents. LANZINGER, J., not participating.

Read More

DOLIS v. TALLMADGE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)

2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 DOLIS v. TALLMADGE. No. 2004-1702.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Summit App. No. 21803, 2004-Ohio-4454. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal not accepted. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the cross-appeal.

Read More