2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. LAND. No. 2004-1718.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040294. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1462
Articles Tagged: 821 N.E.2d 578
STATE v. ROELLE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. ROELLE. No. 2004-1722.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83687, 2004-Ohio-4352. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., dissent and would accept on Proposition of Law IV and remand for the application of State v. Jordan, 104 Ohio St.3d 21, 2004-Ohio-6085, […]
ECKEL v. SWANTON TWP. BD. OF TRUSTEES, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 ECKEL v. SWANTON TWP. BD. OF TRUSTEES. No. 2004-1703.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-03-1289, 2004-Ohio-4855. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents. LANZINGER, J., not participating.
STATE v. ROBINSON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. ROBINSON. No. 2004-1758.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83508, 2004-Ohio-4483. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
KRAUS v. PUT-IN-BAY TWP. BD. OF ZONING APPEALS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 KRAUS v. PUT-IN-BAY TWP. BD. OF ZONING APPEALS. No. 2004-1744.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Ottawa App. No. OT-04-011, 2004-Ohio-4678. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent.
STATE v. PETRALIA, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. PETRALIA. No. 2004-1890.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Lake App. No. 2001-L-101, 2003-Ohio-1745. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
HALE v. VOLUNTEERS OF AM., 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 HALE v. VOLUNTEERS OF AM. No. 2004-1701.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-020839, 2004-Ohio-4508. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.
IN RE J.L., 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 IN RE J.L. No. 2004-2065.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 84368, 2004-Ohio-6024. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
IN RE ESTATE OF FRAELICH, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 IN RE ESTATE OF FRAELICH. No. 2004-1700.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Trumbull App. No. 2000-T-0016, 2004-Ohio-4538. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
LAUTENSCHLEGER v. MONARCH MGT., INC., 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 LAUTENSCHLEGER v. MONARCH MGT., INC. No. 2004-1725.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Tuscarawas App. No. 2003AP120090, 2004-Ohio-4670. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW MOYER, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent.
STATE v. WADE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. WADE. No. 2004-1753.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-774, 2004-Ohio-3974. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motion to consolidate, motion to stay, and motion for bail denied as moot. LUNDBERG STRATTON and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would accept the appeal.
BELL v. BERRYMAN, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 BELL v. BERRYMAN. No. 2004-1780.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-500, 2004-Ohio-4708. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MORRIS v. ANDROS, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 MORRIS v. ANDROS. No. 2004-1704.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Summit App. Nos. 21861 and 21867, 2004-Ohio-4446. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
WEIDLE v. LEIST, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 WEIDLE v. LEIST. No. 2004-1732.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20296, 2004-Ohio-4693. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STEGALL v. CROSSMAN, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STEGALL v. CROSSMAN. No. 2004-1737.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Montgomery App. No. 20306, 2004-Ohio-4691. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
KRAMER v. ESTATE OF ANZELLOTTI, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 KRAMER v. ESTATE OF ANZELLOTTI. No. 2004-1730.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Mahoning App. No. 03 MA 217, 2004-Ohio-4906. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. JACKSON, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. JACKSON. No. 2004-1759.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83420, 2004-Ohio-4467. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. TANNER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. TANNER. No. 2004-1716.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Muskingum App. No. CT2004-0007, 2004-Ohio-4771. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. EARHART, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. EARHART. No. 2004-1768.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030526, 2004-Ohio-4791. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CHANDLER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. CHANDLER. No. 2004-1802.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 04AP-700. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CROSBY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. CROSBY. No. 2004-1747.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Lucas App. No. L-03-1158, 2004-Ohio-4674. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, J., dissents. LANZINGER, J., not participating.
STATE v. CARLEY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. CARLEY. No. 2004-1932.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 81001, 2004-Ohio-1901 and 2004-Ohio-5479. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
PERRY v. UNIV. HOSP. OF CLEVELAND, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 PERRY v. UNIV. HOSP. OF CLEVELAND. No. 2004-1728.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83034, 2004-Ohio-4098. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
KNISLEY v. BRAY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 KNISLEY v. BRAY. No. 2004-1733.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-887, 2004-Ohio-4553. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. SCOTT-HOOVER, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. SCOTT-HOOVER. No. 2004-1695.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Crawford App. No. 3-04-11, 2004-Ohio-4804. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. TODD, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. TODD. No. 2004-1767.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Clermont App. No. CA2003-10-088. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
PARKER v. CLEVELAND PUBLIC LIBRARY, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 PARKER v. CLEVELAND PUBLIC LIBRARY. No. 2004-1781.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83666, 2004-Ohio-4492. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent. Page 1463
STATE v. SWINNING, 104 Ohio St.3d 1462 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. SWINNING. No. 2004-1749.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Richland App. No. 03-CA-74, 2004-Ohio-5005. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. SANTIAGO, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. SANTIAGO. No. 2004-1966.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Franklin App. No. 02AP-1094, 2003-Ohio-2877. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. CUNNINGHAM, 104 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. CUNNINGHAM. No. 2004-1858.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Miami App. No. 2003 CA 17, 156 Ohio App.3d 714, 2004-Ohio-1935. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW PFEIFER, J., dissents.
DOLIS v. TALLMADGE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 DOLIS v. TALLMADGE. No. 2004-1702.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Summit App. No. 21803, 2004-Ohio-4454. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal not accepted. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents and would accept the cross-appeal.
STATE v. LOWE, 104 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-235, 821 N.E.2d 578 STATE v. LOWE. No. 2004-1708.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 26, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 82997, 2004-Ohio-4622. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW