JOHNSON v. CINCINNATI, 105 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2005)

2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 808 JOHNSON v. CINCINNATI. No. 2004-2178.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Alonzo Johnson. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

Read More

COFFMAN v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP., 105 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2005)

2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 808 COFFMAN v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP. No. 2004-2087.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS In Quo Warranto. On motions to dismiss, motion for sanctions for frivolous action, and motions for stay. Motions to dismiss sustained. Motion for sanctions denied. Motions for stay dismissed as moot. Cause […]

Read More

STATE EX REL. SHERMAN v. SARGEANT, 105 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2005)

2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 808 STATE EX REL. SHERMAN v. SARGEANT. No. 2004-2037.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. In Mandamus and Procedendo. On complaint of Robert Franklin Sherman. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., and O’DONNELL, J., dissent and […]

Read More

STATE v. FITZPATRICK, 105 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2005)

2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 808 STATE v. FITZPATRICK. No. 2002-0506.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Hamilton C.P. No. B0104117. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6). Motion denied.

Read More

STATE v. SMITH., 105 Ohio St.3d 1435 (2005)

2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 808 STATE v. SMITH. No. 1990-1433.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 15, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-880287. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS By entry filed December 29, 2004, this court ordered that appellant’s sentence be carried into execution on Tuesday, March 8, 2005. In order to facilitate this court’s timely consideration of any […]

Read More

HOWLAND v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., 105 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2005)

2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 808 HOWLAND v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P. No. 2003-1538.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Butler App. Nos. CA2002-09-220, CA2002-09-223 and CA2002-09-227, 2003-Ohio-3699. Reported at 104 Ohio St.3d 584, 2004-Ohio-6552, 821 N.E.2d 141. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to vacate judgment and for entry of a new judgment. Motion denied. PFEIFER […]

Read More