2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 STATE v. SEAL. No. 2004-2125.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Lake App. No. 2003-L-163, 2004-Ohio-5938. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
Articles Tagged: 822 N.E.2d 809
STATE v. CONWAY, 105 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 STATE v. CONWAY. No. 2003-1964.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Franklin C.P. No. 02CR063117. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County. On motion for substitution of counsel. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRATTON, […]
STATE v. LEVY, 105 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 STATE v. LEVY. No. 2005-0021.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83114, 2004-Ohio-4489. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
STATE EX REL. v. BD. OF EDN., 105 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 STATE EX REL. OHIO CONGRESS OF PARENTS AND TEACHERS v. STATE BD. OF EDN. No. 2004-1668.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-508, 2004-Ohio-4421. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cross-appeal of State Bd. of Edn. accepted on Propositions of Law II, III, and IV; cross-appeal […]
STATE v. WEST, 105 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 STATE v. WEST. No. 2005-0035.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83779, 2004-Ohio-5212. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.
BD. OF EDN. v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD., 105 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 BD. OF EDN. OF CLEVELAND MUN. SCHOOL DIST. v. CUYAHOGA CTY. BD. OF REVISION. No. 2004-1078.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2002-R-2641 and 2002-R-2642. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to strike pages 140-155 of appellant’s supplement. Motion granted. PFEIFER, J., dissents. MOYER, C.J., […]
COLUMBUS BAR ASSN. v. HALLIBURTON-COHEN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 COLUMBUS BAR ASSN. v. HALLIBURTON-COHEN. No. 2004-1808.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 03-113. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Lance Tibbles by Bruce A. Campbell. Motion granted.
STATE EX REL. MERIS v. INDUS. COMM., 105 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 STATE EX REL. MERIS v. INDUS. COMM. No. 2004-1454.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Franklin App. No. 03AP-810, 2004-Ohio-3883. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to strike appellant’s Propositions of Law II and III. Motion granted. RESNICK, PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. MALONE, 105 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 STATE v. MALONE. No. 2004-2147.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Marion App. No. 9-04-46. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, J., dissent.
STATE v. BURTON, 105 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 STATE v. BURTON. No. 2004-2139.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Licking App. No. 2004CA00027. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted. RESNICK and O’CONNOR, JJ., dissent.
CINCINNATI v. BASKIN, 105 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 CINCINNATI v. BASKIN. No. 2004-1829.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030864, 158 Ohio App.3d 539, 2004-Ohio-5055, 817 N.E.2d 433. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW RESNICK, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
STATE v. BIBBS, 105 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 STATE v. BIBBS. No. 2005-0010.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 83955, 2004-Ohio-5604. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.
BRICKMAN SONS v. NATL. CITY BANK, 105 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 BRICKMAN SONS, INC. v. NATL. CITY BANK. No. 2004-0819.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 81428, 2004-Ohio-1447. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and mootness. Motion denied.
IN RE C.R., 105 Ohio St.3d 1436 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 IN RE C.R. No. 2004-2031.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 82891, 2004-Ohio-4465. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On review of order certifying a conflict. The court Page 1437 determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal […]
STATE v. SCHMIESING, 105 Ohio St.3d 1437 (2005)
2005-Ohio-540, 822 N.E.2d 809 STATE v. SCHMIESING. No. 2005-0182.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 16, 2005. Darke App. No. 1640, 2005-Ohio-56. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.